Viewing page 3 of 3 pages.
Previous 1 2 3
TESTING
Our socket 775 test bench was used to test the Ultra-120. Details of the system
are outlined below. So far, seven heatsinks have been tested on this system:
The Arctic Cooling Freezer 7
Pro, the Spire Verticool
II, the Arctic Cooling Alpine
7, the Zalman CNPS8000,
the Scythe Ninja, the Thermalright XP-120, and, most recently, the
Apack ZeroTherm BTF80 & BTF90. No other SPCR heatsink test results are
directly comparable with the results of this review. The Pentium 520 used in
this test is cooler than most of Intel's soon-to-be-forgotten Prescott and Presler
chips, but it is still 15-20W hotter than the P4-2.8 Northwood used in our socket
478 HS testing platform. On the other hand, it is also hotter than almost about
every AMD processor on the market, not to mention Intel's new Core 2 Duo chips,
which draw much less power than the Intel 520.

On the test bench...
Test Platform
Measurement & Analysis Tools
The Ultra-120 was tested with a Nexus 120mm fan a very quiet, low airflow
fan that has become our reference for heatsink testing. This may put the Ultra-120
at a slight disadvantage, since our test is biased to favor heatsinks that do
well with low airflow. This reflects our desire for low noise. It is nearly
impossible to build a quiet system with high airflow, so our emphasis
on low airflow is appropriate.
Load testing was accomplished using CPUBurn to stress the processor, and the
graph function in SpeedFan was used to make sure that the load temperature was
stable for at least ten minutes.
The ambient conditions during testing were 16 dBA and 23°C.
TEST RESULTS
| Thermalright Ultra-120 with Nexus 120mm fan |
|
Fan Voltage
|
Temp
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W MP
|
°C/W TDP
|
Noise
(dBA@1m)
|
|
12V
|
39°C
|
16
|
0.16
|
0.19
|
23
|
|
9V
|
42°C
|
19
|
0.19
|
0.23
|
20
|
|
7V
|
46°C
|
23
|
0.23
|
0.27
|
18
|
|
5V
|
52°C
|
29
|
0.29
|
0.35
|
<17
|
|
Load Temp: CPUBurn for ~20 mins.
°C Rise: Temperature rise above ambient at load.
°C/W MP / TDP: Temperature rise over ambient per Watt of CPU heat,
based on CPU's Maximum Power (100W) or Thermal Design Power (84W) rating
(lower is better)
Noise: SPL measured in dBA@1m distance with high accuracy B &
K SLM
|
The acoustic characteristics of the Nexus 120mm fan have been documented extensive in previews articles and reviews,
so a detailed analysis of the noise will not be provided here. Listening from a
distance of one meter in our quiet lab, it is very quiet at full speed, barely
audible at 9V, and completely inaudible below 7V. The noise is smooth and low
and motor noise is almost nonexistent below 9V. In the 7~9V range where it is
most likely to be used, the dominant noise is a slight whoosh of air turbulence.
As the numbers show, the Ultra-120 is an excellent performer, we do not doubt
that it is capable of cooling our hot test processor inaudibly, as the temperature
is acceptable even at 5V. Unless heavy overclocking is involved, the only current processors that may need a faster fan are Intel's
hot 8xx and 9xx series, which we'll be happy to wave goodbye to soon.
COMPARISON
Just how good is performance? A direct comparison, using the same fan, is really
the only way to know. Fortunately, we have tested our current champion, the
Scythe Ninja, as well as a Thermalright XP-120 using the same fan on the same
test bed, so it is easy to see which heatsink performs best:
| Heavyweight Heatsink Comparison with Nexus
120mm fan |
|
Fan Voltage
|
Noise
(dBA@1m)
|
XP-120
|
Scythe Ninja
|
Ultra-120
|
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
|
12V
|
23
|
24
|
0.24
|
19
|
0.19
|
16
|
0.16
|
|
9V
|
20
|
27
|
0.27
|
22
|
0.22
|
19
|
0.19
|
|
7V
|
18
|
32
|
0.32
|
24
|
0.24
|
23
|
0.23
|
|
5V
|
<17
|
47
|
0.47
|
29
|
0.29
|
29
|
0.29
|
|
°C Rise: Temperature rise above ambient at load.
°C/W MP: Temperature rise over ambient per Watt of CPU heat,
based on CPU's Maximum Power (100W) rating
(lower is better)
Noise: SPL measured in dBA@1m distance with high accuracy B &
K SLM
|
In this case, numbers tell the story better than words. The Ultra-120 beat
the Ninja at every voltage level except the lowest, where the two were equal.
The victory wasn't large or earth-shattering, just two or three degrees, but it was there. The XP-120 a one time champion at SPCR
is a distant third in all cases, clearly unable to compete at such low airflow.
As exciting as it is to crown a new heatsink king, the results here bear putting
into perspective. The Ultra-120 did not win by a knockout the way the Ninja
did when it first showed up. Its victory was hard-fought, and it's quite likely
the results could have been different in a slightly different setup. And
let's be honest the Ninja is already good enough to cool the vast majority
of systems without increasing system noise. The Ultra-120 can make the same
claim, but the difference isn't enough to justify an upgrade from one
to the other.
If noise is not a concern, we wholeheartedly recommend the Ultra-120. The difference
between the Ultra-120 and the Ninja was greatest when the fan was at full speed,
which suggests that the gap between the two would be wider with a higher airflow
hand. On the other hand, the Ninja is specifically designed for fanless operation,
and is almost certainly a better choice for a passively cooled processor.
NOISE RECORDINGS IN MP3 FORMAT
Nexus 120mm fan: 5V-7V-9V-12V, 5s Ambient between
levels: One
Meter, One Foot
Comparatives:
APack ZeroTherm BTF80 & BTF90: 5V-7V-9V-12V, 5s
Ambient between levels: One
Meter, One Foot
Arctic Cooling Alpine 64: 5V-7V-9V-12V, 5s Ambient
between levels: One
Meter, One Foot
Scythe Mine w/ stock fan: 5V-7V-9V-12V, 5s Ambient
between levels: One
Meter, One Foot
|
HOW TO LISTEN & COMPARE
These recordings were made
with a high resolution, studio quality, digital recording system and are
intended to represent a quick snapshot of what we heard during the review.
Two recordings of each noise level were made, one from a distance of one
meter, and another from one foot away.
The one meter recording is
intended to give you an idea of how the subject of this review sound in
actual use one meter is a reasonable typical distance between a
computer or computer component and your ear. The recording contains stretches
of ambient noise that you can use to judge the relative loudness of the
subject. For best results, set your volume control so that the ambient
noise is just barely audible. Be aware that very quiet subjects may not
be audible if we couldn't hear it from one meter, chances are we
couldn't record it either!
The one foot recording is
designed to bring out the fine details of the noise. Use this recording
with caution! Although more detailed, it may not represent how the subject
sounds in actual use. It is best to listen to this recording after you
have listened to the one meter recording.
|
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
The Ultra-120 is the most efficient heatsink we've
tested, and ultimately, that's what counts. Despite concerns over fin spacing,
it managed to beat the Scythe Ninja, even with our tough low-airflow test. Unless
you're planning to cool the CPU passively, you can't do better than the Ultra-120.
The installation system is simple and easy to use, and should have full support
for AM2 in the near future. Until then, the K8 clip for the HR-01 is a good
substitute.
The biggest drawback is that with the K8 mounting hardware, the heatsink fan's orientation is dictated by the orientation of the motherboard's heatsink retention bracket. If it runs "east-west", the fan will be positioned to blow towards the back panel. This is the preferred orientation, because the hot air will be exhausted by the back panel case fan than almost every system will have. If the HS retention bracket orientation is "north-south", the fan on the Ultra-120 will blow up towards the power supply, which may cause its internal fan to ramp up in speed and become noisier under load.
The lack of a fan may also be a
drawback for some, although most silencers will want to pick their own anyway.
Just remember to choose a fan with open screw mounting flanges or be prepared to modify
one with closed flanges. The only other quibble is that
it may be too large to fit into some systems, but the same applies to just about
every high-end heatsink these days.
A year after yielding the cooling throne to the upstart Scythe, Thermalright
is back on top. We're happy to see it: Competition
is sure to spur more development and perhaps help prices fall.
|
Pros
* Top-notch performance
* Inaudible cooling is possible with the right fan
* Simple installation procedure
* Well packaged
* Silicone strips help damp fan noise
* Relatively inexpensive
|
Cons
* No fan included
* Fan clips are difficult to install
* Very large and heavy
* Fan direction not user-adjustable with AMD clips
|
Much thanks to Thermalright for the review sample.
* * *
Articles of Related Interest
Recommended Heatsinks
Thermalright HR-01 CPU
Heatsink
Scythe SCNJ-1000 Ninja
Heatsink
Thermalright XP-120:
1st 120mm fan CPU Heatsink
* * *
Comment
on this article in our Forums.
| Help support this site, buy the Thermalright Ultra-120 Tower Heatsink for LGA775 & K8 (754 / 939 / 940) from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|