Quads, now it's starting to get interesting

A forum just for SPCR's folding team... by request.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
aristide1
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 4284
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Undisclosed but sober in US

Quads, now it's starting to get interesting

Post by aristide1 » Thu Jan 10, 2008 5:15 pm

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819103244

A quad. An AMD 2.3GHz quad.

An unlocked quad.

$240

angelkiller
Posts: 871
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:37 am
Location: North Carolina

Re: Quads, now it's starting to get interesting

Post by angelkiller » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:13 pm

aristide1 wrote:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6819103244

A quad. An AMD 2.3GHz quad.

An unlocked quad.

$240
Wow! :shock: I would love to see its PPD/$ of CPU. Anyone have any F@H results with these things?

aristide1
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 4284
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Undisclosed but sober in US

Re: Quads, now it's starting to get interesting

Post by aristide1 » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:23 pm

angelkiller wrote:....Anyone have any F@H results with these things?
Yeah I Googled that and found some guy getting 14 minute checkpoints on a 1760 pointer (P2653). Ummmm, not impressive at all. My OC'd E6400 is running faster than that. :?

Dutchmm
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:06 am

Depends ...

Post by Dutchmm » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:48 am

According to fahinfo.org, you can get around 255 PPD per gigahertz per core from the Phenom. That's 1020 PPD per gigahertz. In Europe, a locked Phenom costs around Euro 80 per Ghz. An unlocked phenom comes in around Euro 90 per Ghz at its nominal clock speed, but will probably (evidence, anyone?) OC to a much higher level.
Taking the lower number as a safe banker, you get 13 PPD per Euro.

By comparison, the best Core 2 Duo score is 325 PPD per Ghz. I cannot identify which CPU this was on, and the comparison I offer is based on the Conroe. Here we have 317 PPD per Ghz per core, or 634 PPD per Ghz. Prices in Europe vary from around Euro 40/Ghz at the 21x0 end of the scale, through to Euro 60/Ghz at the E6750 (which is cheaper than Aris' E6400). If you use the low end price, this gives you a nominal 16PPD per Euro; if you take the high end price, the answer is about 10 PPD per Euro.

Of Course we are ignoring overclockability. I have read about people clocking their 2160 to nearly 4Ghz (probably members of the loud pc review team), but I have as yet no anecdotal evidence on the AMD Quads.

aristide1
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 4284
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Undisclosed but sober in US

Re: Depends ...

Post by aristide1 » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:52 am

Dutchmm wrote:...the E6750 (which is cheaper than Aris' E6400).....
Yes, I've seen that. It has a mutiplier of 7, like the E6300. I'm sure Intel is aware of people overclocking, and the multiplier appears to be a factor in the price. The only way to get this up to 3.5GHz is to set the FSB to 500, that's a bit of a stretch. :shock:

Dutchmm
Posts: 106
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:06 am

8 Actually

Post by Dutchmm » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:41 am

Yes, I've seen that. It has a mutiplier of 7, like the E6300
The limit is 8 - I am running my FSB at 400. Which is easy. I am waiting until my wife's 2160 is up and folding to see whether I can run the FSB at 3500/9. If I could do that in my head, I could have gone on working as a CPA ROFL.

Post Reply