Corsair TX650W ATX12V power supply

Power
Viewing page 4 of 5 pages. Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

TESTING

For a fuller understanding of ATX power supplies, please read the reference article Power Supply Fundamentals & Recommended Units. Those who seek source materials can find Intel's various PSU design guides at Form Factors.

For a complete rundown of testing equipment and procedures, please refer to SPCR's PSU Test Platform V.4.1. The testing system is a close simulation of a moderate airflow mid-tower PC optimized for low noise.

In the test rig, the ambient temperature of the PSU varies proportionately with its output load, which is exactly the way it is in a real PC environment. But there is the added benefit of a high power load tester which allows incremental load testing all the way to full power for any non-industrial PC power supply. Both fan noise and voltage are measured at various standard loads. It is, in general, a very demanding test, as the operating ambient temperature of the PSU often reaches >40°C at full power. This is impossible to achieve with an open test bench setup.

The 120mm fan responsible for "case airflow" is deliberately run at a steady low level (~6-7V) when the system is run at "low" loads. When the test loads become greater, the 120mm fan is turned up to a higher speed, but one that doesn't affect the noise level of the overall system. Anyone who is running a system that draws 400W or more would definitely want more than 20CFM of airflow through their case, and at this point, the noise level of the exhaust fan is typically not the greatest concern.

Great effort has been made to devise as realistic an operating environment for the PSU as possible, but the thermal and noise results obtained here still cannot be considered absolute. There are too many variables in PCs and too many possible combinations of components for any single test environment to provide infallible results. And there is always the bugaboo of sample variance. These results are akin to a resume, a few detailed photographs, and some short sound bites of someone you've never met. You'll probably get a pretty good overall representation, but it is not quite the same as an extended meeting in person.

REAL SYSTEM POWER NEEDS: While our testing loads the PSU to full output (even 600W!) in order to verify the manufacturer's claims, real desktop PCs simply do not require anywhere near this level of power. The most pertinent range of DC output power is between about 40W and 300W, because it is the power range where most systems will be working most of the time. To illustrate this point, we conducted system tests to measure the power draw of several actual systems under idle and worst-case conditions. Our most power-hungry overclocked 130W TDP processor rig with an ATI Radeon X1950XTX-512 graphics card drew ~256W DC peak from the power supply under full load — well within the capabilities of any modern power supply. Please follow the link provided above to see the details. It is true that very elaborate systems with the most power hungry dual video cards today might draw as much as another 150W, but the total should remain under 500W in extrapolations of our real world measurements.

SPCR's high fidelity sound recording system was used to create MP3 sound files of this PSU. As with the setup for recording fans, the position of the mic was 3" from the exhaust vent at a 45° angle, outside the airflow turbulence area. The photo below shows the setup (a different PSU is being recorded). All other noise sources in the room were turned off while making the sound recordings.

INTERPRETING TEMPERATURE DATA

It important to keep in mind that fan speed varies with temperature, not output load. A power supply generates more heat as output increases, but is not the only the only factor that affects fan speed. Ambient temperature and case airflow have almost as much effect. Our test rig represents a challenging thermal situation for a power supply: A large portion of the heat generated inside the case must be exhausted through the power supply, which causes a corresponding increase in fan speed.

When examining thermal data, the most important indicator of cooling efficiency is the difference between intake and exhaust. Because the heat generated in the PSU loader by the output of the PSU is always the same for a given power level, the intake temperature should be roughly the same between different tests. The only external variable is the ambient room temperature. The temperature of the exhaust air from the PSU is affected by several factors:

  • Intake temperature (determined by ambient temperature and power output level)
  • Efficiency of the PSU (how much heat it generates while producing the required output)
  • The effectiveness of the PSU's cooling system, which is comprised of:
    • Overall mechanical and airflow design
    • Size, shape and overall surface area of heatsinks
    • Fan(s) and fan speed control circuit

The thermal rise in the power supply is really the only indicator we have about all of the above. This is why the intake temperature is important: It represents the ambient temperature around the power supply itself. Subtracting the intake temperature from the exhaust temperature gives a reasonable gauge of the effectiveness of the power supply's cooling system. This is the only temperature number that is comparable between different reviews, as it is unaffected by the ambient temperature.

TEST RESULTS

Note that even though the TX650W has only one 12V line, two separate load banks were used for the 12V loading. The SPCR load tester does not have the capacity to load up 50A on a single 12V line. Hence the 12V1 and 12V2 columns.

OUTPUT, VOLTAGE REGULATION & EFFICIENCY: Corsair TX650W
DC Output Voltage (V) + Current (A)
Total DC Output
AC Input
Calculated Efficiency
+12V1
+12V2
+5V
+3.3V
-12V
+5VSB
12.10
0.96
12.10
0
5.01
0.97
3.38
0.96
0.1
0.1
21.4
34
62.9%
12.10
0.93
12.10
1.71
5.01
0.97
3.38
0.96
0.1
0.1
41.5
59
70.9%
12.10
2.74
12.10
1.71
5.01
1.94
3.38
0.96
0.1
0.3
64.3
81
77.5%
12.07
2.82
12.07
1.71
4.99
2.85
3.38
1.79
0.2
0.5
89.4
109
81.9%
12.07
4.32
12.07
4.90
4.99
2.85
3.38
3.58
0.2
0.7
150.0
184
81.6%
12.04
5.82
12.04
6.52
4.99
4.45
3.36
5.10
0.4
1.0
199.3
241
83.1%
12.00
7.91
12.00
8.01
4.98
6.98
3.35
7.17
0.7
1.5
250.2
304
82.3%
12.00
9.34
12.00
9.59
4.98
6.99
3.34
8.21
0.7
1.5
301.8
361
83.6%
11.90
12.64
11.90
12.80
4.96
7.84
3.32
9.06
0.7
1.9
403.9
499
80.9%
11.90
16.00
11.90
16.83
4.90
10.47
3.27
10.73
0.7
2.4
510.7
636
80.3%
11.83
15.50
11.83
26.50
4.85
12.71
3.22
12.78
0.7
3.0
651.0
824
80.6%
Crossload Test
11.96
18.70
11.96
29.00
4.97
0.98
3.39
0.9
0.1
0.1
580.2
720
82.3%
+12V Ripple (peak-to-peak): 15mV @ 200W ~ 94mV @ 651W (max)
+5V Ripple (peak-to-peak): 12mV @ 200W ~ 26mV @ 651W (max)
+3.3V Ripple (peak-to-peak): 11mV @ 200W ~ 19mV @ 651W (max)
NOTE: The current and voltage for -12V and +5VSB lines is not measured but based on switch settings of the DBS-2100 PS Loader. It is a tiny portion of the total, and potential errors arising from inaccuracies on these lines is <1W.

OTHER DATA SUMMARY: Corsair TX650W
DC Output (W)
21.4
41.5
64.3
89.4
150.0
199.3
250.2
301.8
403.9
510.7
651.0
Intake (°C)
22
22
22
24
27
32
32
32
34
38
46
Exhaust (°C)
28
28
30
33
37
47
51
52
54
59
72
Temp Rise (°C)
3
3
4
7
10
15
19
20
20
21
30
Fan Voltage (V)
3.78
3.78
3.78
3.78
3.78
3.85
3.91
4.83
8.81
11.1
11.2
SPL (dBA@1m)
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
23
38
43
44
Power Factor
0.93
0.99
0.98
0.99
0.99
0.99
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
AC Power in Standby: 0.5W / 0.124 PF
AC Power with No Load, PSU power On: 18.3W / 0.71 PF
NOTE: The ambient room temperature during testing can vary a few degrees from review to review. Please take this into account when comparing PSU test data.

ANALYSIS

1. EFFICIENCY This is a measure of AC-to-DC conversion efficiency. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide recommends 80% efficiency or better at all output power loads. 80% efficiency means that to deliver 80W DC output, a PSU draws 100W AC input, and 20W is lost as heat within the PSU. Higher efficiency is preferred for reduced energy consumption and cooler operation. The latter allows reduced cooling airflow, which translates to lower noise.

Even at the super low output load of just 21.4W, the efficiency of the TX650 was a reasonably high 62.9%. This is slightly better than the 61% of the VX450W and compares very favorably with the HX620W's 49.5% efficiency at the same power load. Nearly 82% efficiency was seen at 90W output; the benchmark 80% efficiency probably reached around 75W or 80W. The peak of ~84% was centered at about 300W, and >80% efficiency was maintained, just barely, to full rated 650W output.

2. VOLTAGE REGULATION refers to how stable the output voltages are under various load conditions. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide calls for the +12, +5V and +3.3V lines to be maintain within ±5%. At virtually all loads, all the voltages were just about dead on, within a minuscule -0.2V and +0.1V range on the 12V line. The voltage drop during the extreme crossloading test was just as good.

3. AC RIPPLE refers to unwanted "noise" artifacts in the DC output of a switching power supply. It's usually very high in frequency (in the order of kilohertz or megahertz). The peak-to-peak value is measured. The ATX12V Guide allows up to 120mV (peak-to-peak) of AC ripple on the +12V line and 50mV on the +5V and +3.3V lines. Ripple stayed very low, under 15mv on all lines, until about the 200W output level. Beyond this point, it increased in direct proportion to power putput, and reached a fairly high 94 mV on the 12V line at full load. This is still less than the maximum 120 mV ripple recommended by ATX12V. The higher than expected ripple may be related to our sample's thermal behavior.

4. POWER FACTOR is ideal when it measures 1.0. In the most practical sense, PF is a measure of how "difficult" it is for the electric utility to deliver the AC power into your power supply. High PF reduces the AC current draw, which reduces stress on the electric wiring in your home (and elsewhere up the line). It also means you can do with a smaller, cheaper UPS backup; they are priced according to their VA (volt-ampere) rating. PF on this sample was excellent thanks to the active power factor correction circuit, staying at or very close to the theoretical maximum of 1.0.

5. LOW LOAD TESTING revealed no problems starting at very low loads, with standby coming at a half watt, and no-load at 18.3W. Our sample had no issue starting up with no load at all.

6. LOW AND 240 VAC PERFORMANCE

The power supply was set to 500W load with 120VAC through the hefty variac in the lab. The variac was then dialed 10V lower every 10 minutes. This is to check the stability of the PSU under brownout conditions where the AC line voltage drops from the 110~120V norm. The TX650W is rated for operation 90~260VAC, a wider range than the usual 100~240VAC. Most power supplies achieve higher efficiency with higher AC input voltage. SPCR's lab is equipped with a 240VAC line, used to check power supply efficiency for the benefit of those who live in 240VAC mains regions.

Low VAC Test: Corsair TX650W @ 500W Output
VAC
AC Current
AC Power
Efficiency
242V
2.50A
601W
83.2%
120V
5.18A
622W
80.2%
110V
5.68A
627W
79.8%
100V
6.31A
630W
79.4%
90V
7.04A
634W
78.9%

The TX650W demonstrated no problems with the low voltage test. Neither voltage regulation nor ripple changed measurably during the test, and efficiency dropped only marginally. Efficiency improved with 240VAC input, around 3 percentage points at 500W; Corsair's claim of 86% peak efficiency with 240VAC input at ~50% load is perfectly believable.



Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next

Power - Article Index
Help support this site, buy the Corsair TX650W power supply from one of our affiliate retailers!