Viewing page 6 of 7 pages.
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Test Results - Configuration #1 (IGP)
|
System Measurements (IGP)
|
|
State
|
Idle
|
Full CPU + GPU Load
|
|
Fan Speeds
|
6V
|
12V
|
6V
|
12V
|
|
AC Power
|
69W
|
71W
|
208W
|
205W
|
|
Noise Level
|
20 dBA
|
27 dBA
|
20 dBA
|
27 dBA
|
|
CPU Temp
|
31°C
|
28°C
|
56°C
|
49°C
|
|
SB Temp
|
37°C
|
35°C
|
45°C
|
40°C
|
|
HDD Temp
|
35°C
|
30°C
|
34°C
|
33°C
|
|
Ambient temperature: 24°C
CPU fan set at 70% with Speedfan (approximately 9V).
|
With all the system fans undervolted to 6V, the Fortress produced just 20 dBA.
The dominant source of noise was the hard drive, which added a distinct hiss
to the noise. The bulk of the additional noise was between 1 and 2 kHz, with
a spike around 1.7 kHz. Unlike some other cases tested with this drive, the
additional noise did not include much in the way of vibration resonance, proving
that for our single drive configuration at least the rubber mounting
grommets and plastic drive sleds were doing their job. It is also possible that
any resonance contributed by the hard drive was masked by the noise of the fans,
which occupied a very similar frequency band around 120 Hz.

The large spike between 1.0k and 2.0k all comes from the system drive.
Cooling was fine. The temperature of our 125W Phenom II the only major source of heat in
the system was well within safe limits. This confirms
that there was enough air going through the system to exhaust the heat being
thrown out by the CPU cooler. Above a certain minimum case airflow, CPU temperature is dictated
almost entirely by the choice of CPU cooler.
Test Results - Configuration #2 (HD 4870)
|
System Measurements (HD 4870)
|
|
State
|
Idle
|
Full CPU + GPU Load
|
|
System Fan Speeds
|
6V
|
|
Power Consumption
|
142W
|
357W
|
|
Noise Level
|
21~22 dBA
|
25~26 dBA
|
|
CPU Temp
|
32°C
|
54°C
|
|
SB Temp
|
45°C
|
60°C (!)
|
|
HDD Temp
|
35°C
|
36°C
|
|
GPU Temp
|
69°C
|
82°C
|
|
Ambient temperature: 24°C
CPU fan set at 70% with Speedfan (approximately 9V).
|
Adding power hungry the Radeon
HD 4870 into the mix barely affected the baseline noise at all, pushing
it up a barely noticeable 1~2 dBA at idle. The additional noise was broadband
and blended into the overall noise character quite well. Despite doubling the
power consumption at idle the temperatures did not change a lot and were quite
safe.
Loading the system pushed the noise up thanks to the thermally controlled fan
on the graphics card. At a peak of roughly 26 dBA, the noise was never quite
what we'd call noisy, but it was definitely above the threshold of inaudibility
that the system was flirting with before. CPU temperature did not change significantly,
and the GPU rose just 13°C over its idle temperature to a relatively cool
82°C.
Comparisons
|
Fortress FT01 vs. Recently Reviewed ATX Cases: Full Load
(IGP)
|
|
State
|
Silverstone Fortress FT01
|
Coolermaster Sileo 500
|
Antec P183
|
|
Fan Speed
|
6V (all fans)
|
12V (rear, front)
|
Low (rear)
|
|
Noise Level
|
20 dBA
|
20 dBA
|
19~20 dBA
|
|
CPU Temp
|
56°C
|
54°C
|
50°C
|
|
SB Temp
|
45°C
|
37°C
|
38°C
|
|
HD Temp
|
34°C
|
33°C
|
37°C
|
|
Ambient temperature: 22°C; CPU fan at 9V
* The Raven was tested with 2 ATI HD 4870 video cards.
|
The Coolermaster
Sileo 500 and the Antec P183 put the
Fortress in a bit of a bad light. CPU and especially motherboard temperatures
of the latter are quite a bit higher. It's
worth pointing out that the ambient temperature during testing was 2°C higher
for the Fortress, but this isn't enough to explain away the differences.
A more likely explanation is that the 20 dBA that we chose as a reference level
isn't truly representative of equal noise levels in the case, since we've seen
that, in the case of the Fortress, the noise level is dictated by the hard drive
(i.e. the system), not the fans in the case. It's quite possible that the fans
in the Fortress could be turned up to 7V or more without affecting the measured
noise level but significantly affecting the thermal performance. In any
case, the thermals are quite acceptable, and, except for serious overclockers,
very few people are likely to have a CPU produces more heat than our 125W block
heater Phenom II.
|
Fortress FT01 vs. Sileo 500 vs. P183: Full Load
(HD 4870)
|
|
State
|
Silverstone Fortress FT01
|
Coolermaster Sileo 500
|
Antec P183
|
|
Fan Speed
|
6V (all fans)
|
12V (rear, front)
|
Low (rear)
|
|
Noise Level
|
25~26 dBA
|
25 dBA
|
27~28 dBA
|
|
CPU Temp
|
54°C
|
56°C
|
51°C
|
|
SB Temp
|
60°C
|
53°C
|
62°C
|
|
GPU Temp
|
82°C
|
87°C
|
89°C
|
|
Ambient temperature: 22°C
CPU fan at 9V
*Antec P183 tested with a second HD 4870 idling in a lower slot
|
Comparing the same three cases with the HD 4870 installed tells quite a different
story. The Fortress did a significantly better job cooling the graphics card
than the other two cases in our comparison. At roughly the same noise level,
cooling was 5°C better than the Sileo 500. Versus the P183, the Fortress
was both cooler and quieter, though the comparison with the P183 is a bit stilted
since that case was tested with a second HD4870 installed (idling) below it.
A possible explanation is that the positive airflow setup touted by Silverstone
is doing its work and preventing any warm air from recirculating around the
graphics cards. This could also explain the higher CPU temperature we noticed
in the IGP test, since less air would be traveling around the CPU overall.
(Editor's Note: It would have been nice to compare the Silverstone Raven as well, but unfortunately, that case was only tested with an extreme gaming configuration with HD4870s in crossfire. I believe that the overall noise of the Raven could be a touch lower than any of the above cases while still keeping the components cooled at least in the same ballpark. )
| Help support this site, buy the SilverStone FT01B-W Black Mid Tower Case from one of our affiliate retailers! |
|