Post your PPWs
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Post your PPWs
Updated unmbers:
Celeron 2.4 GHz @2.9 GHz - 400-550 PPW
AMD Athlon 2000+ XP @1.73 GHz - 440-500 PPW
Intel Pentium 3 850 @1054 MHz - 200-250 PPW
All above are using SSE.
The numbers vary a lot depending on the WU.
Celeron 2.4 GHz @2.9 GHz - 400-550 PPW
AMD Athlon 2000+ XP @1.73 GHz - 440-500 PPW
Intel Pentium 3 850 @1054 MHz - 200-250 PPW
All above are using SSE.
The numbers vary a lot depending on the WU.
Last edited by ColdFlame on Tue Dec 02, 2003 9:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
How to determine the number of points a particular machine has produced over a period of time?
I could use Electron Microscope's estimates for the current WU, but it seems to me there is considerable variation from one WU to the next, so picking a WU at random wouldn't seem to be a fair measure.
I agree that PPW would be a more stable measure, but short of manually keeping track, how do I calculate this?
David
I could use Electron Microscope's estimates for the current WU, but it seems to me there is considerable variation from one WU to the next, so picking a WU at random wouldn't seem to be a fair measure.
I agree that PPW would be a more stable measure, but short of manually keeping track, how do I calculate this?
David
FAH Stats
Nice and clean. I much prefer it to EM now. Cleaner, simpler, easier. Did I mention its cleaner look?
And the PPW isn't really any more 'stable' than PPD, as its just PPD*7. But its more closely related to the standings on the EOC stats page, and the weekly score for color coding. 1k, 2.5k, etc.
Nice and clean. I much prefer it to EM now. Cleaner, simpler, easier. Did I mention its cleaner look?
And the PPW isn't really any more 'stable' than PPD, as its just PPD*7. But its more closely related to the standings on the EOC stats page, and the weekly score for color coding. 1k, 2.5k, etc.
I guess I was looking for something that told me how many points a particular machine had produced over a period of 168 hours, rather than a simple calculation based on the current WU. At least that would average several WU's.
David
David
Last edited by haysdb on Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
True, I think FAH Stats (he's looking for a new, snazzier name for it) only pulls the point value off the current WU. And even then, off the most recent frame time.
But I glance at it often enough to recognize the differences in production between WU. Like right now my 1700 TBred is scored at 372ppw. Noticeably lower than its usual of ~450ppw. Agreed though, something that kept track of the last week of the work log would be a bit more useful.
But I glance at it often enough to recognize the differences in production between WU. Like right now my 1700 TBred is scored at 372ppw. Noticeably lower than its usual of ~450ppw. Agreed though, something that kept track of the last week of the work log would be a bit more useful.
Zyzzyx, I also have FAH Stats and my overview is always zero in al chapters (ppd ppw ...). What am I doing wrong? Do I have to do something or is it supposed to work "right out the box"? I have it configured to show 4 computers which normally are not all on at the same time, only mine. Also Web Stats shows stats about Buzzard, it's that a working feature? how can I configure it so it shows my stats?
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 2:18 pm
- Location: East TX
It's in the "common" subdirectory, and it is called user.redir.html. Just change the line with the HTML link to match the one given on your Arachnid stats page. It's called your MOBILE Stats URL.
Yes, the weekly production is just calculated from the last frame, so it varies with the usage of the computer. Maybe next version...
Yes, the weekly production is just calculated from the last frame, so it varies with the usage of the computer. Maybe next version...
tangled has it right regarding changing the webstats to show the right location.
regarding the 0 ppd showing, have you updated the protein info? Under 'Settings', 'General Settings', there is an Update button for the protein info. If it doesn't have the latest info, it might not know how many points your current WU is. Also, I think it has to have the computer on to get the stats. It reads directly from the updated log file.
regarding the 0 ppd showing, have you updated the protein info? Under 'Settings', 'General Settings', there is an Update button for the protein info. If it doesn't have the latest info, it might not know how many points your current WU is. Also, I think it has to have the computer on to get the stats. It reads directly from the updated log file.
It will show that until the computer finishes another WU frame. It only reads the log file from the time that you start FAHStats. It doesn't appear to read back to find the previous frame time. Thus, it should show up with a frame time and ppd/ppw once the computer finishes another frame. Also, check the 'Refresh Interval' on FAHStats and set that to ~10 minutes (my average frame time).
Does it show the score and deadline information for the proteins?
Does it show the score and deadline information for the proteins?
Thanks to the tips provided above, especially about pasting the link, which I would have NEVER figured out on my own, I have "FAH LogStats 0.69" up and running. Here is what it's telling me each of my machines is producing:
Based on this small sample, the Hyperthreaded P4 is easily the price-no-object champion, but the overachieving Athlon turns in a quite respectable performance.
David
Code: Select all
PPD PPW
P4C 2.4 120 829 (Total for 2 clients, HT enabled)
P4B 2.66 93 648
P4B 2.4 82 577
Athlon 2000+ 72 520 (Beta 4 w/ -forceSSE)
--- ----
Total EST 367 2564
David
Last edited by haysdb on Tue Dec 02, 2003 12:13 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Yes Zyzzyx, it's showing everything except ppd/ppw (it shows a ?). That's the strange thing, if the program just calculate ppd/ppw with current frame time and anything else is showing correctly why the hell is not calculating ppd/ppw (I could even do it myself with a calculator ). Really really strange.