Viewing page 4 of 5 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
TESTING
Testing was done according to our
unique heatsink testing methodology, and the reference fan was profiled
using our standard fan testing
methodology. A quick summary of the components, tools, and procedures follows
below.
Key Components in Heatsink Test Platform:
Test Tools
- Seasonic
Power Angel for measuring AC power at the wall to ensure that the
heat output remains consistent.
- Custom-built, four-channel variable DC power supply, used to regulate
the fan speed during the test.
- Bruel & Kjaer (B&K) model 2203 Sound Level Meter. Used to
accurately measure noise down to 20 dBA and below.
- Various other tools for testing fans, as documented in our
standard fan testing methodology.
Software Tools
- SpeedFan
4.31, used to monitor the on-chip thermal sensor. This sensor is not
calibrated, so results are not universally applicable; however,
- CPUBurn
P6, used to stress the CPU heavily, generating more heat that most
realistic loads. Two instances are used to ensure that both cores are stressed.
- Throttlewatch
2.01, used to monitor the throttling feature of the CPU to determine
when overheating occurs.
Noise measurements were made with the fan powered from the lab variable DC
power supply while the rest of the system was off to ensure that system noise
did not skew the measurements.
Load testing was accomplished using CPUBurn to stress the processor, and the
graph function in SpeedFan was used to make sure that the load temperature was
stable for at least ten minutes. The fan was tested at four voltages: 5V, 7V,
9V, and 12V, representing a full cross-section of the its airflow and noise
performance.
The ambient conditions during testing were 18 dBA and 22°C.
TEST RESULTS
The Fan
The stock fan is the same model supplied with the Infinity. We found the earlier
sample to be one of the quietest stock heatsink fans ever, and similar to our
reference fan. This second sample was just about identical to the first.
Unlike the sample that came with the Infinity, this sample displayed no audible
clicking or chuffing at any angle or speed. We had suspected the earlier sample
was damaged; our experience with this sample confirms the suspicion. At the
same CFM, the Scythe and the reference fan sounded just about identical, and
they performed identically with the Andy on the test bench.
|
Stock Fan Profile: Scythe DFS122512
|
| Brand |
Scythe |
Power Rating |
0.18A |
| Manufacturer |
?? |
Airflow Rating |
49.58 CFM |
| Model Number |
TT-1225 |
RPM Rating |
1,200 ± 10% RPM |
| Bearing Type |
Sleeve |
Noise Rating |
20.94 dBA |
| Hub Size |
1.59" |
Header Type |
3-pin |
| Frame Size |
120 x 120 x 25 mm |
Starting Voltage |
4.6V |
|
Voltage
|
Noise
|
RPM
|
CFM
|
Power
|
|
12V
|
24 dBA@1m
|
1200 RPM
|
54 CFM
|
1.08W
|
|
9V
|
20 dBA@1m
|
960 RPM
|
42 CFM
|
0.83W
|
|
7V
|
19 dBA@1m
|
790 RPM
|
32 CFM
|
0.68W
|
|
5V
|
<18 dBA@1m
|
570 RPM
|
21 CFM
|
0.53W
|
|
@25 cfm (5.5V)
|
<18 dBA@1m
|
620 RPM
|
24 CFM
|
0.57W
|
At 12V, we'd characterize both fans as being smooth and very quiet but audible,
with the nod going to the slower Nexus. The Scythe has a bit more growl that
disappears below 7V. At 9V, a similar difference was heard but much reduced.
Given the typical ambient noise for most homes (and certainly offices), many
users will find either fan inaudible at this voltage. Both fans were just barely
audible at 7V and inaudible from one meter at 5V.
Cooling Performance
| Scythe Andy Samurai Master w/ stock or reference
120 fan |
|
Fan Voltage
|
Temp
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
|
12V
|
38°C
|
16
|
0.21
|
|
9V
|
42°C
|
20
|
0.26
|
|
7V
|
46°C
|
24
|
0.30
|
|
5V
|
51°C
|
29
|
0.37
|
|
Load Temp: CPUBurn for ~20 mins.
°C Rise: Temperature rise above ambient (22°C) at load.
°C/W MP / TDP: based on the amount of heat dissipated by the CPU
(measured 78W); lower is better.
|
| Scythe Andy vs. Scythe Ninja vs. Thermalright
Ultra-120 |
|
Fan Voltage
|
Scythe Andy
|
Scythe Ninja
|
Ultra-120
|
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
|
12V
|
16
|
0.21
|
14
|
0.18
|
15
|
0.19
|
|
9V
|
20
|
0.26
|
16
|
0.20
|
17
|
0.21
|
|
7V
|
24
|
0.30
|
17
|
0.21
|
21
|
0.27
|
Fan @ 12V: The stock fan was quiet at full speed, which is unusual.
It was quieter than just about any other stock heatsink/fan we've tested,
except for the Scythe Infinity, which came with the same model of fan. The
noise consisted of a smooth midrange hum and slight low frequency growl that
was easy to tune out. Compared to the Nexus, the stock fan sounded more tonal
but produced less turbulence noise.
The cooling performance was excellent, very close to the Scythe Ninja and
Thermalright Ultra-120, which are the top dogs in our entire database of tested
heatsinks. Differences of 1~2°C are generally too close to the margin of error
to call definitive, so you could say that the aforementioned models and the
Andy have essentially the same cooling performance with this level of airflow.
Fan @ 9V: The stock fan actually became quiet enough to be considered
an acoustic non-factor in most systems. It is a challenge to build a system
that is quieter than the stock fan at this voltage for many people,
there may be no acoustic benefit to slowing the fan any further.
Performance remained very good, but the lead of the Ninja and Ultra 120 increased
increased to 3-4C, which is significant. The tighter spacing of the ASM's
fins was beginning to show their effect.
Fan @ 7V: At this level, the Nexus fan and the stock fan were both
basically inaudible from one meter. There would be little point in reducing
the fan speed any more. In a system with other sources of noise, the difference
would not be heard. Only a slight low frequency hum let us know that the stock
fan was spinning, and that was audible only when closely listened for.
The Andy's performance fell further from the Ninja and Ultra-120. We expect
this is due to the higher impedance of the tighter spacing between fins, interleaved
or not. For most systems, the performance is still good enough for safe temperatures.
Fan @ 5V: Both fans were inaudible from one meter at this level. The
29°C temperature rise is borderline peformance, however. The temperature inside
a case could be easily 10°C higher than the 22°C measured on our open bench.
This would mean a CPU temperature in excess of 62°C, which is still within
safe limits, but getting close. There's no real acoustic advantage to running
the fan this slow, so this data is not really that relevant.
ANDY VS. INFINITY VS. SI-128
It's an obvious comparison: The Infinity is Scythe's previous "interleaved"
fin heatsink, while the SI-128 is the closest competition from Thermalright,
except, of course, that it is a lot smaller and has 1/3 fewer heatpipes. (Note:
The Infinity was retested on the new heatsink testing platform with the fan
mounted on the wide side. The results here are slightly different than in the
original Infinity review, which used a different CPU and motherboard.)
| Scythe Andy vs. Scythe Infinity vs. Thermalright
SI-128 |
|
Fan Voltage
|
Andy
|
Infinity
|
SI-128
|
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
°C Rise
|
°C/W
|
|
12V
|
16
|
0.21
|
16
|
0.21
|
21
|
0.27
|
|
9V
|
20
|
0.26
|
18
|
0.23
|
26
|
0.33
|
|
7V
|
24
|
0.30
|
20
|
0.26
|
29
|
0.37
|
The two Scythe heatsinks performed the same wth the fan at 12V. As the airflow
was reduced, the Infinity took the lead pretty decisively. The Thermalright
is clearly disadvantaged by its smaller size. It's in a different class altogether.
| Help support this site, buy the Scythe Andy Samurai Master from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|