CoolIT Systems Peltier/Liquid Cooling... Extreme Tech review

The alternative to direct air cooling

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
John Reid
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:36 pm

CoolIT Systems Peltier/Liquid Cooling... Extreme Tech review

Post by John Reid » Tue Mar 14, 2006 1:58 pm

Extreme Tech looked at a Peltier cooler... interesting...

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1 ... 683,00.asp

What do you tweakers think?

Buddabing
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2003 11:50 am
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: CoolIT Systems Peltier/Liquid Cooling... Extreme Tech re

Post by Buddabing » Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:18 pm

John Reid wrote:Extreme Tech looked at a Peltier cooler... interesting...

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1 ... 683,00.asp

What do you tweakers think?
I like the closed system, but it's really noisy:

"The Freezone's fan/pump combo emits a constant low hum we found very tolerable. Unlike some air coolers that get louder as fan RPMs increase, operation is quiet both at idle and under load. In 37.5dB ambient conditions, we measured idle noise output at 44.1dB. Under load with the potentiometer turned all the way up, noise output increased slightly to 44.5dB. "

It's also expensive: $400

Now if they could make it run with a liquid metal in the cooling loop and one of those silent magnetic pump thingies, and have cooling loops for the video card and northbridge.........

Devonavar
SPCR Reviewer
Posts: 1850
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada

Post by Devonavar » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:38 pm

I very much doubt that Extremetech's dBA numbers are comparable to ours. Different measurement methodologies lead to different results. I'd pay closer attention to their subjective account.

quizzicus
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2005 12:10 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA USA

Post by quizzicus » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:59 pm

The first thing I notice is that the reviewer is woefully misinformed about how refrigeration works. There are actually refrigeration-driven CPU coolers out there (like vapochill), but I hear they're noisy as hell. Nice misleading chart on page 3...

It's an interesting idea to move the peltiers off of the chip, but I wonder how much heat those peltiers are responsible for themselves, from both waste heat and power demands.

Heh. Liquid metal. That'd bring the cost down. :roll: :lol:

Mr Evil
Posts: 566
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:12 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Mr Evil » Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:29 am

quizzicus wrote:...I wonder how much heat those peltiers are responsible for themselves, from both waste heat and power demands...
They are very inefficient devices and will contribute at least as much heat of their own as the CPU itself. Since they produce only heat as output, that is also how much electrical power they need.

John Reid
Posts: 25
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by John Reid » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:20 am

See? This is why I like this forum... people with experience giving opinoins. Maybe they should make chips that run at lower temps in the first place...

zds
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Contact:

Post by zds » Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:37 am

Mr Evil wrote:They are very inefficient devices and will contribute at least as much heat of their own as the CPU itself. Since they produce only heat as output, that is also how much electrical power they need.
It depends on how you use them. See my analysis in this thread.

zds
Posts: 261
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Contact:

Post by zds » Thu Mar 16, 2006 5:49 am

To be a bit more verbose: Heatpumps with high CoP (coefficient of performance) can be really useful for silencing people, if used properly.

What this means in practice is that if you are going to employ TECs, you should carefully engineer you configuration beforehand to ensure that the system really has high CoP. And usually getting higher CoP means you need several TECs in parallel, which costs you more money up-front. It also pretty much counts out systems where TEC is sitting right on the top of the CPU, as it comes soon awkward to place 4 to 6 50x50mm pieces _parallel_ on top of the CPU :D.

But used between heatsink/radiator and water loop they might really give you some silence advantage: If you can raise the temperature gradient between heatsink surface and air to double, it means you can dissipate twice the heat with same airflow. And more heat dissipated with same airflow equals to less noise per same system wattage.

TECs are a bit tricky as many of their electrical and thermal properties are non-intuitive and non-linear, but they are small and contain no moving parts and can work wonders if utilized properly and you are ready to pay almost the compressor-based price up-front.

jamesavery22
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 3:19 pm

Post by jamesavery22 » Tue Mar 28, 2006 2:53 pm

Some added info for anyone thats curious about TECs.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/for ... y.php?f=94

Recommend the 1st and 3rd sticky. Have been told they aren't 100% accurate but its good content for someone who knows nothing about TECs.

Butcher
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:58 am
Location: UK

Post by Butcher » Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:59 pm

In most cases TEC systems are going to be hot and noisy. If you're careful they're hot and quiet. But TECs dump a lot of heat into the loop regardless of how you use them, and cost a lot of run (think roughly tripling your comp running costs and you're in the right ballpark).

jmke
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 495
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 3:53 am
Location: In Front of PC
Contact:

Post by jmke » Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:52 am

7dBA over ambient will certainly be noticeable , but did they fail to mention at what distance they measured?

Post Reply