It is currently Thu Dec 25, 2014 3:55 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Intel DG41MJ: Affordable 775 Mini-ITX
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 3:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Posts: 12050
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Intel DG41MJ: Affordable 775 Mini-ITX

_________________
Mike Chin, SPCR Editor/Publisher
Support SPCR by buying your gear through these links: NCIX, Amazon and Newegg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 8:52 pm
Posts: 532
...


Last edited by croddie on Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 5:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:11 am
Posts: 540
Location: Massachusetts, USA
I agree.

Plus..wtf is with not putting a cheap aluminum heat sink on the SB chip? seems silly if you ask me...I guess they deemed it not nessisary, and saving a dollar times thousands of boards = thousands of dollars. but still..its begging for a heat sink!

_________________
The Rig: Asus P5Q, e8400 O.C.'d to 3.6 Ghz w/ Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro, MSI GTX460 768MB, 4x1gb G.Skill@1066Mhz, 320gb WD & 500gb Samsung suspended, Corsair 520W PSU, Windows 7 Professional x64


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:10 pm
Posts: 1008
Location: San Jose, California
You didn't sat in the beginning that the board used the G41 chipset before you started talking about the differences with the G45. It is not entirely clear the board uses the G41 until later in the article.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
Posts: 1406
Location: USA
RoGuE wrote:
I agree.

Plus..wtf is with not putting a cheap aluminum heat sink on the SB chip? seems silly if you ask me...I guess they deemed it not nessisary, and saving a dollar times thousands of boards = thousands of dollars. but still..its begging for a heat sink!

No, you really don't need a heatsink for that ICH7 chip. I've never seen a board with a heatsink on it -- usually see it as part of the 945G chipset.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
Posts: 1406
Location: USA
croddie wrote:
which is moot because lack of digital video output rules out for uses requiring displays

What do you mean? It has DVI (which means it will also support HDMI via an adaptor).

croddie wrote:
and high power consumption rules out for basic home servers.

High? 35W using a non-optimal PSU hardly seems high. Is it the best possible, no, but we are talking only about a 5W difference. Still for a file server, one of the 945G based Atom board would be better just because of base price. Any energy savings would just be icing on the cake.

I think the point of this board is for people who want to make very simple, tiny, general purpose computer. They need a little bit more horsepower than an Atom, but nothing else. The normal case wouldn't be to pair this with an E7200, but with a Celeron. This is the first affordable offering for this application in this form factor. The question is how big a market is this?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 8:52 pm
Posts: 532
jessekopelman wrote:
croddie wrote:
which is moot because lack of digital video output rules out for uses requiring displays

What do you mean? It has DVI (which means it will also support HDMI via an adaptor).

OK didn't look at the picture, just the conclusion which said "Lack of digital A/V outputs". Maybe Lawrence Lee can correct that. In that case it might be fine for an office system.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 13, 2009 6:22 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1042
Location: Vancouver
croddie wrote:
OK didn't look at the picture, just the conclusion which said "Lack of digital A/V outputs". Maybe Lawrence Lee can correct that. In that case it might be fine for an office system.


Sorry about that. Fixed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Olaf van der Spek and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group