WD VelociRaptor: A Triple Crown

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
NeilBlanchard
Moderator
Posts: 7681
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
Contact:

Post by NeilBlanchard » Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:49 am

Hello,
dhanson865 wrote:Image
Is that the original Solo suspension cords? That have not broken -- yet?

jojo4u
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 7:00 am
Location: Germany

Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????

Post by jojo4u » Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:06 am

victorhortalives wrote:
Strid wrote: 1. OS drive - Mtron 16GB (but without the journaling/page/temp files on this). Ubuntu & WinXp
2. Local Data Drive - Raptor 74GB. Local stuff + OS journaling/temp directories.
WinXP on FAT32 or is there a way to offload the NTFS journal file?

victorhortalives
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Xhystos

Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????

Post by victorhortalives » Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:13 am

jojo4u wrote:
victorhortalives wrote:
Strid wrote: 1. OS drive - Mtron 16GB (but without the journaling/page/temp files on this). Ubuntu & WinXp
2. Local Data Drive - Raptor 74GB. Local stuff + OS journaling/temp directories.
WinXP on FAT32 or is there a way to offload the NTFS journal file?
I have no WinXP pagefile and all my WinXP Temp directories are on the RAM drive. Don't know about the XP journal file. There does seem to be some writes going on in XP that I can't move.

Let me know if I can move anything else.

I have no common drives between WinXp and Ubuntu. If I want to move anything I use the NAS as a temp store.

For Ubuntu, both /tmp and /var are on the Raptor. PLUS the / is ext2 formatted - has to be on the Mtron. /tmp also ext2 but /var is ext3.

jojo4u
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 7:00 am
Location: Germany

Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????

Post by jojo4u » Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:36 am

victorhortalives wrote: Don't know about the XP journal file. There does seem to be some writes going on in XP that I can't move.
Let me know if I can move anything else.
About the NTFS metafile frenzy fetch Sysinternal's Process Monitor, watch file access and delete all default filters. Lot's of acesses to $LOGFILE and $MFT and so if I remember correctly (on Linux currently).
About ext2 have a look at the noatime and nodiratime mount options.

victorhortalives
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 207
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Xhystos

Re: MIKE CHIN ARE YOU LISTENING ????

Post by victorhortalives » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:10 am

jojo4u wrote:
victorhortalives wrote: Don't know about the XP journal file. There does seem to be some writes going on in XP that I can't move.
Let me know if I can move anything else.
About the NTFS metafile frenzy fetch Sysinternal's Process Monitor, watch file access and delete all default filters. Lot's of acesses to $LOGFILE and $MFT and so if I remember correctly (on Linux currently).
About ext2 have a look at the noatime and nodiratime mount options.
Already have noatime - no need for nodiratime (subset of noatime).

Thanks for the info re Sysinternal's Process Monitor. WinXp is now no more than 10% of my use - mainly iTunes and the odd game.

Edwood
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: My Secret Laboratory

Post by Edwood » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:36 am

I hope the Bare Velociraptor fits the 2.5" Scythe enclosure with minimal modding. I'd then put the 2.5" Scythe into a 3.5" NoVibes. Heheh. Overkill, but why not?

I would like to know if the production Velociraptor will have some kind of "Void Warranty" sticker or something that would prevent one from removing the drive from the Icepack Noise Amplifier.

Because then I'd just wait for the OEM version to be available.

The Icepack is a completely boneheaded move on Western Digital's part.

christopher3393
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Bloomington, MN

Post by christopher3393 » Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:57 am

I haven't seen a retail box version of the velociraptor listed anywhere. My OEM from newegg does not have any void warranty sticker.

Strid
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:09 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Post by Strid » Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:20 am

Edwood wrote:The Icepack is a completely boneheaded move on Western Digital's part.
I disagree. While the actual cooling functionality can be questionable, it would be nearly impossible to market a 2.5" drive for desktop PC's that wouldn't fit into a standard drive bay.

lm
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:14 am
Location: Finland

Post by lm » Thu Jun 12, 2008 11:36 am

MikeC: Can you give us some insight into why on earth does removing the enclosure make it quieter, and how is the situation affected when comparing those 2 ways when they are actually mounted to a case in any of the common ways?

I just don't do warranty-killing mods anymore and would really like to understand this better.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Thu Jun 12, 2008 12:24 pm

lm wrote:MikeC: Can you give us some insight into why on earth does removing the enclosure make it quieter, and how is the situation affected when comparing those 2 ways when they are actually mounted to a case in any of the common ways?

I just don't do warranty-killing mods anymore and would really like to understand this better.
I haven't mounted the drive in a case, this is not normal tes procedure. But I can try it and report back.

The change in acoustics was explained briefly in the review. The close coupling of the HDD to the HS allows all the vibration to go into the HS -- literally, to "sink" into the aluminum frame. You may have noticed that vibration with the HDD in the frame is extremely low, the lowest we've ever seen. This is good in a way, but it also isn't good in another way -- the heatsink itself has lots of relatively unsupported parts: The ends of all the fins. Those ends are where the audible noise is coming from, AFAIK. I haven't experimented enough to know whether this is true. I can try sticking the whole HDD + frame into a NoVibes and see what the end result is... and maybe appiy pressure with the eraser end of a pencil on all the various parts to see which ones are actually making the resonating noise.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:19 pm

OK, after another 45 mins of playing the with stuff, I've concluded that the entire aluminum frame ends up resonating at all frequencies, and there's no easy way to stop it once it starts. Higher pitches noises are especially bad -- the whole range 1.5~10kHz gets full of tonal peajs you can easily hear. I'll post those up into the main article later along with a new MP3 file -- no time right now. Putting the who thing into a novibes barely did anything. It needs to be inside one of Scythe's rubber boxes, methinks.

But take it off the frame and it's as smooth and sweet as a baby's cheek.

zoob
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 380
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Post by zoob » Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:15 pm

What about filling the fins in with some silicone caulking (in the event that there is a warranty sticker attached to the IcePack?

christopher3393
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 9:46 pm
Location: Bloomington, MN

Post by christopher3393 » Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:17 pm

No warranty sticker on mine. :)

Edwood
Posts: 460
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 4:48 pm
Location: My Secret Laboratory

Post by Edwood » Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:48 pm

MikeC wrote: Putting the who thing into a novibes barely did anything. It needs to be inside one of Scythe's rubber boxes, methinks.

But take it off the frame and it's as smooth and sweet as a baby's cheek.
That is good news for me since the 2.5" NoVibes is nearly impossible to find for sale in the USA.

Hoping it fits in the 2.5" Scythe Box. Then put the Scythe Box in the 3.5" NoVibes III. :)

lm
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:14 am
Location: Finland

Post by lm » Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:33 pm

MikeC wrote:the heatsink itself has lots of relatively unsupported parts: The ends of all the fins. Those ends are where the audible noise is coming from, AFAIK. I haven't experimented enough to know whether this is true. I can try sticking the whole HDD + frame into a NoVibes and see what the end result is... and maybe appiy pressure with the eraser end of a pencil on all the various parts to see which ones are actually making the resonating noise.
So do I understand this correctly now: the heatsink is just badly designed and flimsy, resonating just at those frequencies that the drive generates the most? But wouldn't a regular computer case be much much worse yet for those resonations?

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Thu Jun 12, 2008 7:21 pm

lm wrote:So do I understand this correctly now: the heatsink is just badly designed and flimsy, resonating just at those frequencies that the drive generates the most? But wouldn't a regular computer case be much much worse yet for those resonations?
It's not flimsy at all. It weighs 320g, more than the drive itself. But it does resonate.

Here's a screen capture of the freq spectrum w/ the drive in the frame:

Image

Note the peaks centered at 700Hz, 1.5~2.2kHz, and 7kHz. These are all audible from a meter away.

Now here's the freq spectrum w/ the drive by itself:

Image

Note all the reductions in the range 1.5~8kHz.

You can also hear this difference here in one MP3 recording -- 10 seconds with frame, 10 seconds without.

All this is now on page 3 of the article.

To repeat -- I could not subdue the additional noise of the frame with a NoVibes, or even with my two hands holding the drive+frame. (well mostly it was still there... just changed.)

Tamas
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 11:53 pm
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Post by Tamas » Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:41 pm

KnightRT wrote:No doubt an impressive drive, but I'm having trouble getting worked up about hard disks when I see reviews for SSDs with sustained 120 MB/s transfer rates and essentially zero latency. They're expensive, and they have issues with small random writes, but these problems are rapidly disappearing. I'd be very surprised to see a new version of the Raptor after this one.

Relative to my 74 GB Raptor, the extra capacity means little to me. I have Windows and programs on that drive, segregated from the rest of my data that lives on a RAID array. A full install of XP and all the programs I've ever used takes about 15 GB; as an OS drive, the new Raptor is far beyond my needs. And as a data drive, it's too small. The only advantage is in latency, and I'd wager that the people who truly care about that use 15K SAS drives or SSDs. For lack of a compelling reason to buy this drive, I don't see the point.
In my opininon these SSD drives are coming very fast. Maybe next year the price will decrease to that level, when you consider buying a 16/32GB very fast SSD with 150MB/sec read/write, 0,1ms access time as system drive.
An example configuration:
-16GB Mtron 2.5" SSD (now approx 300$)
-Storage hard disk like a 1TB Green Power (now approx 160-180$)

16/32GB SSD-s are enough for system drive in most cases so the only question is the price drop pattern of these drives next year.

miahallen
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:31 pm
Location: Japan

Re: Xhystos

Post by miahallen » Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:16 pm

Aris wrote:
victorhortalives wrote:
MikeC wrote:<offtopic> victorhortalives -- So where's Xhystos? Is it related to Victor Horta?
Schuiten & Peeters : Cities of the Obscure

http://www.urbicande.be/intro/default.php?page=8&lg=en
http://www.urbicande.be/carte.php#
http://dictionary.ebbs.net/english/epages/edict_xyz.htm
For all those wondering, but too lazy too click links. Its a belgium comic book series created by Schuiten & Peeters.
Thanks!

miahallen
Posts: 305
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 10:31 pm
Location: Japan

Still cannot justify it

Post by miahallen » Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:30 pm

I really wanted one of these drives, but when the time came to put my money where my mouth was, I picked up one of the new WD 640AAKS drives.

Is it really worth the money?

lm
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:14 am
Location: Finland

Post by lm » Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:05 am

Mike: Thanks for the clarification. So to make it silent, I have to take it out of the frame and soft mount it? I mean, if the thing touches any metal even without the frame, it would be really bad right?

Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it.

One other thing I don't understand:

How come the average latency can be so much worse? Isn't it supposed to be a linear function of the spindle speed?

Seek time tells you how long it takes for the drive head to move to the correct position, and then the latency tells how long it takes for the spindle to spin to the correct position afaik.

For every 10krpm drive it should therefore be 3ms average (half rotatation), 6ms max (full rotation)?

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:06 am

lm wrote:Mike: Thanks for the clarification. So to make it silent, I have to take it out of the frame and soft mount it? I mean, if the thing touches any metal even without the frame, it would be really bad right?

Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it.

One other thing I don't understand:

How come the average latency can be so much worse? Isn't it supposed to be a linear function of the spindle speed?

Seek time tells you how long it takes for the drive head to move to the correct position, and then the latency tells how long it takes for the spindle to spin to the correct position afaik.

For every 10krpm drive it should therefore be 3ms average (half rotatation), 6ms max (full rotation)?
regarding latency: I'm simply citing what's on WD's website. Their press briefing only highlights the improved seek times, doesn't mention latency. All the other specs appear to be substantially improved.

I have been talking with WD, and forwarded all the info in that last post about the noise w/ and w/o the frame. The rep expressed great surprise, and the info has been forward to their engineers. We'll see if anything comes of it.

As for how best to use the WD -- that's certainly the way I'd use it, but you may be perfectly fine w/ it in the frame. Not everyone hears the same way...
Last edited by MikeC on Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

lm
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1251
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 6:14 am
Location: Finland

Post by lm » Fri Jun 13, 2008 6:18 am

Went and bought a Velociraptor just now. This review certainly made the sale for me.

dhanson865
Posts: 2198
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
Location: TN, USA

Post by dhanson865 » Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:32 am

NeilBlanchard wrote:Hello,

P150_review/notebookhdd.jpg

Is that the original Solo suspension cords? That have not broken -- yet?
That picture is from http://www.silentpcreview.com/article272-page4.html Submitted by Mike Chin on Tue, 2005-10-11 so I don't think they'll ever break as they are frozen in time by the camera :D

I'm surprised you didn't notice the SPCR watermark on the image.

kittle
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:44 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by kittle » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:26 pm

ok.. oddball question here.

What is the seek noise like on this thing?

It sounds like you can get rid of the whine by removnig it from the heatsink -- which is good.

But when/if I get one i want to mount it in such a way that I HEAR the seek noises but no annoying whine.

IsaacKuo
Posts: 1705
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 7:50 am
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Post by IsaacKuo » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:34 pm

kittle wrote:But when/if I get one i want to mount it in such a way that I HEAR the seek noises but no annoying whine.
You can hook up the motherboard's hard drive light header to the PC Speaker, if you want.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:46 pm

If AAM is kept off, the seek noise is audible even when suspended -- if your ambient is low enough and the PC is close enough. This is true of 99% of 3.5" drives... tho a few may be slightly better than the VR.

ryboto
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: New Hampshire, US
Contact:

Post by ryboto » Sun Jun 15, 2008 7:32 am

Mike,
Great review. I've always wanted to go 2.5'' to save space, especially now since I'm using an NSK1300, but I've been tentative to give up the quickness of a raptor drive. The new VR's sound great, but I'd rather not spend so much. Did WD give you any indication of a release date for the 150GB version of the VR? There's a PDF on their website that includes a 150GB VR model in their product lineup, but no indication of price/availability.

psyopper
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:15 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post by psyopper » Sun Jun 15, 2008 8:23 am

What I find interesting about the two attached charts (SPL with and without the heatsink) is the mass dampening effect.

As was pointed out, the high frequency (700+ Hz) dropped by removing the mass, while the low frequency (300- Hz) went up with the removal of the same mass. It's probably easier to hide the low frequency noise so it makes more sense, but as a pure exercise in showing real world mass dampening effects it's an interesting tool.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Sun Jun 15, 2008 9:24 am

psyopper wrote:What I find interesting about the two attached charts (SPL with and without the heatsink) is the mass dampening effect.

As was pointed out, the high frequency (700+ Hz) dropped by removing the mass, while the low frequency (300- Hz) went up with the removal of the same mass. It's probably easier to hide the low frequency noise so it makes more sense, but as a pure exercise in showing real world mass dampening effects it's an interesting tool.
It's more revealing if you watch the freq. spectrum live. There's less boost in the lower freq range than those snapshot images indicate. Remember they are moments frozen in time. The next moment will not show exactly the same graph because HDD noise is not constant. Try running the MP3 file on a software that lets you analyze it -- actually a 30-day trial copy of SpectraPlus would work nicely -- and you'll get more insight into it all. Also, just listening to the sound file, you can't hear much difference in the low end, but you sure can hear the effect on the mids and highs. That's the way it is live, too, as I hear it.

BeerParty
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 10:49 am
Location: Nashua, NH - USA

Quiter 20,000 RPM raptor?

Post by BeerParty » Mon Jun 16, 2008 9:25 am

MikeC wrote:
lm wrote:Mike: Thanks for the clarification. So to make it silent, I have to take it out of the frame and soft mount it? I mean, if the thing touches any metal even without the frame, it would be really bad right?

Are you talking back to WD about this issue? Maybe they fix it...
I have been talking with WD, and forwarded all the info in that last post about the noise w/ and w/o the frame. The rep expressed great surprise, and the info has been forward to their engineers. We'll see if anything comes of it.
Mike - well someone in WD was listening, according to this article about WD's work on a 20,000 RPM raptor:
However, our sources said that the drive will be ‘silent’ – that’s the last thing I would have expected from a drive with platters spinning at 20,000 RPM. Western Digital is apparently working on silencing the beast by improving the housing technology, which will now not just act as a heatsink, but also as a noise cancelling device. We’d also hope that the drive enclosure has some vibration dampening technology as well, because that’s also likely to be a problem given the high spindle speeds.

Post Reply