It is currently Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:36 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Power [Consumption] - Laptop as NAS/media server
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:15 pm
Posts: 25
Location: london
Hi,
I have a few old components and am thinking of going the the route of using an old laptop with an attached external drive to serve as a NAS but was wondering on what kind of power consumption I can expect.

I have an old Acer Aspire 3610 - Celeron 370 1.5G, 1.5gb RAM, 60Gb HDD - the screen was damaged, so I ripped it off. It will be used as a headless unit, possibly Windows Home Server or some flavour of Linux.

I also have a WD3200JS 320Gb SATA HDD, for which I was thinking of buying a USB/eSATA Enclosure.

It would be used primary as a NAS, for my Squeezebox and PS3, but also as a print server and maybe a VPN so I can securely connect when I am away. - This flexibility is why I want to set this up, rather than buy an external Nas box.

I know its a very vague question, but what kind of power consumption could I expect, if left on 24/7. The laptop has no display,no battery (always on mains) and I would disable Wireless (connected via ethernet only). Unfortunatley, the bios is very limitted, Wake On Lan would be a nice to have, I am not sure if its possible to load a custom bios with extra features such as this.

Im trying to workout the cost of leaving these devices (laptop/external HDD) on all the time. I know without some kind of meter I can't get a precise output, but even a ballpark figure would be fine. I would greatley appreciate any advise/recommendations.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm
Posts: 1406
Location: USA
I don't think this CPU has Speedstep, so I could see the laptop using maybe as high as 35W-AC at idle. That is worst case, though. Could be as good as 20W. My 1.7GHz Pentium M draws 12W with the screen off, but Speedstep makes a big difference.

An external 3.5" drive is going to run you 10-15W-AC. Going with an external 2.5" drive you'd probably be down to 5W-AC. Going with a 3.5" drive like the WD GreenPower that automatically unloads the heads very aggressively could also get you down close the 5W-AC mark and get you lots of GB/$.

So depending on configuration, I think you are looking at a draw of anywhere from 25 to 50W-AC. My guess would be 35W, especially if you go with an energy efficient external drive. Even 50W is pretty good for a modern desktop build, so I'd say this is a good use of what you've got lying around. A couple of notes:

* I wouldn't expect the laptop to survive more than 2 years of this use case because it is basically the opposite of the designed function.

* Look into revoSleep and similar utilities to potentially shut down the external drive when not in use. In a 24/7 situation, saving that 5W when idle, via a free utility, is a nice win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:31 am
Posts: 51
Location: Canada
jessekopelman wrote:
I don't think this CPU has Speedstep, so I could see the laptop using maybe as high as 35W-AC at idle. That is worst case, though. Could be as good as 20W. My 1.7GHz Pentium M draws 12W with the screen off, but Speedstep makes a big difference.

An external 3.5" drive is going to run you 10-15W-AC. Going with an external 2.5" drive you'd probably be down to 5W-AC. Going with a 3.5" drive like the WD GreenPower that automatically unloads the heads very aggressively could also get you down close the 5W-AC mark and get you lots of GB/$.

So depending on configuration, I think you are looking at a draw of anywhere from 25 to 50W-AC. My guess would be 35W, especially if you go with an energy efficient external drive. Even 50W is pretty good for a modern desktop build, so I'd say this is a good use of what you've got lying around. A couple of notes:

* I wouldn't expect the laptop to survive more than 2 years of this use case because it is basically the opposite of the designed function.

* Look into revoSleep and similar utilities to potentially shut down the external drive when not in use. In a 24/7 situation, saving that 5W when idle, via a free utility, is a nice win.


Wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group