Corsair Gold AX850 PSU
Good review, thank you !
On page 4 : the * on the "Enermax Modu82+" line in the comparaison chart should either be removed (confusion with the other * in the chart) or replaced by another symbol to explain the complaints about noisier than expected fan in the Enermax (I believe that's what the * is for).
On page 4 : the * on the "Enermax Modu82+" line in the comparaison chart should either be removed (confusion with the other * in the chart) or replaced by another symbol to explain the complaints about noisier than expected fan in the Enermax (I believe that's what the * is for).
It might be boring, but it certainly gives us proof that unlike the latest Corsair HX psus, these Seasonic X-Series based corsair models are truly quiet like their pedigree was. I'm glad to see this and the X-series are definitely top recommendations for basically any high power system. :pkater wrote:Another boring review of another boringly great PSU *
Is it too much to want a PSU like this in < 500W range and at < $ 100?
* smiley is here for joyless haters who need it to properly read the post...
Also your want for a lower end power supply with similar characteristics might be satisfied by a Seasonic X-560. Hopefully that'll get close to the $100 mark. It will probably be my pick for a quiet mid-power psu.
Also I think the next psus of interest are the HCP and HCG made by Delta, very curious how quiet these guys will be.
-
- Posts: 5275
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: ITALY
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Probably. The impact of internal heat on efficiency is always more significant as you go up in power load. I don't see this as a serious failing on the part of the manufacturer -- it's really a serious flaw in the 80 Plus test procedure, which ignores operating/environmental temperature. I've reapeated myself on this point for so long and so many times (including directly to 80 Plus) that I hardly bother any more.quest_for_silence wrote:
I guess this sample also miss to reach 87% (and by far) at full load (exactly as the previously tested Cougar GX-700), while "real" Seasonics does (and Enermax almost too). May it be typical of Gold units above 650W?
Regards,
Luca
FWIW, the Corsair AX850 reached 89.2% efficiency at 700W out of the hotbox. This was the highest load I tested it with outside the hotbox, so it seems safe to say the unit would have made 87% at full power in "23°C ± 5°C" -- ie, max temp 28C. (Ditto 90% at half power at the same temp range instead of the 43~45C in my test.)
-
- Posts: 5275
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: ITALY
MikeC wrote:-- it's really a serious flaw in the 80 Plus test procedure, which ignores operating/environmental temperature .
Apropos of methodology: what do you think, if any, about Oklahoma Wolf's own method?
Sometimes he's got substantially different numbers at full load: see M12D-850 reviews for a quick comparison, on SPCR it's clearly missed the Silver requirement, while on Jonnyguru it's easily got it, even in its own hot box at 43°C.
However things go different with the AX-850: at JonnyGuru it slightly misses Gold level at any testing point (sample variance?), but even not so definitely as in SPCR findings.
Regards,
Luca
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Impossible to say what the causes of those differences are. Different loader; his is probably more accurate, as mine is more or less DIY. But it looks like my box gets a little hotter. No surprises there -- the exhaust is just one Nexus 120.quest_for_silence wrote:MikeC wrote:-- it's really a serious flaw in the 80 Plus test procedure, which ignores operating/environmental temperature .
Apropos of methodology: what do you think, if any, about Oklahoma Wolf's own method?
Sometimes he's got substantially different numbers at full load: see M12D-850 reviews for a quick comparison, on SPCR it's clearly missed the Silver requirement, while on Jonnyguru it's easily got it, even in its own hot box at 43°C.
However things go different with the AX-850: at JonnyGuru it slightly misses Gold level at any testing point (sample variance?), but even not so definitely as in SPCR findings.
Regards,
Luca
Re: Corsair Gold AX850 PSU
So the fan doesn't spin at lower loads/temperatures because the voltage going into it isn't high enough to start it spinning... Isn't the power going into the fan at this point just being wasted? Wouldn't it be more sensible to have the fan power completely switch off when it isn't needed?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 12285
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Corsair Gold AX850 PSU
Probably around 0.1W. It's not the most efficient way but it works because the fan has such low start speed & good bearings. PWM makes it work more the way you suggest but it's more costly, afaik -- which might be why it's not used in the Corsairs while it is used in the Seasonic X series.Moo wrote:So the fan doesn't spin at lower loads/temperatures because the voltage going into it isn't high enough to start it spinning... Isn't the power going into the fan at this point just being wasted? Wouldn't it be more sensible to have the fan power completely switch off when it isn't needed?
Re: Corsair Gold AX850 PSU
PWM was used in the "old" X series X-650 and X-750. The "new" X-series such as the Seasonic X-560 use the same two wire non-PWM fan arrangement as the Corsair. So I guess this is another of those differences of detail between the older and newer generation of Seasonic X devices.