It is currently Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:35 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:48 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1115
Location: Vancouver
http://www.silentpcreview.com/Intel_Core_i7-6700/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 12:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 5:44 pm
Posts: 3
Thanks for the review.

Quote:
While the Core i7-6700's specified TDP is 71% that of the i7-6700K, our sample failed to deliver substantial power savings. The vanilla model is undoubtedly more efficient but not by a significant margin. If you're leaning toward the non-K variant because of its seemingly lower power requirements, perhaps for a small/quiet build, the difference is too minor to weigh into the decision. The same can be said if you're considering the "K" version for its higher clock speeds; the level of performance increase is slight. The "K" model is also less formidable than in years past as Intel now allows users to overclock without adjusting the CPU multiplier. For Skylake, the base clock frequency (BCLK) can be increased independently without affecting other subsystems (PCI-E, SATA) like in the good old days of the Pentium 4 and Core 2 series.
Was this tested? It's my understanding that substantial BCLK adjustments are unavailable for Skylake non-K CPUs. I read about it second/thirdhand around or before release time (see below) but never followed up on it.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1571642/inte ... t_24357704
http://www.overclock.net/t/1570313/skyl ... t_24362348


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 12:18 am 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1115
Location: Vancouver
twig wrote:
Thanks for the review.

Quote:
While the Core i7-6700's specified TDP is 71% that of the i7-6700K, our sample failed to deliver substantial power savings. The vanilla model is undoubtedly more efficient but not by a significant margin. If you're leaning toward the non-K variant because of its seemingly lower power requirements, perhaps for a small/quiet build, the difference is too minor to weigh into the decision. The same can be said if you're considering the "K" version for its higher clock speeds; the level of performance increase is slight. The "K" model is also less formidable than in years past as Intel now allows users to overclock without adjusting the CPU multiplier. For Skylake, the base clock frequency (BCLK) can be increased independently without affecting other subsystems (PCI-E, SATA) like in the good old days of the Pentium 4 and Core 2 series.
Was this tested? It's my understanding that substantial BCLK adjustments are unavailable for Skylake non-K CPUs. I read about it second/thirdhand around or before release time (see below) but never followed up on it.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1571642/inte ... t_24357704
http://www.overclock.net/t/1570313/skyl ... t_24362348


This was my understanding.. I couldn't find any info that contradicted it. I will test it out tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 11:12 am 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1115
Location: Vancouver
Yup, I was mistaken. Can't get past 102 MHz. The review has been corrected.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 5:44 pm
Posts: 3
Cool, thanks for the update and confirmation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 10:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:25 pm
Posts: 30
Location: Canada
Nice review! I'm currently running a passively-cooled i7-4770S. At a glance, it looks like the i7-6700, despite the same 65W TDP, would be generating more heat. I guess I will just have to try and see. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2015 1:01 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 6225
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Juventas wrote:
Nice review! I'm currently running a passively-cooled i7-4770S. At a glance, it looks like the i7-6700, despite the same 65W TDP, would be generating more heat. I guess I will just have to try and see. :)


Probably not. While the i7-4770S has lower base/turbo speeds of 3.1GHz/3.9Ghz and the i7-6700 is 3.4GHz/4.0GHz, Skylake is a more efficient platform. Look at the idle power in the review: 23W for Skylake and 30W for Haswell. Light IGP loads are also less for the newer platform. Heavy IGP loads may be higher on Skylake than your Haswell CPU, but that's because there's a lot more EUs/IGP horsepower on the newer platform. I bet for heavy CPU loads, it'll be similar power use between the two SKUs.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

Support SPCR through these links: NCIX, Amazon and Newegg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:05 pm
Posts: 762
Location: Colorado, USA
With steady price decreases to CPU ($295), motherboards, and DDR4 memory, the i7-6700 is the best value in i7s now without a doubt.

The only real question is if the price premium for i7 is worth paying over say the i5-6600k which is about $75 cheaper as of right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intel Core i7-6700: Skylake i7 at 65W
PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:09 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 6225
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
djkest wrote:
The only real question is if the price premium for i7 is worth paying over say the i5-6600k which is about $75 cheaper as of right now.

It really comes down to use cases. Gaming = no. HTPC = no. Lots of video editing/transcoding, 3D modeling, rendering, etc = yes.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, Crucial MX100 256GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)

Support SPCR through these links: NCIX, Amazon and Newegg


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group