CoolIT Systems Peltier/Liquid Cooling... Extreme Tech review
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
CoolIT Systems Peltier/Liquid Cooling... Extreme Tech review
Extreme Tech looked at a Peltier cooler... interesting...
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1 ... 683,00.asp
What do you tweakers think?
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1 ... 683,00.asp
What do you tweakers think?
Re: CoolIT Systems Peltier/Liquid Cooling... Extreme Tech re
I like the closed system, but it's really noisy:John Reid wrote:Extreme Tech looked at a Peltier cooler... interesting...
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1 ... 683,00.asp
What do you tweakers think?
"The Freezone's fan/pump combo emits a constant low hum we found very tolerable. Unlike some air coolers that get louder as fan RPMs increase, operation is quiet both at idle and under load. In 37.5dB ambient conditions, we measured idle noise output at 44.1dB. Under load with the potentiometer turned all the way up, noise output increased slightly to 44.5dB. "
It's also expensive: $400
Now if they could make it run with a liquid metal in the cooling loop and one of those silent magnetic pump thingies, and have cooling loops for the video card and northbridge.........
The first thing I notice is that the reviewer is woefully misinformed about how refrigeration works. There are actually refrigeration-driven CPU coolers out there (like vapochill), but I hear they're noisy as hell. Nice misleading chart on page 3...
It's an interesting idea to move the peltiers off of the chip, but I wonder how much heat those peltiers are responsible for themselves, from both waste heat and power demands.
Heh. Liquid metal. That'd bring the cost down.
It's an interesting idea to move the peltiers off of the chip, but I wonder how much heat those peltiers are responsible for themselves, from both waste heat and power demands.
Heh. Liquid metal. That'd bring the cost down.
They are very inefficient devices and will contribute at least as much heat of their own as the CPU itself. Since they produce only heat as output, that is also how much electrical power they need.quizzicus wrote:...I wonder how much heat those peltiers are responsible for themselves, from both waste heat and power demands...
It depends on how you use them. See my analysis in this thread.Mr Evil wrote:They are very inefficient devices and will contribute at least as much heat of their own as the CPU itself. Since they produce only heat as output, that is also how much electrical power they need.
To be a bit more verbose: Heatpumps with high CoP (coefficient of performance) can be really useful for silencing people, if used properly.
What this means in practice is that if you are going to employ TECs, you should carefully engineer you configuration beforehand to ensure that the system really has high CoP. And usually getting higher CoP means you need several TECs in parallel, which costs you more money up-front. It also pretty much counts out systems where TEC is sitting right on the top of the CPU, as it comes soon awkward to place 4 to 6 50x50mm pieces _parallel_ on top of the CPU .
But used between heatsink/radiator and water loop they might really give you some silence advantage: If you can raise the temperature gradient between heatsink surface and air to double, it means you can dissipate twice the heat with same airflow. And more heat dissipated with same airflow equals to less noise per same system wattage.
TECs are a bit tricky as many of their electrical and thermal properties are non-intuitive and non-linear, but they are small and contain no moving parts and can work wonders if utilized properly and you are ready to pay almost the compressor-based price up-front.
What this means in practice is that if you are going to employ TECs, you should carefully engineer you configuration beforehand to ensure that the system really has high CoP. And usually getting higher CoP means you need several TECs in parallel, which costs you more money up-front. It also pretty much counts out systems where TEC is sitting right on the top of the CPU, as it comes soon awkward to place 4 to 6 50x50mm pieces _parallel_ on top of the CPU .
But used between heatsink/radiator and water loop they might really give you some silence advantage: If you can raise the temperature gradient between heatsink surface and air to double, it means you can dissipate twice the heat with same airflow. And more heat dissipated with same airflow equals to less noise per same system wattage.
TECs are a bit tricky as many of their electrical and thermal properties are non-intuitive and non-linear, but they are small and contain no moving parts and can work wonders if utilized properly and you are ready to pay almost the compressor-based price up-front.
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm
Some added info for anyone thats curious about TECs.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/for ... y.php?f=94
Recommend the 1st and 3rd sticky. Have been told they aren't 100% accurate but its good content for someone who knows nothing about TECs.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/for ... y.php?f=94
Recommend the 1st and 3rd sticky. Have been told they aren't 100% accurate but its good content for someone who knows nothing about TECs.