Viewing page 3 of 5 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
TESTING
For a fuller understanding of ATX power supplies, please read
the reference article Power
Supply Fundamentals. Those who seek source materials
can find Intel's various PSU design guides at Form
Factors.
For a complete rundown of testing equipment and procedures, please
refer to SPCR's
PSU Test Platform V4.1. The testing system is a close simulation of
a moderate airflow mid-tower PC optimized for low noise.
Acoustics measurements are now performed in our anechoic chamber with ambient level of 11 dBA or lower, with a PC-based spectrum analyzer comprised of SpectraPlus with ACO Pacific mic and M-Audio digital audio interfaces.
In the test rig, the ambient temperature of the PSU varies proportionately
with its output load, which is exactly the way it is in a real PC environment.
But there is the added benefit of a high power load tester which allows incremental
load testing all the way to full power for any non-industrial PC power supply.
Both fan noise and voltage are measured at various standard loads. It is, in
general, a very demanding test, as the operating ambient temperature of the
PSU often reaches >40°C at full power. This is impossible to achieve
with an open test bench setup.
The 120mm fan responsible for "case airflow" is deliberately
run at a steady low level (6~7V) when the system is run at "low"
loads. When the test loads become greater, the 120mm fan is turned up to a higher
speed, but one that doesn't affect the noise level of the overall system. Anyone
who is running a system that draws 400W or more would definitely want more than
20CFM of airflow through their case, and at this point, the noise level of the
exhaust fan is typically not the greatest concern.
Great effort has been made to devise as realistic
an operating environment for the PSU as possible, but the thermal and noise
results obtained here still cannot be considered absolute. There are too many
variables in PCs and too many possible combinations of components for any single
test environment to provide infallible results. And there is always the bugaboo
of sample variance. These results are akin to a resume, a few detailed photographs,
and some short sound bites of someone you've never met. You'll probably get
a pretty good overall representation, but it is not quite the same as an extended
meeting in person.
REAL SYSTEM POWER NEEDS: While we test the PSU to full
output in order to verify the manufacturer's claims, real desktop PCs simply
do not require anywhere near this level of power. The most pertinent range of
DC output power is between about 40W and 300W, because it is the power range
where most systems will be working most of the time. To illustrate this point,
we
conducted system tests to measure the power draw of several actual systems
under idle and worst-case conditions. Our most power-hungry overclocked
130W TDP processor rig with an ATI Radeon X1950XTX-512 graphics card drew ~256W
DC peak from the power supply under full load — well within the capabilities
of any modern power supply. Please follow the link provided above to see the
details. It is true that very elaborate systems with the most power hungry dual
video cards today might draw as much as another 150~200W, but the total should
remain under 500W in extrapolations of our real world measurements.
INTERPRETING TEMPERATURE DATA
It important to keep in mind that fan speed varies with temperature,
not output load. A power supply generates more heat as output increases, but
is not the only the only factor that affects fan speed. Ambient temperature
and case airflow have almost as much effect. Our test rig represents a challenging
thermal situation for a power supply: A large portion of the heat generated
inside the case must be exhausted through the power supply, which causes a corresponding
increase in fan speed.
When examining thermal data, the most important indicator of cooling
efficiency is the difference between intake and exhaust. Because
the heat generated in the PSU loader by the output of the PSU is always the
same for a given power level, the intake temperature should be roughly the same
between different tests. The only external variable is the ambient room temperature.
The temperature of the exhaust air from the PSU is affected by several factors:
- Intake temperature (determined by ambient temperature and power output
level)
- Efficiency of the PSU (how much heat it generates while producing the
required output)
- The effectiveness of the PSU's cooling system, which is comprised of:
- Overall mechanical and airflow design
- Size, shape and overall surface area of heatsinks
- Fan(s) and fan speed control circuit
The thermal rise in the power supply is really the
only indicator we have about all of the above. This is why the intake temperature
is important: It represents the ambient temperature around the power supply
itself. Subtracting the intake temperature from the exhaust temperature gives
a reasonable gauge of the effectiveness of the power supply's cooling system.
This is the only temperature number that is comparable between different reviews,
as it is unaffected by the ambient temperature.
TEST RESULTS
Note that the test data shows just one 12V line/load. Our PSU load tester has three separate 12V load circuits, and all three were used: One for the main ATX and drive power output cables, one for
the AUX12V connectors, and one for the PCIe 16X power connectors.
The ambient temperature was 22~24°, and the ambient noise level was 11
dBA.
|
OUTPUT, VOLTAGE REGULATION & EFFICIENCY: DA700
|
|
DC Output Voltage (V) + Current (A)
|
Total DC Output
|
AC Input
|
Calculated Efficiency
|
|
+12V1
|
+5V
|
+3.3V
|
-12V
|
+5VSB
|
|
12.16
|
0.94
|
5.13
|
0.99
|
3.40
|
0.97
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
21.5
|
42
|
51.2%
|
|
12.16
|
2.62
|
5.13
|
0.99
|
3.40
|
0.97
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
41.9
|
67
|
62.6%
|
|
12.16
|
3.56
|
5.11
|
1.96
|
3.40
|
1.86
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
64.2
|
92
|
69.8%
|
|
12.14
|
5.08
|
5.11
|
2.91
|
3.38
|
2.67
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
90.1
|
121
|
74.5%
|
|
12.10
|
8.49
|
5.01
|
4.55
|
3.37
|
5.44
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
149.6
|
191
|
78.3%
|
|
12.05
|
11.12
|
5.00
|
6.50
|
3.36
|
7.54
|
0.6
|
0.2
|
200.0
|
247
|
81.0%
|
|
12.00
|
13.90
|
5.00
|
9.00
|
3.34
|
8.48
|
0.8
|
0.3
|
251.2
|
310
|
81.0%
|
|
11.98
|
16.36
|
5.01
|
10.60
|
3.34
|
11.00
|
1.0
|
0.5
|
300.2
|
372
|
80.7%
|
|
11.93
|
21.71
|
4.95
|
13.60
|
3.32
|
14.89
|
1.5
|
0.8
|
397.8
|
494
|
80.5%
|
|
11.85
|
28.39
|
4.89
|
17.90
|
3.28
|
15.94
|
1.5
|
0.8
|
498.2
|
628
|
79.3%
|
|
11.80
|
43.90
|
4.84
|
19.50
|
3.25
|
19.60
|
1.5
|
0.8
|
700.1
|
921
|
76.0%
|
|
Crossload Test
|
|
11.89
|
43.90
|
5.00
|
0.99
|
3.3
|
0.97
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
525.1
|
654
|
80.3%
|
|
+12V Ripple (peak-to-peak): maximum of 39mV @ full power
+5V Ripple (peak-to-peak): maximum of 13mV @ full power
+3.3V Ripple (peak-to-peak): maximum of 12mV @ full power
|
|
NOTE: The current and voltage for -12V and
+5VSB lines is not measured but based on switch settings of the DBS-2100
PS Loader. It is a tiny portion of the total, and potential errors arising
from inaccuracies on these lines is <1W.
|
|
OTHER DATA SUMMARY: Silverstone DA700
|
| DC Output (W) |
21
|
42
|
64
|
90
|
150
|
200
|
251
|
300
|
398
|
498
|
700
|
| Intake (°C) |
21
|
21
|
24
|
26
|
30
|
33
|
34
|
35
|
36
|
38
|
47
|
| Exhaust (°C) |
25
|
25
|
27
|
29
|
34
|
37
|
39
|
40
|
42
|
46
|
63
|
| Temp Rise (°C) |
4
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
8
|
16
|
| Fan RPM* |
630
|
630
|
630
|
630
|
630
|
630
|
630
|
900
|
1200
|
1700
|
2300
|
| SPL - Live room |
22
|
22
|
22
|
22
|
22
|
22
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| SPL - Anechoic |
18
|
18
|
18
|
18
|
18
|
18
|
18
|
23
|
32
|
35
|
41
|
| Power Factor |
0.96
|
0.96
|
0.98
|
0.99
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
1.00
|
SPL: Sound Pressure Level measured in dBA at 1m
AC Power in Standby: 0.3W / 0.1 PF
AC Power with No Load, PSU power On: 13.8W / 0.77 PF
|
|
*Fan RPM: For whatever reason, the usual procedure of tapping into the positive lead of the fan and the common ground did not provide the voltage to the fan. So instead of fan voltage, both of our tachometers (laser and strobe) were used to periodically monitor fan speed. This was not continuous, but rather done whenever a change in the sound was noted or seen on the the sound level meter. It may not be as accurate as our usual voltage reading, which is monitored continuously.
NOTE: The ambient room temperature during
testing can vary a few degrees from review to review. Please take this
into account when comparing PSU test data.
|
ANALYSIS
1. EFFICIENCY This is a measure of AC-to-DC
conversion efficiency. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide recommends 80% efficiency
or better at all output power loads. 80% efficiency
means that to deliver 80W DC output, a PSU draws 100W AC input, and 20W is lost
as heat within the PSU. Higher efficiency is preferred for reduced energy consumption
and cooler operation. It allows reduced cooling airflow, which translates
to lower noise.
At the 20W load we first applied, efficiency was at only 51.2%.
This is to be expected; 20W load it's a harsh efficiency test for a PSU rated
at 700W. Efficiency rose fairly slowly as the load was increased. It was not
until past 150W load that 80% efficiency was exceed. Between 200W and 400W, a fairly flat
efficiency curve was seen, with a broad peak of 81%. This is maximum efficiency power range is probably ideal for a PSU rated at 700W; it's the typical power range of the majority of systems it will be used in. Efficiency dropped
to under 80% at 500W, and slipped to 76% at full load. By today's standards, efficiency is OK but not exceptional.
It's not unusual for PSU efficiency to droop at full load on our test bench, especially high power models such as this one. We subject PSUs to much high
temperature than most test procedures, which are usually conducted at typical
room temperature (under 25°C). At higher tempereature, efficiency almost always suffers; high temperature is what would have in a real computer that demanded 700W, and our test rig simulates that reality. This
sample might not pass the 80 Plus test... but then it might because the 80 Plus test is conducted at room temperature.
2. VOLTAGE REGULATION refers to how stable the output voltages
are under various load conditions. The ATX12V Power Supply Design Guide calls
for the +12, +5V and +3.3V lines to be maintain within ±5%. At all load
levels, voltages were much closer to the mark than required, and even at the
highest loads, the voltages sagged only slightly. This is very good
performance.
3. AC RIPPLE refers to unwanted "noise"
artifacts in the DC output of a switching power supply. It's usually very high
in frequency (in the order of 100s of kHz). The peak-to-peak value is measured.
The ATX12V Guide allows up to 120mV (peak-to-peak) of AC ripple on the +12V
line and 50mV on the +5V and +3.3V lines. Ripple on the DA700 was exceptionally low on all the lines at all loads.
4. POWER FACTOR is ideal when it measures 1.0. In the most
practical sense, PF is a measure of how "difficult" it is for the
electric utility to deliver the AC power into your power supply. High PF reduces
the AC current draw, which reduces stress on the electric wiring in your home
(and elsewhere up the line). It also means you can do with a smaller, cheaper
UPS backup; they are priced according to their VA (volt-ampere) rating. Power
factor was very good for this model, running no lower than 0.97 at any point
during testing.
5. LOW LOAD TESTING revealed no problems starting at very
low loads. Our sample had no issue starting up with no load, either. The 13.8W power draw seen with the unit running at no load suggests that there may be a dummy load which ensures consistent start even with very low load.
6. LOW & 240 VAC PERFORMANCE
The power supply was set to 500W load with 120VAC through the
hefty variac in the lab. The variac was then dialed 10V lower every 10 minutes.
This is to check the stability of the PSU under brownout conditions where the
AC line voltage drops from the 110~120V norm. DA700 is rated for
operation 115VAC ~ 240VAC ±10%. Most power supplies achieve higher efficiency
with higher AC input voltage. SPCR's lab is equipped with a 240VAC line, which
was used to check power supply efficiency for the benefit of those who live
in 240VAC mains regions.
|
Low VAC Test: DA700 @ 500W Output
|
|
VAC
|
AC Power
|
Efficiency
|
|
245V
|
610W
|
81.9%
|
|
120V
|
634W
|
78.6%
|
|
90V
|
660W
|
75.7%
|
Efficiency improved nearly 4% at our 245VAC input level. The DA700 passed the low voltage test without any issues. Neither voltage regulation nor ripple changed appreciably
during the test, and efficiency dropped by about 2% for every 8VAC input reduction.
7. TEMPERATURE & COOLING
Cooling was excellent, with the °C temperature
rise through the unit staying in single digits up past the 500W mark. The 16°C temperature
rise at full power is quite acceptable in our test rig.
| Help support this site, buy the SilverStone DA700 700W Power Supply from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|