REALLY!NeilBlanchard wrote:Hi,
I'm not a climatologist -- are you? There is no scientific controversy; only that caused by those paid by energy companies.
Do you not also think that those who are contracted to study global warming by governments, corporations like GE, and environmentalist groups are also not under pressure to prove it exists? They wouldn't have a job if they proved AGW didn't exist. But that is not scientific and cannot be proven, so those of us who actually study the science of GW chose to ignore it.
You don't even know the science. You just know what you've been told by the Huffington Post. That conspiracies are the only scientific dissenters, that only the religious right doesn't believe in AGW, and that a few degrees of warming will mean the end of civilization.
You don't study science, you BELIEVE in science just like the religious believe in God. Science, and the belief that science is what explains that around you is your faith. You think you are so high and mighty because you believe in Darwin, in AGW, and that science can explain all, but really, you've only replaced 'science' for 'religion'. You still take everything based on faith given to you by your political and environmental idols.
Nobody here that expressed skepticism in AGW has done so using evidence of God. Proving your first post completely false. Yet, you won't let that disrupt your illogical faith in your god-like environmental idols.
You've drank the kool aid and there is no helping you. I was hoping that logic, not idealolgy and conspiracy theories were going to be the topic of the day. I am truely sorry that you are so closed minded about climate theory science.