Lenovo ThinkCentre A70Z & Asus EeeTop ET2203 All-In-One PCs
TEST RESULTS
AC Power Draw
|
System Power
|
|
Test State
|
EeeTop ET2203
|
ThinkCentre A70Z
|
IdeaCentre A600
|
|
Off
|
1W
|
1W
|
1W
|
|
Sleep
|
2W*
|
1W
|
2W
|
|
Idle
(screen off)
|
17W
|
25W
|
38W
|
|
Idle
(typical brightness)
|
33W
(65/100)
|
40W
(40/100)
|
53W
|
|
Idle
(maximum brightness)
|
39W
|
49W
|
|
|
CPU Load
|
70W
|
83W
|
100W
|
|
CPU + GPU
Load
|
84W
|
83W
|
125W
|
|
*drops to 7W after 5 seconds then to 2W after 30
seconds as the the display does not turn off immediately
|
As the EeeTop is based on notebook hardware it was no surprise to see it undercut
the Lenovo in power consumption, even with discrete graphics and a larger screen.
At typical screen brightness, the ET2203 idled 7W lower, and it used 13W less
on CPU load. The two systems were even once the GPU was placed on load as the
EeeTop's HD 4570 video card uses much more power than Intel's integrated graphics.
Incidentally, both systems are significantly more energy efficiency than the
Lenovo IdeaCentre A600 we reviewed in the fall.
Note: the ET2203's power figures were derived with the graphics card set
to "maximize performance" in the power options. Setting it to "maximize
battery life" prevents the GPU from reaching its nominal clock/memory speeds,
but results in a 1W reduction across the board (except when the GPU is stressed
in 3D).
Video Playback
|
Video Playback
|
|
Test State
|
EeeTop ET2203
|
ThinkCentre A70Z
|
|
Avg.
CPU
|
System Power
|
Avg.
CPU
|
System Power
|
|
Rush Hour
(H.264 10mbps)
|
13%
|
41W
|
30%
|
50W
|
|
Coral Reef
(WMV-HD 8mbps)
|
55%
|
47W
|
20%
|
48W
|
|
Spaceship
(x264 14mbps)
|
18%
|
44W
|
37%
|
60W
|
|
Iron Man
(Flash 2mbps)
|
50%
|
45W
|
31%
|
48W
|
Both systems played high definition video fairly well, with the ET2203 using
consistently less power. Though equipped with discrete ATI graphics, we could
not get hardware acceleration to work on the EeeTop when playing our WMV-HD
test clip, resulting in high CPU usage. Flash playback was also more CPU dependent
than we would have liked, but that may have been due to old drivers; the latest
ATI drivers for the HD 4570 are from September 2009, before Adobe released the
beta version of Flash Player that introduced support for GPU acceleration. In
addition the ET2203 has a lower CPU clock speed, so that accounts for some of
the increase in CPU usage.
Performance
|
Performance Benchmarks
|
|
Model
|
ThinkCentre A70Z
|
EeeTop ET2203
|
IdeaCentre A600
|
|
CPU
|
E7500 2.93GHz
|
T6600 2.2GHz
|
P7450 2.13GHz
|
|
GPU
|
X4500
|
HD 4570
|
HD 3650
|
|
RAM
|
1x2GB
|
2x2GB
|
2x2GB
|
|
HDD
|
320GB 7200rpm
|
500GB 5400rpm
|
1TB 7200rpm
|
|
Boot-up*
|
0:38
|
1:14
|
|
|
NOD32
|
5:24
|
10:05
|
|
|
WinRAR
|
3:56
|
4:20
|
4:14
|
|
iTunes
|
3:37
|
4:59
|
5:19
|
|
TMPGEnc
|
5:11
|
6:24
|
7:56
|
|
PCMark05
|
5557
|
4953
|
|
|
3DMark05
|
1597
|
5950
|
|
|
3DMark06
|
851
|
3176
|
3777
|
|
*start button to when the desktop loads fully
|
With a Core 2 Duo running close to 3GHz and a 7200rpm desktop hard drive, the
A70Z easily beat the ET2203 in our benchmark suite except in 3DMark. The Lenovo
posted better times in all our timed benchmarks, particularly anti-virus scanning
where it completed the task in almost half the time. The A70Z also booted up
in less than 40 seconds which is very impressive for a system running Windows
7. Against the IdeaCentre A600, the EeeTop's results were mixed given the similarity
between the two hardware sets.
| Help support this site, buy the Asus EeeTop ET2203-B0017 All-In-One Desktop from one of our affiliate retailers! | |
» 36222 reads
|