Team MacOSx and Negative Points
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 5:54 pm
Team MacOSx and Negative Points
I just scrolled through their stats (about 4 or 5 pages into the user stats) at the Arachnids page and noticed that a lot of their folders have negative points for the last update/day/week. Some have over a 1000 points one has almost 9000 pt deduction.
I wonder whats up with that?
I wonder whats up with that?
Something looks up for sure. Loking at (for example) NoahJ, it looks like there's a serious problem since points are added and then removed.
-
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 5:54 pm
Really really strange.
Did you notice that NoahJ's stats at either Dyyryath or EOC stats are way higher than official stats
131030 vs 5695 points !!!!
I don't want to precipate but this smells really bad, don't you think?
Did you notice that NoahJ's stats at either Dyyryath or EOC stats are way higher than official stats
131030 vs 5695 points !!!!
I don't want to precipate but this smells really bad, don't you think?
Actually, you can just check the names on the team at the team page at Stanford, http://folding.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/teampage?q=1971 , and see that the numbers are not matching up.
I'll be looking further into this when I get home tonight, and probably pose this as a question over at Folding-Community.
I'll be looking further into this when I get home tonight, and probably pose this as a question over at Folding-Community.
-
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 5:54 pm
Check this out http://stats.zerothelement.com/cgi-bin/ ... ?team=1971 over 119,716 points in one day! (NoahJ)Now that is some serious folding. Scroll down the page and there is some other serious folders. You May also notice the NoahJ is also listed at #67 with a NEGATIVE 119,716 pts for the day. Many of them have scored 90+% of their total points in the last 24hrs. Quite a few 8000 - 9000 point folders in the last 24 hrs.
These stats are much different than the ones at stanford. According to their team stats the 119,716 point (NoahJ) has ZERO active processors in the last 7 days. http://folding.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/userpage?name=NoahJ
Arachnid's stats are definitely off because the teams points for the day are less than one persons. I wonder why? What I am realy wondering is why are the stanford stats page also wrong, there are a lot of their top folders with ZERO active processors. NoahJ is #2 AND #67 (both Zero active)
Here is some math to think about. NoahJ #2 119,716 (Last 24hrs points) + 5,695 (NoahJ #67 's total points) + 40 (NoahJ' last update pts) = 125,451(NoahJ #2 total points).
Shouldn't #67 have zero total pts?
Of course this is repeated over and over with others, except they are the ones that only produced 8000 - 9000 pts in the last 24 hrs and they are listed again with the negative points points for the last 24hrs many pages later. BUT they still have some left over total points!
These stats are much different than the ones at stanford. According to their team stats the 119,716 point (NoahJ) has ZERO active processors in the last 7 days. http://folding.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/userpage?name=NoahJ
Arachnid's stats are definitely off because the teams points for the day are less than one persons. I wonder why? What I am realy wondering is why are the stanford stats page also wrong, there are a lot of their top folders with ZERO active processors. NoahJ is #2 AND #67 (both Zero active)
Here is some math to think about. NoahJ #2 119,716 (Last 24hrs points) + 5,695 (NoahJ #67 's total points) + 40 (NoahJ' last update pts) = 125,451(NoahJ #2 total points).
Shouldn't #67 have zero total pts?
Of course this is repeated over and over with others, except they are the ones that only produced 8000 - 9000 pts in the last 24 hrs and they are listed again with the negative points points for the last 24hrs many pages later. BUT they still have some left over total points!
-
- Posts: 542
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 5:54 pm
I just posted this question at http://forum.folding-community.org/view ... 1665#51665
I'm really curious about this.
I'm really curious about this.