Viewing page 4 of 5 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
TESTING
For a fuller understanding of ATX power supplies, please read
the reference article Power
Supply Fundamentals & Recommended Units.
Those who seek source materials can find Intel's various PSU design
guides at Form Factors.
For a complete rundown of testing equipment and procedures,
please refer to SPCR's PSU Test Platform V.4.
The testing system is a close simulation of a moderate airflow
mid-tower PC optimized for low noise.
In the test rig, the ambient temperature of the PSU varies
proportionately with its output load, which is exactly the way it is in
a real PC environment. But there is the added benefit of a high power
load tester which allows incremental load testing all the way to full
power for any non-industrial PC power supply. Both fan noise and
voltage are measured at various standard loads. It is, in general, a
very demanding test, as the operating ambient temperature of the PSU
often reaches >40°C at full power. This is
impossible to achieve with an open test bench setup.
The 120mm fan responsible for "case airflow" is deliberately
run at a steady low level (~6-7V) when the system is run at "low"
loads. When the test loads become greater, the 120mm fan is turned up
to a higher speed, but one that doesn't affect the noise level of the
overall system. Anyone who is running a system that draws 400W or more
would definitely want more than 20CFM of airflow through their case,
and at this point, the noise level of the exhaust fan is typically not
the greatest concern.
Great effort has been made to devise as realistic
an operating environment for the PSU as possible, but the thermal and
noise results obtained here still cannot be considered absolute. There
are too many variables in PCs and too many possible combinations of
components for any single test environment to provide infallible
results. And there is always the bugaboo of sample variance. These
results are akin to a resume, a few detailed photographs, and some
short sound bites of someone you've never met. You'll probably get a
pretty good overall representation, but it is not quite the same as an
extended meeting in person.
SPCR's
high fidelity sound recording system was used to
create MP3 sound files of this PSU. As with the setup for recording
fans, the position of the mic was 3" from the exhaust vent at a 45°
angle, outside the airflow turbulence area. The photo below shows the
setup (a different PSU is being recorded). All other noise sources in
the room were turned off while making the sound recordings.
INTERPRETING TEMPERATURE DATA
It important to keep in mind that fan speed varies with temperature,
not output load. A power supply generates more heat as output
increases, but is not the only the only factor that affects fan speed.
Ambient temperature and case airflow have almost as much effect. Our
test rig represents a challenging thermal situation for a power supply:
A large portion of the heat generated inside the case must be exhausted
through the power supply, which causes a corresponding increase in fan
speed.
When examining thermal data, the most important indicator of
cooling efficiency is the difference
between intake and exhaust. Because the heat generated in the PSU
loader by the output of the PSU is always the same for a given power
level, the intake temperature should be roughly the same between
different tests. The only external variable is the ambient room
temperature. The temperature of the exhaust air from the PSU is
affected by several factors:
- Intake temperature (determined by ambient temperature and
power output level)
- Efficiency of the PSU (how much heat it generates while
producing the required output)
- The effectiveness of the PSU's cooling system, which is
comprised of:
- Overall mechanical and airflow design
- Size, shape and overall surface area of heatsinks
- Fan(s) and fan speed control circuit
The thermal rise in the power supply is really the only indicator
we have about all of the above. This is why the intake temperature is important:
It represents the ambient temperature around the power supply itself. Subtracting
the intake temperature from the exhaust temperature gives a reasonable gauge
of the effectiveness of the power supply's cooling system. This is the only
temperature number that is comparable between different reviews, as it is unaffected
by the ambient temperature.
TEST RESULTS
Ambient conditions during testing were 21°C and 20 dBA. AC input was 121V,
60Hz.
|
OUTPUT, VOLTAGE REGULATION & EFFICIENCY: Seasonic
M12II-430
|
|
DC Output Voltage (V) + Current (A)
|
Total DC Output
|
AC Input
|
Calculated Efficiency
|
|
+12V1
|
+12V2
|
+5V
|
+3.3V
|
-12V
|
+5VSB
|
|
12.18
|
0.96
|
12.18
|
–
|
5.02
|
0.96
|
3.30
|
0.92
|
|
0.1
|
20.0
|
30.3
|
66.2%
|
|
12.15
|
0.96
|
12.15
|
1.72
|
5.03
|
0.96
|
3.30
|
0.92
|
0.1
|
0.2
|
42.6
|
56.9
|
74.9%
|
|
12.17
|
1.87
|
12.17
|
1.73
|
5.01
|
2.84
|
3.30
|
0.91
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
64.2
|
81.7
|
78.6%
|
|
12.16
|
3.73
|
12.15
|
1.71
|
4.99
|
2.84
|
3.29
|
1.75
|
0.2
|
0.5
|
91.0
|
111.8
|
81.4%
|
|
12.16
|
3.73
|
12.11
|
4.96
|
4.98
|
4.43
|
3.31
|
4.37
|
0.3
|
0.9
|
150.0
|
180.5
|
83.1%
|
|
12.15
|
5.48
|
12.06
|
6.38
|
4.96
|
6.06
|
3.28
|
5.06
|
0.4
|
1.2
|
201.0
|
237
|
84.8%
|
|
12.12
|
7.55
|
12.05
|
8.05
|
4.95
|
6.19
|
3.30
|
5.92
|
0.5
|
1.5
|
252.2
|
298
|
84.6%
|
|
12.12
|
8.51
|
12.03
|
9.55
|
4.94
|
7.92
|
3.29
|
8.12
|
0.6
|
1.7
|
299.6
|
359
|
83.4%
|
|
12.11
|
12.79
|
12.00
|
12.55
|
4.89
|
12.49
|
3.28
|
12.43
|
0.8
|
2.5
|
429.4
|
535
|
80.3%
|
|
Crossload Test*
|
|
11.70
|
14.58
|
11.56
|
14.96
|
5.12
|
0.98
|
3.28
|
0.93
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
351.1
|
431
|
81.6%
|
|
+12V Ripple (peak-to-peak): 22mV @ 90W, rising to a max of 53mV @ full load
+5V Ripple (peak-to-peak): 16mV@ 90W, rising to a max of 26mV @ full load
+3.3V Ripple (peak-to-peak): 13mV@ 90W, rising to a max of 22mV @ full load
|
|
*For the crossload test, the 12V line is maximized,
and the +5V and +3.3V lines are set to just 1A.
NOTE: The current and voltage for -12V and +5VSB lines is not measured
but based on switch settings of the DBS-2100 PS Loader. It is a tiny portion
of the total, and potential errors arising from inaccuracies on these
lines is <1W.
|
|
OTHER DATA SUMMARY: Seasonic M12II-430
|
|
DC Output (W)
|
20.0
|
42.6
|
64.2
|
91.0
|
150.0
|
201.0
|
252.2
|
299.6
|
429.4
|
|
Intake Temp (°C)
|
20
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
26
|
24
|
26
|
28
|
29
|
|
Exhaust Temp (°C)
|
24
|
26
|
27
|
30
|
36
|
40
|
40
|
41
|
46
|
|
Temp Rise (°C)
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
8
|
10
|
16
|
14
|
13
|
17
|
| Fan Voltage (V) |
4.1
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
4.1
|
4.6
|
6.1
|
8.1
|
11.1
|
| SPL (dBA@1m) |
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
21
|
24
|
28
|
35
|
41
|
|
Power Factor
|
0.93
|
0.97
|
0.98
|
0.99
|
1.00
|
0.98
|
0.99
|
0.99
|
1.00
|
AC Power in Standby: 1.3W / 0.28 PF
AC Power with No Load, PSU power On: 6.7W / 0.77 PF
|
|
NOTE: The ambient room temperature during
testing can vary a few degrees from review to review. Please take this
into account when comparing PSU test data.
|
ANALYSIS
1. EFFICIENCY
The M12-II is 80-Plus certified,
so we already know it's efficient. Our test sample reached its peak of almost
85% around 200~250W right where a high end system is likely draw it's
peak power consumption. At the lower end, it hit 66% at 20W and 75% at 40W,
which are excellent results. Bear in mind that most systems spend most of
their time idling within this range.
All these results are are within a percent or two of the
results we got for S12II-380. There's little doubt the two models are
based off the same circuit, though the S12II-380 had a slightly tweaked efficiency
curve appropriate to it's lower capacity.
2. VOLTAGE REGULATION was excellent under ordinary test conditions,
staying within ±3% though all the normal tests. The crossload test
stressed things a little more, pushing the +12V line to as low as 11.56V,
but this is well above the minimum acceptable voltage of 11.40V. The crossload
test is tougher than any realistic load, and it's unlikely the lines will
ever be stressed like this in real usage.
3. RIPPLE was higher than the recently reviewed S12II-380, but still well within the ATX12V specification, and modest compared to most tested power supplies.
4. POWER FACTOR was close to perfect across all loads, as is the norm
for most power supplies with active correction circuitry. It wasn't quite
perfect at the very low end, with a ratio of 0.93 at 20W, but this is a lower
load than the M12-II will ever realistically face.
5. LOW LOAD TESTING revealed no problems starting at low loads, and power
consumption with no load was stellar at 6.7W.
6. TEMPERATURE & COOLING
It's difficult to know exactly what to think of the cooling system in the
M12-II. As noted, the cooling system in Seasonic's "II" series power
supplies has been heavily tweaked, and there is now much more space for air
flow freely through the power supply.
The thermal measurements didn't reveal much results were in line with
most other power supplies we've tested. However, there was a bit of an anomaly
just as the fan began to speed up at ~200W: Here, the intake temperature dropped
slightly as the increased fan speed suddenly began to pump hot air out of
the test box at a faster rate. As a result, the thermal difference between
intake and exhaust jumped suddenly and then decreased at the next point
of measurement. It's not clear whether this anomaly can be attributed to the
better airflow through the M12-II or not. In any case, there's little question this PSU can keep itself cool.
7. FAN, FAN CONTROLLER and NOISE
The fan controller started just below 4V, and climbed up to stabilize at
4.1V. This is normal behavior for Seasonics. The noise level at 4.1V was residual,
measuring just barely above ambient. Qualitatively, the noise was a very low, smooth
hum.
The fan controller began to increase at the 200W mark a little lower
than we would like, and earlier than Seasonic's other recent models, including
the S12-II. Above 200W, the noise was beginning to become intrusive, and by 250W,
it was definitely too loud. The fan controller seemed to react more quickly than usual for a Seasonic
to changes in load, and the changes in fan speed were audible. However,
once the controller picked its level, it stayed at a more or less constant
voltage without audible wavering. The steeper noise to temperature (or load) curve could be due in part to the higher air turbulence noise that quarter-area plastic baffle over the fan must create at higher velocity.
| Help support this site, buy from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|