power draw figures of Radeon X800 available?

They make noise, too.

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
jojo4u
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 7:00 am
Location: Germany

power draw figures of Radeon X800 available?

Post by jojo4u » Tue May 04, 2004 3:00 pm

The subject says it all...

Rusty075
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 4000
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Contact:

Post by Rusty075 » Tue May 04, 2004 3:45 pm

While not the best source for computer hardware knowledge: THG's review of the X800 includes power draw figures.

Leto
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 5:35 am

Post by Leto » Tue May 04, 2004 3:46 pm

Yes
'
X800 Pro = 58 W
X800 XT Platinum = 75 W

The X800 XT is less powerhungry than the 9800 XT

Wedge
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:59 pm
Location: NorthEast Arkansas, USA

Post by Wedge » Tue May 04, 2004 7:17 pm

Yeah...hot.

But how's this for coolness? (by comparison) -- HowHardware Review.

"One neat power connector, same power supply:
What is probably more impressive is the noted power consumption of these two new cards. As a reference point, the GeForce FX 6800 Ultra averages about 120Watts of power. The Radeon X800 XT averages about the same power consumption under load (68W or so) as a Radeon 9800 XT but the Radeon X800 XT actually consume about 33% less power (38W vs. 58W) at idle versus the Radeon 9800XT. So, we're looking at a potential performance gain of 2X over legacy product, with actually less over all power consumption. The ASIC and Board Design Engineers at ATi should be very proud parents and helping them along their way is TSMC's .13 micro low-k manufacturing process technology."

halcyon
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 1115
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 3:52 am
Location: EU

Post by halcyon » Wed May 05, 2004 12:42 am

Yippee! Realatively good news for the hc gamers amongst us. Of course it would have been nice if the draw figures were even lower, but after the nV40 fiasco I was really expecting the worst.

Now if the price was just a little bit more manageable :)

jojo4u
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2002 7:00 am
Location: Germany

Post by jojo4u » Wed May 05, 2004 2:39 am

Thank you for your replies. Hopefully one hardwarepage will also supply idle power draw, which i consider more important, in the future.

EDIT: Sorry about the idle topic. Note to self: don't do quick overview shortly after getting up.
Last edited by jojo4u on Wed May 05, 2004 5:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Wedge
Posts: 1360
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:59 pm
Location: NorthEast Arkansas, USA

Post by Wedge » Wed May 05, 2004 3:47 am

jojo4u wrote:Thank you for your replies. Hopefully one hardwarepage will also supply idle power draw, which i consider more important, in the future.
I just post idle power draw for the new X800 pro. Re-read my quote above.

janderk27
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2003 8:06 am

Post by janderk27 » Wed May 05, 2004 3:50 am

I am looking around for a video card to power my new large TFT screen and this certainly seems a good candidate. Using the ATI 9800 is out of the question as it draws too much power in idle. The new X800 is much closer to 9600 levels in idle. And the fan reduces in speed to, so noise should be pretty low when doing 2D stuff.

Here are a couple of other reviews that say something about the power requirement and noise.

Techreport
The Radeon X800 Pro actually pulls less juice than the Radeon 9800 XT, believe it or not, and the Radeon X800 XT PE only requires a little more power than the 9800 XT. At idle, the new ATI GPUs consume much less power than the 9800 XT, as well.
Hexus.net
The fan adjusts speed based on temperature, slowing down to a barely audible noise when in Windows or doing light 3D. At full speed it's somewhat noisy, but no more so than the NV40 reference cooler and definitely quieter than an ASUS 9800 XT cooler at full fan speed.

Subjectively excellent, the slower fan speed in 2D mode contributing to that.
Beyond3D
R420 features an on-die thermal probe which constantly monitors the temperature and different fan speed steppings are set in the BIOS to different temperature ranges, hence the fan will run at lower speeds when the chip is running cool and higher speeds when its hotter. The temperature and speed steppings are manufacturer configurable.
Jan Derk

Post Reply