Viewing page 4 of 6 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
TESTING
For a fuller understanding of ATX power supplies, please read
the reference article Power
Supply Fundamentals. Those who seek source materials
can find Intel's various PSU design guides at Form
Factors.
For a complete rundown of testing equipment and procedures, please
refer to SPCR's
PSU Test Platform V4.1. The testing system is a close simulation of
a moderate airflow mid-tower PC optimized for low noise.
Acoustic measurements are now performed in our anechoic chamber with ambient level of 11 dBA or lower, with a PC-based spectrum analyzer comprised of SpectraPLUS software with ACO Pacific microphone and M-Audio digital audio interfaces.
In our test rig, the ambient temperature of the PSU varies proportionately
with its output load, which is exactly the way it is in a real PC environment.
But there is the added benefit of a high power load tester which allows incremental
load testing all the way to full power for any non-industrial PC power supply.
Both fan noise and voltage are measured at various standard loads. It is, in
general, a very demanding test, as the operating ambient temperature of the
PSU often reaches >40°C at full power. This is impossible to achieve
with an open test bench setup.
The 120mm fan responsible for "case airflow" is deliberately
run at a steady low level (6~7V) when the system is run at "low"
loads. When the test loads become greater, the 120mm fan is turned up to a higher
speed, but one that doesn't affect the noise level of the overall system. Anyone
who is running a system that draws 400W or more would definitely want more than
20CFM of airflow through their case, and at this point, the noise level of the
exhaust fan is typically not the greatest concern.
Great effort has been made to devise as realistic
an operating environment for the PSU as possible, but the thermal and noise
results obtained here still cannot be considered absolute. There are too many
variables in PCs and too many possible combinations of components for any single
test environment to provide infallible results. And there is always the bugaboo
of sample variance. These results are akin to a resume, a few detailed photographs,
and some short sound bites of someone you've never met. You'll probably get
a pretty good overall representation, but it is not quite the same as an extended
meeting in person.
REAL SYSTEM POWER NEEDS: While we test the PSU to full
output in order to verify the manufacturer's claims, real desktop PCs simply
do not require anywhere near this level of power. The most pertinent range of
DC output power is between about 40W and 300W, because it is the power range
where most systems will be working most of the time. To illustrate this point,
we
conducted system tests to measure the power draw of several actual systems
under idle and worst-case conditions. Our most power-hungry overclocked
130W TDP processor rig with an ATI Radeon X1950XTX-512 graphics card drew ~256W
DC peak from the power supply under full load — well within the capabilities
of any modern power supply. Please follow the link provided above to see the
details. It is true that very elaborate systems with the most power hungry dual
video cards today might draw as much as another 150~200W, but the total should
remain under 500W in extrapolations of our real world measurements.
INTERPRETING TEMPERATURE DATA
It important to keep in mind that PSU fan speed varies with temperature,
not output load. A power supply generates more heat as output increases, but
this is not the only the only factor that affects fan speed. Ambient temperature
and case airflow have almost as much effect. Our test rig represents a challenging
thermal situation for a power supply: A large portion of the heat generated
inside the case must be exhausted through the power supply, which causes a corresponding
increase in fan speed.
When examining thermal data, the most important indicator of cooling
efficiency is the difference between intake and exhaust. Because
the heat generated in the PSU loader by the output of the PSU is always the
same for a given power level, the intake temperature should be roughly the same
between different tests. The only external variable is the ambient room temperature.
The temperature of the exhaust air from the PSU is affected by several factors:
- Intake temperature (determined by ambient temperature and power output
level)
- Efficiency of the PSU (how much heat it generates while producing the
required output)
- The effectiveness of the PSU's cooling system, which is comprised of:
- Overall mechanical and airflow design
- Size, shape and overall surface area of heatsinks
- Fan(s) and fan speed control circuit
The thermal rise in the power supply is really the
only indicator we have about all of the above. This is why the intake temperature
is important: It represents the ambient temperature around the power supply
itself. Subtracting the intake temperature from the exhaust temperature gives
a reasonable gauge of the effectiveness of the power supply's cooling system.
This is the only temperature number that is comparable between different reviews,
as it is unaffected by the ambient temperature.
TEST RESULTS
The ambient temperature was 22~23°C, and the ambient noise
level was 10~11 dBA. AC input voltage was 118~121V.
|
OUTPUT, REGULATION & EFFICIENCY: Enermax Modu87+
EMG500AWT
|
|
DC Output Voltage (V) + Current (A)
|
DC Output
|
AC Input
|
Calculated Efficiency
|
|
+12V1
|
+12V2
|
+5V
|
+3.3V
|
-12V
|
+5VSB
|
|
12.27
|
0.97
|
12.27
|
0
|
5.07
|
0.97
|
3.45
|
0.97
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
21.8
|
33
|
62.2%
|
|
12.27
|
0.97
|
12.27
|
1.71
|
5.08
|
0.98
|
3.46
|
0
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
43.4
|
56
|
77.5%
|
|
12.28
|
1.85
|
12.28
|
1.72
|
5.08
|
1.91
|
3.45
|
1.76
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
65.6
|
78
|
84.1%
|
|
12.28
|
1.86
|
12.28
|
3.35
|
5.08
|
1.92
|
3.44
|
0.92
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
88.5
|
103
|
85.9%
|
|
12.25
|
4.86
|
12.25
|
4.78
|
5.05
|
2.85
|
3.42
|
2.64
|
0.2
|
0.9
|
152.2
|
172
|
88.5%
|
|
12.25
|
6.48
|
12.25
|
6.60
|
5.05
|
3.56
|
3.41
|
3.56
|
0.2
|
1.2
|
201.2
|
222
|
90.6%
|
|
12.21
|
7.67
|
12.21
|
8.08
|
5.04
|
5.40
|
3.39
|
4.38
|
0.3
|
1.5
|
250.6
|
277
|
90.5%
|
|
12.19
|
9.69
|
12.19
|
9.50
|
5.02
|
6.15
|
3.38
|
7.06
|
0.4
|
1.8
|
298.5
|
331
|
90.2%
|
|
12.13
|
13.22
|
12.13
|
12.45
|
4.95
|
8.57
|
3.34
|
7.88
|
0.5
|
2.4
|
401.9
|
459
|
87.6%
|
|
12.10
|
14.98
|
12.10
|
16.87
|
4.93
|
10.94
|
3.32
|
10.17
|
0.6
|
3.0
|
499.4
|
575
|
86.9%
|
|
Crossload Test
|
|
11.85
|
16.70
|
11.77
|
15.16
|
5.11
|
0.98
|
3.37
|
0.96
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
384.6
|
470
|
81.1%
|
|
+12V Ripple (peak-to-peak): <47mV through
full operating range
+5V Ripple (peak-to-peak): <17mV @ through full operating
range
+3.3V Ripple (peak-to-peak): <12mV @ through full operating
range
|
|
NOTE: The current and voltage for -12V and
+5VSB lines is not measured but based on switch settings. It is a tiny
portion of the total, and errors arising from inaccuracies on these
lines is <1W.
|
|
OTHER DATA SUMMARY: Enermax Modu87+ EMG500AWT
|
| Nominal Load (W) |
20
|
40
|
65
|
90
|
150
|
200
|
250
|
300
|
400
|
500
|
| Intake °C |
21
|
22
|
22
|
24
|
27
|
29
|
29
|
30
|
37
|
40
|
| Exhaust °C |
25
|
26
|
27
|
29
|
34
|
37
|
41
|
44
|
46
|
57
|
| Temp Rise °C |
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
7
|
8
|
12
|
14
|
9
|
17
|
| SPL (dBA @ 1m) |
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
11
|
14
|
20
|
23
|
| Power Factor |
0.96
|
0.98
|
0.98
|
0.98
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
AC Power in Standby: 0.3W / 0.09 PF
AC Power with No Load, PSU power On: 4.3W / 0.87 PF
|
|
NOTE: The ambient room temperature during
testing can vary a few degrees from review to review. Please take this
into account when comparing our PSU test data.
|
NOTE: Both Modu87+ 500W and Pro87+ 500W samples were
tested, but the results were so close that there's no point listing both
sets of data. The two samples might as well have been of the same model, as
the results were nearly identical. Typical variations were less than ~2W for
any load setting, temperatures were within about a degree, and the noise level
was identical through the whole range of loads.
1. EFFICIENCY This is a measure of AC-to-DC conversion
efficiency. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide recommends 80% efficiency or
better at all output power loads. 80% efficiency means that to deliver 80W DC
output, a PSU draws 100W AC input, and 20W is lost as heat within the PSU. Higher
efficiency is preferred for reduced energy consumption and cooler operation.
It allows reduced cooling airflow, which translates to lower noise. The 80 Plus
Gold standard requires a minimum of 87% efficiency at 20% load, 90% efficiency
at 50% load, and 87% efficiency at full rated maximum load.
Our samples met 80 Plus Gold requirements. 80% efficiency was
reached at a very low 50W; by 90W, it was already at 86%. A broad peak of >90%
efficiency was maintained from about 170W to 330W load. Beyond that, it drooped
a bit as expected, down to ~87% at maximum load.
The Seasonic X-650
reached slightly higher peak efficiency and maintained it to a higher load,
which is expected given its higher power rating. The overall efficiency curves
of the two models look very similar.
2. DC VOLTAGE REGULATION refers to how stable the output
voltages are under various load conditions. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide
calls for the +12, +5V and +3.3V lines to be maintained within ±5%.
Unless a unit goes into overload, it's rare that we see significant
problems with voltage regulation with the higher quality PSUs SPCR generally
examines. The Enermax Modu87+ is no exception it was nearly always within
±2% on any line. With the exception of the cross-load test (which is
strenuous), the +12V line stayed above the specified +12V at all times.
3. AC RIPPLE refers to unwanted "noise"
artifacts in the DC output of a switching power supply. It's usually very high
in frequency (in the order of 100s of kHz). The peak-to-peak value is measured.
The ATX12V Guide allows up to 120mV (peak-to-peak) of AC ripple on the +12V
line and 50mV on the +5V and +3.3V lines. Where voltage regulation is a measure
of variance from spec, ripple is more a measure of tolerance: How much the voltage
is changing at any given time. Ripple is of interest to over- and under-clockers
who push their systems to the limits of what they are actually capable
of rather than relying on what the specs say they should be capable of.
Ripple on the 12V line was a little higher than we've seen in
other top units, but still well within spec at <47mV all the way to full
load. The 5V and 3.3V lines exhibited very low ripple, under 17mV and 12mV at
all levels.
4. POWER FACTOR is ideal when it measures 1.0. In the most
practical sense, PF is a measure of how "difficult" it is for the
electric utility to deliver the AC power into your power supply. High PF reduces
the AC current draw, which reduces stress on the electric wiring in your home
(and elsewhere up the line). It also means you can do with a smaller, cheaper
UPS backup; they are priced according to their VA (volt-ampere) rating.
As is the case for most units with active power factor correction
(which, these days, is most reputable brands), PFC was close to perfect, starting
at 0.96 for the minuscule 20W load, and staying at 0.99 through most of the
operating range.
5. LOW LOAD TESTING revealed no problems starting at very
low loads and it stayed operational with no load applied. It also started without
a load, with a very low 4.3W AC power draw.
6. LOW & 240 VAC PERFORMANCE
The power supply was set to 400W load with 120VAC through the
hefty variac in the lab. The variac was then dialed 10V lower every 5 minutes.
This is to check the stability of the PSU under brownout conditions where the
AC line voltage drops from the 120V norm. Most full-range input power supplies
achieve higher efficiency with higher AC input voltage. SPCR's lab is equipped
with a 240VAC line, which was used to check power supply efficiency for the
benefit of those who live in 240VAC mains regions.
|
Various VAC Inputs: Modu87+ 500 @ 400W Output
|
|
VAC
|
AC Power
|
Efficiency
|
|
244V
|
440W
|
90.9%
|
|
120V
|
456W
|
87.8%
|
|
100V
|
463W
|
86.4%
|
Efficiency improved a little over 3% with 244VAC input at this
load. The sample passed the 100VAC minimum input without any issues. Neither
voltage regulation nor ripple changed appreciably during the test.
7. TEMPERATURE & COOLING
The Modu/Pro 87+ 500W samples kept temperature rise to under 10°C
until over 200W load. The fan did not speed up even when the temperature rise
went up to 12°C at 250W load, but it did speed up at 300W load, to an undetermined
RPM and reached 14 dBA@1m at 300W. By 400W, the fan was spinning fast enough
to make 20 dBA@1m SPL, and bring the temperature rise back down, to just 9°C.
At full load, where Enermax says the fan spins at 1000 RPM, the temperature
rise was still a modest 17°C. This is excellent cooling, especially in light
of the slow, quiet fan. As with all really quiet PSUs, don't count on the Modu/Pro
87+ 500W to remove much heat from your system; make sure your cases fans do
their job.
| Help support this site, buy from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|