Viewing page 4 of 6 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
TEST RESULTS
Our samples were tested according to our standard
hard drive testing methodology. The significant change in our testing procedure is that as of mid-2008, we're conducting most acoustics tests in our own anechoic chamber, which results in more accurate, lower SPL readings than before, especially as the SPL approaches 20 dBA and below, which is the territory of laptop drives. Our methodology focuses specifically on
noise, and great effort is taken to ensure it is comprehensively measured
and described. Performance is not tested comprehensively, for reasons discussed in detail in
the methodology article. In essence, between similar drives, we feel the performance differences are trivial, while the noise differences can be significant. Furthermore, many other hardware review sites (such as The Tech Report, Anandtech, and X-bit Labs) do a good job of covering the performance (speed) aspects of HDDs, while none of them do a thorough job of noise analysis.
A. ACOUSTICS
Two forms of hard drive noise are measured:
- Airborne acoustics
- Vibration-induced noise.
These two types of noise impact the subjective
perception of hard drive noise differently depending on how and where the drive
is mounted.
Both forms of noise are evaluated objectively and
subjectively. Airborne acoustics are measured in our anechoic chamber using a lab reference
caliber microphone and computer measurement system. Measurements are taken at a distance of one meter from the top
of the drive using an A-weighted filter. Vibration noise is rated on a scale
of 1-10 by comparing against our standard reference drives.
A final caveat: As with most reviews, our comments
are relevant to the samples we tested. Your sample may not be identical. There
are always some sample variances, and manufacturers also make changes without
telling everyone.
The WD drive was manufactured in February. Our Pipeline HD's date code
correlates to a July 2008 manufacture date, according to our secret Seagate
date-code decoder ring.
|
Ambient conditions at time of testing were 11 dBA and 20°C.
ACOUSTICS & POWER
|
DRIVE NOISE EVALUATION
|
|
Drive
Mfg date
firmware version
|
Vibration
1-10
(10 = no vibration)
|
Activity State
|
Airborne Acoustics
(dBA@1m)
|
Measured
Power
|
|
WD Caviar Green
2TB WD20EADS
February 2009
firmware 01.00A01
|
7
|
Idle
|
13
|
6.4 W (4.0W heads unloaded)
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
13
|
6.5 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
13~14
|
6.5 W
|
|
Seagate Pipeline HD
500GB ST3500321CS
July 2008
firmware SC14
|
6
|
Idle
|
14
|
4.8 W
|
|
Seek
|
15
|
6.9 W
|
|
REFERENCE DRIVES*
|
|
Seagate Pipeline HD Pro
1TB ST31000533CS
September 2008
firmware SC15
|
4
|
Idle
|
15
|
7.1 W
|
|
Seek
|
16
|
10.1 W
|
|
WD Caviar SE16
640GB WD6400AAKS
February 2008
firmware 01.03B01
|
7
|
Idle
|
16
|
6.8 W
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
16~17
|
8.1 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
18~19
|
9.3 W
|
|
Samsung F1
750GB HD753LJ
February 2008
firmware 1AA01109
|
6
|
Idle
|
16
|
6.9 W
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
18~19
|
8.9 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
20~21
|
10.2 W
|
|
Seagate 7200.11
1.5TB ST31500341AS
October 2008
firmware SD17
|
4
|
Idle
|
17
|
8.8 W
|
|
Seek
|
19
|
10.7 W
|
|
WD VelociRaptor WD3000GLFS
300GB, 10K RPM
15 May 2008
firmware 03.03V01
|
8
[w/o frame]
|
Idle
|
15
|
8.2 W
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
20
|
12.2 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
22
|
12.2 W
|
|
WD Caviar SE16
500GB WD5000KS
March 2006
firmware 07.02E07
|
4
|
Idle
|
19
|
8.5 W
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
19
|
8.6 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
22
|
10.7 W
|
|
WD Caviar Black
1TB WD1001FALS
July 2008
firmware 05.00K05
|
4
|
Idle
|
21
|
8.5 W
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
21
|
10.9 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
25
|
11.0 W
|
|
WD Raptor
150GB WD1500ADFD
March 2006
firmware 20.07P20
|
5
|
Idle
|
16
|
8.2 W
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
26~27
|
12.2 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
26~27
|
12.2 W
|
|
* These drives are references in the sense of previously
tested and known entireties to which newly tested products can be compared
and contrasted against.
|
Acoustically, these drives were the very quietest desktop models we've tested. The 2TB Green just edges out
the 500GB Pipeline, both in terms of airborne noise and vibration. The Caviar
Green's overall sound was broadband with very soft, low seeks that were only
audible within a proximity of one to two feet. Both idle and seek
with AAM enabled measured 13 dBA. Only when AAM was disabled did the seek noise
produce a measurable difference, though our ears weren't sharp enough to differentiate
the two modes.
The 500GB Pipeline had similar acoustic qualities, but with a touch more airborne noise
it sounded a bit louder and more hollow than the Caviar Green. The drive
measured 14 dBA idle and 15 dBA during seek. Seek was significantly more
noticeable a cacophony of pitter patters like fast-falling rain. It is
still very quiet for a desktop drive and easily disappears into the background
with distance and/or increased ambient noise.
|
Drive
Mfg date
firmware version
|
Vibration
1-10
(10 = no vibration)
|
Activity State
|
Airborne Acoustics
(dBA@1m)
|
Measured
Power
|
|
WD Caviar Green
2TB WD20EADS
February 2009
firmware 01.00A01
|
7
|
Idle
|
13
|
6.4 W (4.0W heads unloaded)
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
13
|
6.5 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
13~14
|
6.5 W
|
|
WD Caviar Green 1TB WD10EACS
February 2008
firmware 01.03B01
|
8
|
Idle
|
n/a*
|
5.7 W (3.7W heads unloaded)
|
|
Seek (AAM)
|
n/a*
|
6.7 W
|
|
Seek (Normal)
|
n/a*
|
7.5 W
|
|
Seagate Pipeline HD
500GB ST3500321CS
July 2008
firmware SC14
|
6
|
Idle
|
14
|
4.8 W
|
|
Seek
|
15
|
6.9 W
|
| *The WD Green Power 1TB was tested and measured, but before our anechoic chamber was built. The SPL numbers are higher, and not comparable. We believe it is as quiet as the 2TB model, but did not have access to one to test in the chamber. |
We derived some odd power consumption numbers with the WD drive. Idle and seek
measured almost exactly the same, though idle power dropped significantly after
the heads unload, which happens after approximately 7 seconds of inactivity
the same behavior that prompted WD to issue a firmware
upgrade to increase the delay to prevent excess head loading/unloading.
Our 2TB sample consumed less power during seek than our 1TB
sample, but the opposite was true when idle, whether the heads were
parked or not. The Seagate did very well, idling at only 4.8W.
| Help support this site, buy the WD Caviar Green 2TB Hard Drive from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|