X-bit labs takes a look at Vidcard Power Consumption
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
X-bit labs takes a look at Vidcard Power Consumption
Part I looks at contemporary graphics cards on ATI chips
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/ ... rcons.html
Looks like lots of useful information for enthusiasts. I assume part Part II is to follow.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/ ... rcons.html
Looks like lots of useful information for enthusiasts. I assume part Part II is to follow.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Finland
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:31 am
- Location: New Zealand
Must say im highly impressed with the article, cant wait for the Nvidia follow up. Its about time definitive mesurements were made.
Ive never used a ATI card(ive only had 1 new card since my GeForce SDR) but the readings on the 9600 are amazing, i knew it was low but not that low, needless to say for silent video cards its where its at.
Bring on round 2
Ive never used a ATI card(ive only had 1 new card since my GeForce SDR) but the readings on the 9600 are amazing, i knew it was low but not that low, needless to say for silent video cards its where its at.
Bring on round 2
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Finland
Well, this is what he says:burcakb wrote:I still didn't get how he got to supply the AGP voltages through the shunt, especiall the 3.3V line.
The 3.3V rail is present on the extra mobo connector. He would have needed a separate shunt for the AGP with multiple leads soldered to the graphics card. Pity he didn't provide a picture to prove he really did that.What to do? I took it easy and just insulated the appropriate pins of the AGP connector on the graphics card with stripes of adhesive tape (pin A1 – 12v; pins B2, B3 – 5v; pins A9, B9, A16, B16, A25, B25, A28, B28 – 3.3v) and applied those voltages directly to the graphics card, through the prepared shunt, taking the voltages from the PSU.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Finland
You mean tapping the motherboard power connectors? I hope not. That would throw some suspicion over validity of the results in general.sthayashi wrote:I wonder though if he just tapped into the motherboard, which would be much easier to perform the tests.
IMHO, the best way to do this would be to prepare a shim card that goes into the AGP slot and provides an AGP connector for the graphics card and all the necessary measurement points. Shouldn't be too hard to do if you have the equipment.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 3:31 am
- Location: New Zealand
You mean like an AGP version of a PCI Riser card? im pretty sure you can get right angle AGP adapters out there, I know you can get PCI ones.Inexplicable wrote: IMHO, the best way to do this would be to prepare a shim card that goes into the AGP slot and provides an AGP connector for the graphics card and all the necessary measurement points. Shouldn't be too hard to do if you have the equipment.
If you wanted to be really handy though, i guess if you had an old mobo and an old agp card you were willing to rip apart plus a soldering iron and you were really bored, i guess it could be DIY'ed
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Finland
Sounds like just the thing. There seem to be a bunch of different kinds here:Uberman1080 wrote:You mean like an AGP version of a PCI Riser card? im pretty sure you can get right angle AGP adapters out there, I know you can get PCI ones.
http://www.mycableshop.com/3rd_Level/AG ... s-Misc.htm
Leto wrote:How is the power consumption of the 6800 GT?
I don't have any data to back this up, but my supposition is that they will consume more power than the newest generation of ATI cards.
Even before seeing this article, I knew that the X800 and X800 XT were able to consume less power than their predecessors at idle and no more at load. Quite a feat of engineering.
If somebody has similar information about the 6800 series by Nvidia, please post it at this thread.
X-bit labs have updated their site with the Nvidia benchmarks
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/ ... power.html
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/ ... power.html
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Finland
You can't just compare the used wattage. According to the article the problem is that some nVidia cards use a lot of 12 V. So even if a system uses 200 W and have a 350 W PSU, it might not work properly because the PSU can't deliver 12 V enough. That's why a 450-550 W PSU is recommended for these cards.Inexplicable wrote:Well, well. Looks like nVidia is not doing quite as badly as people feared.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Finland
The difference to ATI is hardly that drastic. The 6800U pulls 15W more than the X800XT PE from the 12V rail. While that is not insignificant, a decent 300W PSU can easily supply over 200W at 12V. Those PSU recommendations are just a proactive measure to cut down support requests from people who tend to buy the cheapest crappiest no-name PSU they can find.Mats wrote:You can't just compare the used wattage. According to the article the problem is that some nVidia cards use a lot of 12 V. So even if a system uses 200 W and have a 350 W PSU, it might not work properly because the PSU can't deliver 12 V enough. That's why a 450-550 W PSU is recommended for these cards.
The new generation of video cards has shifted power draw away from the 5V and 3.3V lines toward 12V. Total power draw hasn't changed that much under load, but the 12V line is going to be providing most of the power for the GPU and CPU on most modern motherboards. Generic 300W, 400W, etc. PSU power labels didn't mean that much before and they mean even less with newer systems and the latest graphics cards. Read the fine print on the PSUs for the important data.