Recommended Hard Drives

Reference|Recommended | Storage
Viewing page 1 of 2 pages. 1 2 Next
  • Oct 04, 2014: Complete overhaul & update
  • April 28, 2010: Complete overhaul of article, with only HDDs tested (or retested) in the anechoic chamber.
  • June 13, 2008: WD single-platter 320GB, Velociraptor and Samsung F1 drives added
  • Dec 15, 2007: Western Digital Green Power WD7500AACS added
  • April 3, 2007: Samsung Spinpoint T HD400LJ and WD Scorpio 120 added; other minor changes.
  • June 30, 2006: Minor changes and added the WD5000KS as the quietest currently available drive.
  • October 4, 2005: Complete revision of text and rankings based on reviews with our latest HDD testing methodology.
  • January 15, 2005: Another reevaluation of the whole article and rankings.
  • April 11, 2004: A long overdue overhaul of the entire article and ranking table, including information from reviews over the past year, expanded HDD discussion, a new notebook drive table, and a section on some excluded drives.
  • May 11, 2003: Info from recent reviews added, including Samsung SP1604N, Seagate Barracuda IV & 7200.7, and IBM 180GXP. Also revised rankings slightly.
  • Jan 11, 2003: IBM 180GXP added
  • Dec 10, 2002: Minor changes + addition of HDD Noise Reduction Products
  • Updated Sept 18, 2002
  • First published July 17, 2002

SPCR began publishing hard drive reviews in March 2002. From the beginning, the focus was on noise. An improved methodology for testing hard drives was introduced in May 2005. Since then, we have made one major change: All acoustic testing has been conducted in our own anechoic chamber since the fall of 2008. This allows us to obtain accurate SPL measurements down to about 10~11 [email protected] Previously, we were limited by ambient noise and limitations in our audio measurement equipment to about 18 [email protected] during the day. The upgrade in our acoustic testing coincides happily with a wider range of new 5400 / 5900 RPM HDDs that bump against the noise floor, even in our anechoic chamber.


HDDs are racing to ever higher capacity, and ever lower prices as well. From the $/GB perspective, 5400 and 5900 RPM 3.5" drives remain king. The HDD is not going away any time soon with the massive amounts of data growing ever larger in the data centers, and the similar acceleration of image and video accumulation in personal computing devices. As I write this, mainstream HDDs have reached 6TB capacity, and 8~12 TB will be achieved in the very near future.

Corporate consolidations in the past decade have shrunk the number of hard drive manufacturers to just three: Samsung's HDD division is now a part of giant Seagate, and only the 2.5" drives have retained the Samsung label thus far. Hitachi's HDD division is now part of Western Digital, the other big player, but its brand continues relatively unchanged. Toshiba also makes a full range of drives, though best known for its notebook drives, and retains ~15% of the drive market, with Seagate and WD splitting the lion's share.

There have been no dramatic revolutions in hard drive technology in recent memory; rather, a series of progressive evolutionary improvements that have mainly targeted capacity by increasing the areal density of the platters. Performance improvements do come simply because higher areal density means shorter head movements to read different sectors of the drive. The fastest high capacity 7200 RPM drives now reach 150 MB/s sustained file transfer rates. Big 5400 RPM aren't far behind at around 120MB/s. The slowest current SSDs are at least 2X faster than the fastest HDD.

Sub-6000 RPM 3.5" HDDs have been our go-to quiet high capacity data storage devices for years. The best of these now have performance barely perceptibly slower than typical 7200 RPM drives, and achieve a level of noise and vibration that is staggeringly low by standards less than a decade ago.


Solid State Drives continue making inroads to the mainstream. We tend to mark Intel's entry into the market in Q3 2008 as the starting point of SSDs becoming viable storage options for PC enthusiasts. The prices continue plummeting, so it's just a matter of time before they are in every computer. SSDs are generally silent, make no vibrations, and run extremely cool, all of which makes them ideal for silent computers. We recommend using them for the operating system, at least, and keep to the models that have the best reliability. No SSDs are on our recommended lists; noise is not a criteria to choose them by, though we have run into one or two samples that made some low level electronic whine/squeal.

SSDs for consumers come mainly as 2.5" SATA drives topping out at around 1TB, with the latestest conforming to the SATA3 standard which allows up to 6.0 Gbit/s native transfer rate. There's no need for the extra room of the 3.5" drive form factor, so none have appeared in that size. They are also available in smaller, bare PCB formats for direct plug-in to mobile and desktop motherboards, mSATA and M.2. The fastest, highest capacity and most capable configurations have taken PCIe form, used generally for enterprise and data center applications. The latest development in PCIe SSD technology is NVM Express (NVMe), a scalable host controller interface designed to provide a platform for ever faster data delivery.

Longevity of SSDs is directly related to flash memory's write endurance, which is finite. Intel rates their top consumer drives for "up to 70GB writes per day for five years (compared to the industry typical 20GB)." Kingston rates their top consumer SSDs as capable of 3 Drive Writes Per Day and warranties them for 3 years. The Tech Report started a stress test project on six SSDs in August 2013 to answer the question of how many writes consumer SSDs can take before dying. The answer, after more than a year of continuous hammering, is surpringly upbeat: 3 failures at 700~800TB of writes, another failure at 1.2 Petabytes (1000TB), and 2 more still running at over 1.5PB. None of the SSDs are rated for over ~200TB of writes, and none died without some advance warning.


We used to recommend 2.5" notebook drives for the quietest desktop systems for many years. Notebook drives generally have these advantages over 3.5" drives: Lower noise, less vibration due to lower moving mass, much lower power consumption, and correspondingly less heat.

Despite all of this, some sub-6000 RPM 3.5" desktop drives are now just about as quiet, and in a few cases, quieter, with about as low vibration. Notebook drives are generally slower than desktop drives, and cannot hold a candle to SSDs, which is the main reason we're no longer as enthusiastic about notebook drives.

The typical enthusiast PC configuration today is an SSD of 120~500 GB for the OS and programs, combined with a high capacity 3.5" HDD, say 2 to 6 TB. Even in a small PC, a single 3.5" HDD can be mechanically decoupled in some way to reduce vibration induced noise to a minimum.

The only scenario in which 2.5" HDDs have practical application for a quiet desktop PC these days is when the case is too small for a 3.5" data drive. The most obvious example is an Intel NUC or Gigabyte BRIX with an mSATA slot and room for a single 2.5" drive. The obvious choice of the latter is a large capacity 2.5" HDD, which get up to 2 TB now.


We used to short-list only the quietest drives on the recommended lists. For this iteration, we've changed our methodology: Every drive tested since late 2008 (when they began to be tested our anechoic chamber) is listed, ordered by its level of noise and vibration. Study the data, read the reviews, and pick your own poison.

We test drive performance, but these results don't come into play in our rankings. The performance test results are available in the reviews. We caution against expecting measured differences to be easily or always perceptible. Generally, performance is similar for models of similar basic specifications: Spindle speed, capacity, and areal density. Small differences in HDD performance are almost impossible to appreciate in actual use because there are umpteen bottlenecks and overheads in the PC that obscure such differences. (For an entertaining, informative exposition of this theme, check out Dan's Data's How fast is a hard drive? How long is a piece of string?)

Two assessment factors are worthy of note:

  • Sample variance is a hurdle we cannot overcome without examining random samples from many production batches over a period of time. This is not feasible. The reviews and our rankings are based on a careful assessment of our samples only.
  • Manufacturers sometimes revise products without notice or any change in model number. Even an updated firmware can affect drive noise, as seek strategies can be changed. Keep this in mind when perusing the recommended list; the date of manufacture and the firmware version of our sample is listed.


The noise of a disc drive mounted in a case comes in two forms:

  1. Airborne acoustics is what all drive manufacturers currently specify as the HDD noise. It is the sound that comes from the drive through the air to the observer. This value is measured with the drive suspended in space by wires.
  2. Structure-borne acoustics induced by the drive's vibration during idle and seek is not quantified by HDD makers. This vibrational energy is transmitted to the PC chassis and causes the chassis to act much like a sounding board.

Structure-borne acoustics is the dominant source of HDD-induced PC noise. Seagate's testing has shown that changes in stand-alone drive acoustics had little effect on the overall system acoustics when drives were hard mounted in the chassis. Hence the dramatic noise reduction evident with decoupled mountings such as the NoVibes, SPCR's own elastic suspension, or simply placing the drive on soft foam. The noise emitted by even drives with very quiet stand-alone performance is greatly effected by how it is mounted to a chassis. There is also a useful forum thread on the effectiveness of various HDD decoupled mounting techniques.

There are also two main types of noise:

  • Idle noise - typically a smooth hum or whoosh, caused by the spinning motor and its bearings. Non-FDB drives often exhibit a high pitched whine.
  • Seek noise - a rough, intermittent "clacking" or rapid "chugging" noise caused by head actuator movement during seek, read and write.

Idle and seek noise have both airborne and vibration-induced components. The relative balance between airborne and vibration-induced noise is influenced by the case and the method of installation (i.e, soft vs. hard mounting). In other words, setup affects how a hard drive will sound. This is why we do not produce a unified rating for drive noise, but measure and report both airborne noise and vibration.


Until about 2005, the majority of hard drives on the market used ball-bearing motors, which had a characteristic high pitched whine and other objectionable airborne noise. Since then, the industry has shifted to much quieter FDB (Fluid Dynamic Bearing) motors, with the result that most recent drives are significantly quieter than older drives, sometimes by as much as 10 [email protected] All major drive manufacturers now use FDB motors in their current lineups. If you have a typical non-FDB drive, the simplest way to achieve lower noise (and improved performance) is to swap it for a new drive, almost any new drive.

There are three other factors that affect drive noise:

The number of platters in the drive. The acoustic difference between a single platter drive and a four platter drive is much smaller than between a ball-bearing drive and a FDB drive. In other words, the noise penalty for using a higher capacity drive is not great, especially with FDB bearings. Still, the quietest drives tend to be single platter FDB models.

The difference between idle and seek noise. While a drive idling quietly may not be intrusive, if seek noise is considerably louder than idle noise, it will certainly be noticeable. The smaller the difference between seek and idle noise, the less audible the drive will be. The sound quality of seek in some drives is more tonal and more prominent than in others, even when the measured SPL is the same as in other drives.

Automatic Acoustic Management (AAM). This technology sacrifices some seek latency in favor of softer, quieter seeks. The performance hit is often small enough that AAM is well worth using. With the notable exception of Seagate, all manufacturers these days allow AAM to be enabled, although its effectiveness varies from drive to drive. Not all manufacturers provide a utility to enable and adjust AAM, but many drives work with Hitachi's feature tool.



On the Web

* * *

Discuss this article in the forums.

1 2 Next

Storage - Article Index
Help support this site, buy from one of our affiliate retailers!