Viewing page 4 of 6 pages. Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
A Windows 7 image loaded with our test suite was cloned to a 50/100GB partition
at the beginning of each drive (depending on its overall size) and our entire
test suite was run start to finish 3 times with a reboot and defragmentation
in between runs except for SSDs and the Momentus
XT (defragmentation resets optimizations made to the XT's flash memory).
The best times were collected for comparison.
Game load times were superb for both the new VelociRaptor and Caviar Black,
but the Black took 10 seconds longer to boot. The 2TB model specifications
list an "average drive ready time" of 21 seconds, three times longer
than the VR600. We've never really been conscious of how long a drive takes
to power up until now in our experience most desktop drives spin-up in
about the the same amount of time. The slow power up process on the new Caviar
Black was impossible not to notice, though it was more like 10 seconds rather
than 21. The old VelociRaptor held up very well in these tests, though its
newer sibling booted up seven seconds faster.
The two new WD drives were neck and neck in application performance, easily
besting other mechanical hard drives. The Caviar Black beat out its closest
rival, the Barracuda
XT by 25% in our ExactFile test, while the VR600 was about 29% faster
than its predecessor.
When copying files to itself, once again the two drives performed very similarly.
Timed installs of PowerDVD and 3DMark06 favored the SSDNow and Barracuda 7200.11.
The Black and new VelociRaptor were a step behind, grouped tightly with the
older VelociRaptor and Barracuda XT.
|Help support this site, buy the WD Caviar Black Hard Drive 2TB from one of our affiliate retailers!|