Ultra X-Connect 500W PSU

Power
Viewing page 3 of 3 pages. Previous 1 2 3

TEST RESULTS

For a complete rundown of testing equipment and procedures, please refer to the article SPCR's Revised PSU Testing System. It is a close simulation of a moderate airflow mid-tower PC optimized for low noise.

In the test rig, the ambient temperature of the PSU varies proportionately with its actual output load, which is exactly the way it is in a real PC environment. But there is the added benefit of a precise high power load tester which allows incremental load testing all the way to full power for any non-industrial PC power supply. Both fan noise and voltage are measured at various loads. It is, in general, a very demanding test, as the operating ambient temperature of the PSU often reaches 40°C or more at full power. This is impossible to achieve with an open test bench setup.

SPCR's new high fidelity sound recording system was used to create MP3 sound files of this PSU -- our first of a power supply. As with the setup for recording fans, the position of the mic was 3" from the exhaust vent at a 45° angle, outside the airflow turbulence area. The photo below shows the setup. All noise sources in the room other than the PSU were turned off while making the sound recordings.

Ambient conditions during testing were 22°C and 18 dBA, with input of 119.5 VAC / 60 Hz measured at the AC outlet.

Ultra X-Connect 500W TEST RESULTS
DC Output (W)
65
90
150
200
300
400
500
AC Input (W)
96
129
206
261
390
538
685
Efficiency
68%
70%
73%
77%
77%
74%
73%
Intake Temp (°C)
27
27
30
34
36
39
42
PSU Exhaust (°C)
29
29
33
38
42
46
51
Fan Voltage
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.1
9.5
11.4
11.6
Noise (dBA/1m)
33
33
33
35
42
47
47
MP3 recordings* Ultra X-Connect PSU at 200W (35 dBA/1m)
Power Factor
0.6
0.61
0.63
0.64
0.67
0.68
0.69
NOTE: The ambient room temperature during testing varies a few degrees from review to review. Please take this into account when comparing PSU test data.
* There are only sound clips for 65W and 200W because the noise was roughly the same for the entire power range. After 200W, the SPL jumps to a level that isn't worth listening to: It is simply too loud.

1. VOLTAGE REGULATION was fairly good, with the exception of the 12V line being consistently high. The 12V rail typically provides power to the motherboard (for the CPU), disk drives, fans, and cooling devices, so proper operation is very important. Although it may just be this particular sample and not a common trend of the X-Connect, it is a bit troubling. Throughout the range of test power output levels, the range was as follows:

  • +12V: 12.25 ~ 12.49V
  • +5V: 4.86~ 5.13V
  • +3.3V: 3.1 ~ 3.38V

2. AC-to-DC Conversion EFFICIENCY was good. It was average at the <100W output loads, but improved to 73~77% above 150W output. As many desktop system will rarely draw even 150W in DC, we have to say that the efficiency in normal use will only be average at best. The efficiency of the unit around ~250W is very good, but the odds of anyone consistently drawing that sort of wattage are slim to none.

3. POWER OUTPUT: The unit ran with good stability at all output levels. The maximum power output test was limited to five minutes instead of the usual 15~30 minutes at the other power levels.

4. POWER FACTOR was poor, ranging from 0.6~0.69 depending upon the load. In simple terms, PF tells us how much AC power is lost to harmonics (unnecessary electromagnetic energy) while driving the PSU. While PF is not significant in terms of noise, heat or performance of the PC, it is relevant to electricity consumption and energy conservation. The aforementioned results indicates that the X-Connect is using passive PFC or no PFC at all. This results in greater electricity consumption than a unit with Active PFC. Given the cost of this unit, we'd like to see an Active PFC employed here, since there are cheaper units on the market that have Active PFC.

5. FAN VOLTAGE / NOISE : We generally consider 30 dBA/1m to be the maximum sound pressure a computer should emit before it is no longer "quiet." Unfortunately, the lowest sound pressure the X-Connect achieved was a rather dismal 33 dBA/1m. The good news is that if one were so inclined, a fan swap could result in a pretty quiet unit, but the stock X-Connect simply isn't very quiet at all. Below are sound recordings of the X-Connect, and also recordings of the Seasonic Tornado 400 Rev.A3 (a SPCR overachiever by any means) for reference:

Ultra X-Connect @ 65W (33 dBA/1m)

Ultra X-Connect @ 200W (35 dBA/1m)

Seasonic Tornado 400 @ 65W (19 dBA/1m)

Seasonic Tornado 400 @ 200W (24 dBA/1m)

Panaflo 80L 12V Reference MP3 (24 dBA/1m)

HOW TO LISTEN & COMPARE

These recordings were made with a high resolution studio quality digital recording system. The microphone is 3" from the edge of the fan frame at a 45° angle, facing the intake side of the fan to avoid direct wind noise. The ambient noise during all recordings was 18 dBA or lower.

Comparing the Ultra X-Connect to the Seasonic Tornado should give a good frame of reference concerning how much louder the Ultra X-Connect is comparatively speaking. For full details on how to calibrate your sound system to get the most valid listening comparison, please see the yellow text box entitled Listen to the Fans on page four of the article SPCR's Test / Sound Lab: A Short Tour.

The Ultra X-Connect at 65W is clearly much louder than the Seasonic Tornado, and has quite a bit more clatter and roughness to the overall sound. While the Tornado is a smooth, constant pfffff sound, the X-Connect has an unpleasant mechanical intensity. Overall, the Tornado is much smoother and more subdued. We didn't include sound clips for the X-Connect at 90W and 150W levels, as they're almost identical to the 65W clip. At 200W, the Ultra X-Connect gets significantly louder still, but it's really beside the point since it has already crossed the noise threshold we consider to be acceptable for a quiet computer.

CONCLUSIONS

While the Ultra X-Connect 500W PSU is certainly competent in its ability to deliver power, it doesn't really fit SPCR's critera for a quiet component. The overall performance of the sample is more than adequate from a power delivery perspective, but leaves much to be desired from an acoustic perspective. Even at low power loads (65-100W), the power supply measured well above 30 dBA/1m in our sound tests.

The efficiency of the unit was fairly good, but far below that of some recent PSUs to pass through our rigorous testing procedure. Active PFC is increasingly seen on higher priced PSUs; its absence here is a bit disappointing.

The modular cabling system is an excellent, well executed feature. We'd love to see more PSUs come with similar implementations to help prevent case clutter and facilitate efficient airflow. It should also be said that with a bit of modding, this PSU could be quite good acoustically -- swapping out the stock fans with Panaflos is a move some quiet-oriented but bling-driven modders might consider. Lastly, if you're looking for looks -- snazzy fan grill, UV-reactive cables, and high-gloss paint finish -- along with high power, then the Ultra X-Connect is certainly worthy of your consideration.

Much thanks to Ultra Products for this Ultra X-Connect 500 sample.

* * *

Discuss this article in the SPCR Forums.



Previous 1 2 3

Power - Article Index
Help support this site, buy the Ultra X-Connect 500 from one of our affiliate retailers!