File server needs silencing

Show off your quiet rig.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
Akustyk
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:49 pm

File server needs silencing

Post by Akustyk » Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:18 pm

I just finished building a file server for a close friend who is an engineer and needs data backup and remote access. Many of my design decisions were determined by the user's needs, so please, keep in mind that I didn't have the liberty to make a fully personalized build.

I feel like I haven't done enough to silence the build. At idle, it is OK, but at > 50% load the CPU fan causes a lot of noise. What would you recommend that I do to make the build more quiet?

Details:
For the purposes of this build, I chose the Fractal Design Define Mini case. Fractal Design is known for making computer enclosures of superb quality and for paying special attention to the needs of quiet computing. The Mini is no exception. Also, it comes with six 3.5-inch, easily accessible hard drive bays, which is unique for a case of this size. Speaking of size, it is a small mATX case, so you will only be able to fit a micro-ATX motherboard. It is, obviously, no problem for a file server since the only expansion slot will need is a PCI-e slot for the RAID controller. Finally, the case is gorgeous! It has a fine, understated look that won't disturb even the classiest of laboratories or offices.
Image

Motherboard

I was limited to mATX motherboards, but it is hardly a limitation since there are many quality motherboards available in this form factor. I decided to go with a six-core AMD CPU and the Gigabyte 78LMT-S2P motherboard (free w/ purchase of CPU). The motherboard has built-in Ethernet (Gigabit), audio, and video capability, and the total of six SATA II ports. The six SATA 3 GB/s ports are important for those who do not plan to use a dedicated RAID controller and will, therefore, need to connect the hard drives to those SATA II inputs. Having six of them means you will be able to connect one DVD drive (for installing the operating system) and five hard drives. Finally, there is one special capability that only some motherboards have, name Wake on LAN (WOL). Wake on LAN is extremely useful if you want to be able to start the server up remotely, from another networked machine. Say, you are traveling overseas and your sever is off. You can use any computer with Internet access to send a little data packet to your server and wake it up. Handy, isn't it?

CPU

Out of the vast array of AMD CPUs I chose a six-core Phenom II X6 1090T chip. It is a modern, 64-bit, fast CPU that is energy efficient and performs particularly well with multi-threaded applications. It is also substantially less expensive than an Intel equivalent. If it were my build, I would choose a low-power CPU, but my friend insisted on six cores and more power.

Memory

I chose two ADATA DDR3 PC1333 4-GB sticks for the total of 8 GB. This particular motherboard has only two RAM slots but if you plan to use RAM-intensive applications, such as large databases, you should probably go with an mATX motherboard that supports offers four RAM slots. For this particular build, 8 GB of RAM is going to be sufficient.

Hard drives

For this build, I was mostly interested in typical file server applications, so our priority is cool and quiet operation rather than the highest speed. The Western Digital Caviar Green-series of hard drives has a proven track record, particularly for file serves. Those are excellent storage drives. I chose four 1TB WD drives for storage.

I also needed a hard drive for the operating system. I was thinking of using an SSD, but it would substantially increase the cost of the build because the OS requires 160 GB. Therefore, I went with a 500 GB Seagate 7200 RPM hard drive. It performs a bit faster than the WD drives and is perfect as a system drive.

RAID controller

I ended up with the total of 4.5 TB of storage. However, not all of it is going to be usable storage. The 500 GB drive is going to have a separate partition for the operating system, and a small storage partition, which I will leave empty for now. All of the data storage is going to reside on the 4-disk drive array (RAID 5). It is a simple, yet effective strategy.

A hardware-based RAID 5 is going to perform much faster and is independent of the server operating system. I believe that it is a better option, despite being more expensive. Therefore, for this build I chose the Areca ARC-1210 PCI-Express x8 SATA II (3.0Gb/s) Controller Card. I'd never used an Areca card before, but I had read good reviews and found it to be compatible with both Linux and Windows-based file servers.

Power supply

I chose the modular OCZ 80+ efficient power supply, but any good PSU from a reputable brand should be sufficient.

Operating system

The person for whom I am building this server prefers a Microsoft OS because it fits perfectly with their work environment. The Windows Home Server 2011 is a particularly good choice, especially for people who are not experience system administrators. It is a solid OS, based on Windows Server 2008, but it has an overlay of very useful and user-friendly features, such as automatic backup/restore of workgroup computers, serving media files, remote music and video streaming (including smartphones and tablets), and many other useful features. In terms of speed and stability, it is an excellent choice as well. Finally, it is rather inexpensive at less than $60 for the OEM version.

Image

Putting it together

The Areca RAID controller turned out to be pleasure to work with. It installed without the slightest problem. Once you've installed the OS, you can set up a very handy web utility that allows you to control the array from within a web browser. The WD drives work nicely. The entire array is fast.

Image

Fast, cool, but not quiet enough

The OS performs all the functions as expected. The only problem is noise. I think that replacing the RAID controller fan with the provided heatsink would help, but the biggest benefit should come from replacing the CPU heatsink. This rig is already pretty expensive. So I'd like to keep the price of this upgrade below $100. Any ideas?

Image

Thanks!

KadazanPL
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:58 am
Location: Poland

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by KadazanPL » Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:30 pm

Interesting read, thanks! I hope the server will perform flawlessly.
As for the loud CPU heatsink I would get Scythe Mugen 2 and be done with it :) You say that there's a passive heatsink included with the RAID controller? What prevents you from trying it out?

HFat
Posts: 1753
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 am
Location: Switzerland

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by HFat » Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:26 am

I don't understand your choices if it's a file server. But if it is really a file server, you don't need to spend more than $0: underclock the CPU (and possibly disable a few cores) and the fan will never need to spin up.
Other than that, yeah, replacing the heatsink would be the obvious fix.

kuzzia
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 709
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 4:41 am
Location: Denmark

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by kuzzia » Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:25 am

If the CPU is never pushed to 100 %, then a cheap heat sink should be sufficient to cool the CPU quietly. Perhaps a Cooler Master Hyper 212 plus, or Xigmatek. At a slightly higher price, the Scythe Mugen 2 excels. It also ships with a superb stock fan.

quest_for_silence
Posts: 5275
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:12 am
Location: ITALY

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by quest_for_silence » Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:50 am

HFat wrote:and the fan will never need to spin up.

As he's running Windows, what about giving a try to SpeedFan priorly?

Akustyk
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:49 pm

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by Akustyk » Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:32 am

HFat wrote:I don't understand your choices if it's a file server. But if it is really a file server, you don't need to spend more than $0: underclock the CPU (and possibly disable a few cores) and the fan will never need to spin up.
Other than that, yeah, replacing the heatsink would be the obvious fix.
Thanks for the suggestion! Unfortunately, the hardware choices were not up to me; I would have chosen a low-voltage CPU, but my friend is an engineer and the server will run some of his simulations so he insisted on multi-core and lots of computational power. Also, the server does real-time transcoding of audio and video for streaming, and that requires more power, as well. So I will have to try a new heatsink.

Akustyk
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:49 pm

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by Akustyk » Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:33 am

quest_for_silence wrote:
HFat wrote:and the fan will never need to spin up.

As he's running Windows, what about giving a try to SpeedFan priorly?
This is an excellent idea. I will try it out. I've read very positive reviews of this software.

Akustyk
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 12:49 pm

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by Akustyk » Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:37 am

KadazanPL wrote:Interesting read, thanks! I hope the server will perform flawlessly.
As for the loud CPU heatsink I would get Scythe Mugen 2 and be done with it :) You say that there's a passive heatsink included with the RAID controller? What prevents you from trying it out?
I will try the heatsink on the RAID controller and see if it overheats. So far, two votes for the Scythe Mugen 2. It seems compatible with the AMD socket and small enough to fit in the case. I think I will have no trouble convincing my friend to spend $50 on it.

AznJason
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 10:29 am

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by AznJason » Sat Oct 22, 2011 1:49 pm

I replaced the fan on my Areca ARC-1880i with a Scythe Mini-Kaze. I needed new screws to mount it, but it did a good job. My temps went up from ~41C to ~50C but the noise became infinitely better.

protellect
Posts: 312
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:57 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: File server needs silencing

Post by protellect » Sat Oct 22, 2011 6:50 pm

unsupported drives on your areca card ... don't take my word for it but those drives might fall out of the raid5 array

Post Reply