Viewing page 4 of 6 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
TESTING
For a fuller understanding of ATX power supplies, please read
the reference article Power
Supply Fundamentals. Those who seek source materials
can find Intel's various PSU design guides at Form
Factors.
For a complete rundown of testing equipment and procedures, please
refer to SPCR's
PSU Test Platform V4.1. The testing system is a close simulation of
a moderate airflow mid-tower PC optimized for low noise.
Acoustic measurements are now performed in our anechoic chamber with ambient level of 11 dBA or lower, with a PC-based spectrum analyzer comprised of SpectraPLUS software with ACO Pacific microphone and M-Audio digital audio interfaces.
In our test rig, the ambient temperature of the PSU varies proportionately
with its output load, which is exactly the way it is in a real PC environment.
But there is the added benefit of a high power load tester which allows incremental
load testing all the way to full power for any non-industrial PC power supply.
Both fan noise and voltage are measured at various standard loads. It is, in
general, a very demanding test, as the operating ambient temperature of the
PSU often reaches >40°C at full power. This is impossible to achieve
with an open test bench setup.
The 120mm fan responsible for "case airflow" is deliberately
run at a steady low level (7V) when the system is run at "low" loads.
When the test loads become greater, the 120mm fan is turned up to a higher speed,
but one that doesn't affect the noise level of the overall system. Anyone who
is running a system that draws 400W or more would definitely want more than
20CFM of airflow through their case, and at this point, the noise level of the
exhaust fan is typically not the greatest concern.
Great effort has been made to devise as realistic
an operating environment for the PSU as possible, but the thermal and noise
results obtained here still cannot be considered absolute. There are too many
variables in PCs and too many possible combinations of components for any single
test environment to provide infallible results. And there is always the bugaboo
of sample variance. These results are akin to a resume, a few detailed photographs,
and some short sound bites of someone you've never met. You'll probably get
a pretty good overall representation, but it is not quite the same as an extended
meeting in person.
REAL SYSTEM POWER NEEDS: While we test the PSU to full
output in order to verify the manufacturer's claims, real desktop PCs simply
do not require anywhere near this level of power. The most pertinent range of
DC output power is between about 40W and 300W, because it is the power range
where most systems will be working most of the time. To illustrate this point,
we
conducted system tests to measure the power draw of several actual systems
under idle and worst-case conditions. Our most power-hungry overclocked
130W TDP processor rig with an ATI Radeon X1950XTX-512 graphics card drew ~256W
DC peak from the power supply under full load — well within the capabilities
of any modern power supply. Please follow the link provided above to see the
details. It is true that very elaborate systems with the most power hungry dual
video cards today might draw as much as another 150~200W, but the total should
remain under 500W in extrapolations of our real world measurements.
INTERPRETING TEMPERATURE DATA
It important to keep in mind that PSU fan speed varies with temperature,
not output load. A power supply generates more heat as output increases, but
this is not the only the only factor that affects fan speed. Ambient temperature
and case airflow have almost as much effect. Our test rig represents a challenging
thermal situation for a power supply: A large portion of the heat generated
inside the case must be exhausted through the power supply, which causes a corresponding
increase in fan speed.
When examining thermal data, the most important indicator of cooling
efficiency is the difference between intake and exhaust. Because
the heat generated in the PSU loader by the output of the PSU is always the
same for a given power level, the intake temperature should be roughly the same
between different tests. The only external variable is the ambient room temperature.
The temperature of the exhaust air from the PSU is affected by several factors:
- Intake temperature (determined by ambient temperature and power output
level)
- Efficiency of the PSU (how much heat it generates while producing the
required output)
- The effectiveness of the PSU's cooling system, which is comprised of:
- Overall mechanical and airflow design
- Size, shape and overall surface area of heatsinks
- Fan(s) and fan speed control circuit
The thermal rise in the power supply is really the
only indicator we have about all of the above. This is why the intake temperature
is important: It represents the ambient temperature around the power supply
itself. Subtracting the intake temperature from the exhaust temperature gives
a reasonable gauge of the effectiveness of the power supply's cooling system.
This is the only temperature number that is comparable between different reviews,
as it is unaffected by the ambient temperature.
TEST RESULTS
The ambient temperature was 20~23°C, and the ambient noise
level was 10~11 dBA. AC input voltage was 118~121V.
|
OUTPUT, REGULATION & EFFICIENCY: Cougar GX-700
|
|
DC Output Voltage (V) + Current (A)
|
DC Output
|
AC Input
|
Calculated Efficiency
|
|
+12V1
|
+12V2
|
+5V
|
+3.3V
|
-12V
|
+5VSB
|
|
12.26
|
0.97
|
12.26
|
0
|
5.10
|
0.99
|
3.40
|
0.97
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
21.9
|
35
|
64.5%
|
|
12.26
|
0.97
|
12.26
|
1.73
|
5.10
|
0.99
|
3.40
|
0.97
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
43.1
|
58
|
75.7%
|
|
12.24
|
1.90
|
12.24
|
1.72
|
5.09
|
1.94
|
3.40
|
2.69
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
65.4
|
81
|
80.7%
|
|
12.23
|
1.90
|
12.23
|
3.42
|
5.08
|
2.89
|
3.40
|
2.66
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
90.9
|
112
|
83.4%
|
|
12.16
|
4.75
|
12.16
|
4.90
|
5.03
|
3.74
|
3.38
|
3.53
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
152.8
|
178
|
86.8%
|
|
12.17
|
6.39
|
12.17
|
5.58
|
5.04
|
6.20
|
3.35
|
5.99
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
201.9
|
234
|
89.3%
|
|
12.12
|
6.42
|
12.12
|
8.55
|
5.01
|
8.01
|
3.34
|
6.60
|
0.3
|
0.9
|
251.7
|
292
|
89.9%
|
|
12.10
|
9.33
|
12.10
|
8.44
|
5.00
|
9.58
|
3.33
|
8.65
|
0.3
|
1.1
|
300.8
|
347
|
89.3%
|
|
12.04
|
12.35
|
12.04
|
12.06
|
4.95
|
11.86
|
3.29
|
11.40
|
0.4
|
1.3
|
401.4
|
465
|
88.4%
|
|
11.96
|
19.86
|
11.96
|
13.95
|
4.89
|
18.24
|
3.24
|
16.28
|
0.6
|
1.5
|
550.6
|
599
|
87.0%
|
|
11.89
|
22.14
|
11.89
|
23.28
|
4.82
|
17.28
|
3.21
|
16.98
|
0.7
|
2.4
|
698.2
|
936
|
83.9%
|
|
Crossload Test
|
|
12.00
|
22.74
|
12.00
|
23.02
|
5.1
|
0.98
|
3.40
|
0.97
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
561.8
|
644
|
87.2%
|
|
+12V Ripple (peak-to-peak): <20mv at <200W;
50mV at 700W load
+5V Ripple (peak-to-peak): <12mV at <200, 32mV at 700W load
+3.3V Ripple (peak-to-peak): <12mV at <200W, 29mV at 700W
load
|
|
NOTE: The current and voltage for -12V and
+5VSB lines is not measured but based on switch settings. It is a tiny
portion of the total, and errors arising from inaccuracies on these lines
is <1W.
|
|
OTHER DATA SUMMARY: Cougar GX-700
|
| Nominal Load (W) |
20
|
40
|
65
|
90
|
150
|
200
|
250
|
300
|
400
|
550
|
700
|
| Intake °C |
21
|
21
|
23
|
23
|
28
|
32
|
33
|
32
|
36
|
44
|
50
|
| Exhaust °C |
22
|
22
|
24
|
25
|
30
|
34
|
35
|
36
|
38
|
48
|
61
|
| Temp Rise °C |
1
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
11
|
| SPL (dBA @ 1m) |
15
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
18
|
20
|
25
|
32
|
35
|
36
|
| Fan (Volts) |
3.6
|
3.6
|
3.6
|
3.6
|
3.8
|
4.2
|
4.8
|
6.0
|
8.9
|
11.1
|
11.2
|
| Power Factor |
0.93
|
0.95
|
0.98
|
0.97
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
AC Power in Standby: 0.4W
AC Power with No Load, PSU power On: 9.8W / 0.86 PF
|
|
NOTE: The ambient room temperature during
testing can vary a few degrees from review to review. Please take this
into account when comparing our PSU test data.
|
1. EFFICIENCY This is a measure of AC-to-DC conversion
efficiency. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide recommends 80% efficiency or
better at all output power loads. 80% efficiency means that to deliver 80W DC
output, a PSU draws 100W AC input, and 20W is lost as heat within the PSU. Higher
efficiency is preferred for reduced energy consumption and cooler operation.
It allows reduced cooling airflow, which translates to lower noise. The 80 Plus
Gold standard requires a minimum of 87% efficiency at 20% load, 90% efficiency
at 50% load, and 87% efficiency at full rated maximum load.
One point of note is that the 80 Plus qualifying test is performed
on an open bench top at typical room temperature. In contrast, SPCR's testing
is conducted at realistic in-PC temperature, often well over 40°C at high
power. This difference results in SPCR test results showing lower efficiency
that the 80 Plus reports at the higher power loads. This is a fundamental flaw
in the 80 Plus test procedure that we've observed since the very start of the
80 Plus program; if realistic operational temperature was used for their testing,
very few PSUs rated higher than ~400W would achieve 80 Plus Gold efficiency
at full rated power.
Our sample came very close to the 80 Plus Gold requirements but
didn't quite meet them all. 87% efficiency was reached at just over 150W, which
is a bit higher than 20% of rated load (140W). 90% efficiency was reached at
a fairly low 250W load, but at 50% of rated power (350W), efficiency was around
89%, not 90% as required. As expected, at full rated 700W load with the hot
test box temperature reaching 50°C, efficiency fell to 3% lower than the
required 87%. The last miss can be forgiven as our test conditons are thermally
far more demading than that required by 80 Plus, but the failure to meet 90%
efficiency at just 350W is a bit surprising. Admittedly, it was a close miss,
falling short by just 1%, and our load power calibration is probably not better
than 1% accurate anyway.
2. DC VOLTAGE REGULATION refers to how stable the output
voltages are under various load conditions. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide
calls for the +12, +5V and +3.3V lines to be maintained within ±5%.
Unless a unit goes into overload, it's rare that we see significant
problems with voltage regulation with the higher quality PSUs SPCR generally
examines. The VR was very good, within ±2% on the 12V line under all
loads. It sagged slightly more at high loads on the lower voltage lines, to
about -3.5% on the 5V line and -2.8% on the 3.3V line. These are fine results.
3. AC RIPPLE refers to unwanted "noise"
artifacts in the DC output of a switching power supply. It's usually very high
in frequency (in the order of 100s of kHz). The peak-to-peak value is measured.
The ATX12V Guide allows up to 120mV (peak-to-peak) of AC ripple on the +12V
line and 50mV on the +5V and +3.3V lines. Where voltage regulation is a measure
of variance from spec, ripple is more a measure of tolerance: How much the voltage
is changing at any given time. Ripple is of interest to over- and under-clockers
who push their systems to the limits of what they are actually capable
of rather than relying on what the specs say they should be capable of.
Ripple on the 12V line was low, and rose linearly with load from
a low of under 20mV to just 50mVat full power. The 5V and 3.3V lines also were
well within spec, with ~30mV maximum ripple & noise.
4. POWER FACTOR is ideal when it measures 1.0. In the most
practical sense, PF is a measure of how "difficult" it is for the
electric utility to deliver the AC power into your power supply. High PF reduces
the AC current draw, which reduces stress on the electric wiring in your home
(and elsewhere up the line). It also means you can do with a smaller, cheaper
UPS backup; they are priced according to their VA (volt-ampere) rating.
As is the case for most units with active power factor correction
(which, these days, is most reputable brands), PFC was close to perfect, starting
at 0.93 for the minuscule 20W load, and staying at 0.99 through most of the
operating range.
5. LOW LOAD TESTING revealed no problems starting at very
low loads and it stayed operational with no load applied. As advertised, the
power draw in the off (standby mode) was just 0.4W. It also started without
any load, with a 9.8W AC power draw.
6. LOW & 240 VAC PERFORMANCE
The power supply was set to 560W load with 120VAC through the
hefty variac in the lab. The variac was then dialed 10V lower every 5 minutes.
This is to check the stability of the PSU under brownout conditions w here the
AC line voltage drops from the 120V norm. Most full-range input power supplies
achieve higher efficiency with higher AC input voltage. SPCR's lab is equipped
with a 240VAC line, which was used to check power supply efficiency for the
benefit of those who live in 240VAC mains regions. Since the Cougar GX-700
is currently sold only in the EU, the high VAC effiiciency is particularly interesting.
|
Various VAC Inputs: Cougar GX-700 @ 560W Output
|
|
VAC
|
AC Power
|
Efficiency
|
|
244V
|
617W
|
90.8%
|
|
120V
|
638W
|
87.8%
|
|
100V
|
651W
|
86.0%
|
Efficiency improved nearly 3% with 244VAC input at this load.
The sample passed the 100VAC minimum input without any issues. Neither voltage
regulation nor ripple changed appreciably during the test.
7. TEMPERATURE & COOLING
The Cougar GX-700 was one of the coolest running PSUs we've tested,
with the temperature rise through the unit often staying at just 2°C. This
was due partly to the somewhat aggressive fan controller and the larger than usual 140mm diameter fan, as well as the high average efficiency. Temperature
rise stayed below 4°C until maximum rated power, when it reached 11°C
after about 25 minutes.
| Help support this site, buy from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|