Superquiet Superclocked DIY Core 2 Duo System

Do-It-Yourself Systems
Viewing page 1 of 6 pages. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
SPCR Article Oct 2, 2006 by Chris Thomson (cmthomson at comcast dot net)

Chris has been a computer system architect at Myrias Research, Amdahl, 3Com, Nokia and others for the last 20+ years. An ex-pat Canadian, he now resides in sunny Pleasanton, CA. Chris used to think that people who build their own PCs and then overclock them are nuts. Over the last year or so, he's become convinced of it. Chris caught the silent PC bug while building a hot Pentium D 830 dual-core system a year ago, and has become an active SPCR member. This article describes a complete upgrade to an overclocked Core 2 Duo system that is quiet enough to make his laptop PC seem outrageously loud.

* * *


After my excruciating effort to quietly cool the 150W space heater marketed under the moniker Pentium D 830 (documented on SPCR in two parts, Quiet DIY OC'ed Pentium D 830 System and Quiet DIY OC'ed Pentium D 830 System, Part Two), California summer arrived, and the temperature-controlled fans in my system kept going faster and faster and got noisier and noisier. I started to get antsy about upgrading my system to the next generation CPU, both for lower wattage and for better performance.

In the last year, three major events have impacted quiet high-performance PCs: the introduction of the Core 2 Duo "Conroe" CPUs from Intel, the relentless race by video card GPU vendors for higher performance regardless of power consumption, and the catch-up race of heat sink vendors to cool those GPUs. Two good, one not so good.

Of these, the Conroe is probably the most significant. Not only is the power consumption far lower (as much as a 2/3 reduction), but the performance has been boosted substantially, particularly for audio and video transcoding, the most common compute-bound tasks I do. This is because the cache is very large (4 MB on the E6600) and the execution units have twice as many SSE stations as previous CPU cores.

The "core" of my upgrade.

The performance increase in GPUs is also impressive: the newer 7900GT outperforms my old X800XL by almost 2:1, and it is not even a top performer anymore. It is, however, a very good compromise of performance, price, and power consumption.

Time has marched on for memories as well. My old 5400C4 memory was looking pretty sad next to newer 6400C3 sticks. Even my old DVD writer was looking tired. And of course it was time to replace that CRT with an LCD.

In revamping my system, I set the bar high for myself: a system at least twice as fast as the old one, and so quiet it couldn't be heard at 6am on Sunday. By starting with a large well-damped case, using gigantic heat sinks and very slow fans, minimizing the system airflow impedance, ducting hot air directly out of the box, and overclocking fast components to almost overload the heat sinks, I was completely successful.


As the old carpenter said: "I've had that same hammer for 25 years, although I've gone through four handles and two heads." I still have the same system, it just has a new CPU, motherboard, memory, video card, DVD burner and monitor. Here is the complete configuration:

  • Antec P180 case (the original silver/black one)
  • Antec Phantom 500 semi-fanless power supply
  • Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 CPU
  • Asus P5W DH Deluxe motherboard
  • 2 GB G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ memory
  • eVGA 7900 GT KO SC (N567) video card
  • ATI TV Wonder Elite TV card
  • Samsung 244T 24" LCD monitor
  • two Samsung SpinPoint SP2004C 200-GB SATA disks
  • Sony DRU820A DVD burner
  • generic floppy drive
  • Scythe Ninja CPU heat sink
  • Thernalright HR-05 north bridge heat sink
  • Aerocase Condor GPU heat sink
  • Swiftech MC14 copper RAMsinks
  • Scythe Kama Bay filtered air inlet
  • Nexus Real Silent 120mm orange fans
  • Noise Magic NMT-3 temperature-sensitive fan controllers
  • AcoustiPack foam
  • home made styrene ducts and baffles
  • various peripherals (UPS, printer, zip drive, speakers, keyboard, mouse, etc)
In the rest of this article, I'm going to document the system as though it had been built from scratch. In actuality, most parts were carried forward unmodified from my old 830D configuration. Most of the concepts are also documented in my earlier 830D articles, along with credits to SPCR members who suggested them.


The E6600 is rated at 65W TDP (thermal design point), and actually consumes closer to 55W. I knew that cooling it would be straightforward, but experience with my old 830D/P5LD2 configuration left me concerned about cooling the motherboard components, especially the Vcore VRM (voltage regulator module). And of course the 95W video card would need some attention.

Two of the new Conroe-ready motherboards caught my eye: the Gigabit GA-965P-DQ6 and the Asus P5W DH Deluxe. Both feature heat pipes from the north bridge to radiators near the CPU, as well as radiators for the VRM MOSFETs, also near the CPU. In addition to good VRM cooling, these boards also use highly efficient multiphase VRMs (12 and 8 phase, respectively).

This made me think that I could cool the CPU with a Thermalright XP-120 heat sink with the fan blowing up from the motherboard, which would force cool air through those north bridge and VRM radiators. I would then duct the warm air straight out one of the case holes. This would eliminate the need for a case fan, since the motherboard and CPU would be sharing a fan. The video and TV cards would be cooled separately.

I initially tried the DQ6 motherboard, but it was not a happy experience. The 965P north bridge actually has fewer features than the 945P on my old motherboard, and would not allow me to directly control the DRAM parameters. Also the BIOS is set up for overvolting and overclocking only; it is not possible to set voltages directly, or below the stock values called for by the VID and SPD. I ended up selling the board and switching to the P5W DH, which uses a 975X north bridge and has the features I wanted.

With the P5W DH, the XP-120 can be mounted in the "standard" orientation, with the heat pipe bends toward the DIMMs, or rotated with them facing the top of the case. The latter is better, as it provides a larger space between the heat sink and the case outlet, allowing for a larger duct with smoother bends. It is also easier to mount in this direction because there is more room around the clips. Here is what the XP-120 looked like installed in the P180.

XP-120 mounted on P5W inside P180
XP-120 CPU heat sink mounted on the P5W DH inside the P180 case.

Note how the heat sink lines up quite well with the hole in the case. I never actually built the duct, but it would have been quite simple. Note also that I ran the CPU power cable under the motherboard.

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Do-It-Yourself Systems - Article Index
Help support this site, buy from one of our affiliate retailers!