Zotac GeForce 9300-ITX WiFi: Good Things Come in Small Packa
Posted: Thu May 14, 2009 7:58 am
Discussions about Silent Computing
https://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/
https://www.silentpcreview.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=53738
Lovely, just lovely! Excellent review!MikeC wrote:http://www.silentpcreview.com/zotac-gf9300itx
There are virtually no other great mini-ITX solutions for LGA775, let alone one with onboard Nvidia graphics!LodeHacker wrote:Lovely, just lovely! Excellent review!MikeC wrote:http://www.silentpcreview.com/zotac-gf9300itx
Say Mike is there any better Mini-ITX solution than this one basing on Intel / NVIDIA? (Better meaning more bang for my buck )
The selection of Intel/Mini-ITX boards is scant whether they be based on nVidia or Intel chipsets. Check out what Newegg has to offer.LodeHacker wrote: Say Mike is there any better Mini-ITX solution than this one basing on Intel / NVIDIA? (Better meaning more bang for my buck )
High-end/gaming as it supports 95W quad cores and a full sized PCI-E slot. It's also suited for a HTPC, but kinda overkill.Meato wrote:What is the target market for this product? Or maybe applications is a better term.
I would argue that it's not TOO overkill. If you use the onboard video, put a TV tuner in the PCIe slot, and use a Core 2 Duo of some sort, you've got yourself a fairly efficient, very small, and very fast HTPC, with WiFi included. And for Mini-ITX, it's not too expensive, either, given the performance.Lawrence Lee wrote: High-end/gaming as it supports 95W quad cores and a full sized PCI-E slot. It's also suited for a HTPC, but kinda overkill.
Yes. This has been well documented in the past. With a high efficiency AC/DC adapter, you might see AC power draw dropping by as much as 5W, maybe even a bit more. In our reviews, we're generally more concerned about comparability rather than absolutely lowest power -- ie, comparing this board to others in the past -- which is why we've been using the same PSU for most mobo reviews for quite a while. Not only the same model but the same exact PSU. We figure changes in this unit due to wear and tear are minimal -- the thing is only on for a few hours for each mobo test but otherwise sitting idle.Worker control wrote:I'm curious if power usage is lower with a picopsu / 12V brick combo. That's the setup that I'd expect many people to use with this, and 35W is a lot lower than 400W.
If you really want to grab the low voltage/low heat brass ring, use a USB tuner- that's where I'm headed with my next HTPC build. (The Hauppage 1600 card is easily the hottest thing in my current HTPC, including the CPU)shleepy wrote: If you use the onboard video, put a TV tuner in the PCIe slot
x2LodeHacker wrote:Excellent review!
Big advantage of Atom/Ion is that you can easily get buy a tiny CPU heatsink. If having the absolutely smallest formfactor is your goal, this or some sort of MoDT solution is your best bet.Meato wrote: I recently read the review of Zotac's Ion board(s) and am confused as to where these boards are most at home. In what circumstances do the differing products excel?
A Shuriken fits in the SG05 without even taking out the standard PSU, and I think the XP-90 might, as well. The other limiting factor in that particular case would be on the side of the HDD bracket, since the heatsink would most likely reach that side, as well.b3nbranch wrote:I agree ... great article on this mini-ITX compared to the others
I've found.
I'm thinking that in a larger mini-ITX case (Sugo SG05?) with a
picoPSU (no power supply inside the case) you could possibly put one of
several substantial heat sinks in there. In another thread, a poster put
this board in a shorter mini-ITX case and, by using a picoPSU, fit a
Thermalright XP-90 in there. (He had to cut a little bit off the
heatsink base to avoid interference with those nearby capacitors).
Considering USB 1.1/2.0 only supplies 2.5W per port, I'd like to see that.This is even more frugal when you consider that we've seen USB 802.11g adapters burning up 10~15W.
You missed it. Bottom of page five. The absolute maximum it can pull is 5W anyway.matt_garman wrote:Maybe I missed it, but what was the state of the WiFi when you took the idle power reading? Just wondering how many watts the wireless circuit needs.
Actually, USB devices can request more power from the motherboard, if the motherboard is willing to dish more. This is how most cell phone USB chargers work. (otherwise, yes, you're correct, 5W maximum)Monkeh16 wrote:You missed it. Bottom of page five. The absolute maximum it can pull is 5W anyway.matt_garman wrote:Maybe I missed it, but what was the state of the WiFi when you took the idle power reading? Just wondering how many watts the wireless circuit needs.
And still, they can only pull 7.5W from a single port, and most host controllers don't support that. Any wireless card which pulls 15W is either very, very poorly designed, or is putting out so much power it's breaking every law on radiated emissions I know of. And would need a hell of a heatsink. And would still require two ports.LiquidRain wrote:Actually, USB devices can request more power from the motherboard, if the motherboard is willing to dish more. This is how most cell phone USB chargers work. (otherwise, yes, you're correct, 5W maximum)Monkeh16 wrote:You missed it. Bottom of page five. The absolute maximum it can pull is 5W anyway.matt_garman wrote:Maybe I missed it, but what was the state of the WiFi when you took the idle power reading? Just wondering how many watts the wireless circuit needs.
A geminii fits in the SG05, that's no the s type, though that also fits. The geminii can passively cool a quad core with just the psu fan taking the hot air out.shleepy wrote:A Shuriken fits in the SG05 without even taking out the standard PSU, and I think the XP-90 might, as well. The other limiting factor in that particular case would be on the side of the HDD bracket, since the heatsink would most likely reach that side, as well.b3nbranch wrote:I agree ... great article on this mini-ITX compared to the others
I've found.
I'm thinking that in a larger mini-ITX case (Sugo SG05?) with a
picoPSU (no power supply inside the case) you could possibly put one of
several substantial heat sinks in there. In another thread, a poster put
this board in a shorter mini-ITX case and, by using a picoPSU, fit a
Thermalright XP-90 in there. (He had to cut a little bit off the
heatsink base to avoid interference with those nearby capacitors).
SuperMicro has announced a couple of Atom based (w/PCIe 8x slots) server boards recently, one of them with 2 ethernet ports. No word on availability however. I'm drooling at the prospect of sticking a 4x SAS cage & LP RAID card into a small box some time soon.qdemn7 wrote:Zotac is definitely making some nice Mini-ITX boards. If this board had two gigabit ethernet ports it would be perfect for making an Untangle box. As it is, you still have to spend money for a PCI Express to gigabit NIC.
But you don't need Ion for your normal TV. Even Atom alone, with no video acceleration, can handle standard def video. Search around and you will find existing Atom boards with s-video out.Ant6n wrote:ironically, i would've liked to see a tv-out. there are some out there still trying to run an htpc or small file server on a 'normal' tv.