Page 1 of 1

Power consumption review on Celeron or Sempron?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 2:27 pm
by perplex
Hello, has anyone ever found any reviews detailing power consumption of Celeron or Sempron CPUs? similar to the lostcircuits venice review.

Thanks.

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 3:01 pm
by dan
personally i think such information is of limited use.

my sempron 2800 i undervolted to 1.025 volts on a soltek gre and so it puts out 26 watts rather than 60 watts

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2005 4:17 pm
by StarfishChris
Assuming it outputs 60W in the first place, that is.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:02 am
by perplex
yeh :/ those TDP values come out of a lotto machine

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:01 am
by Ralf Hutter
Lots of Celeron numbers here, and this guy's numbers seem pretty darn accurate, certainly not obtained from a lotto machine at least.

Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:17 am
by perplex
nice link.

wow if those celeron numbers are correct i better forget about it!

Sempron for me i think :]

this http://www.goodwin.ee/sulo/Power2.htm is the best i've found so far

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:43 pm
by perplex
bit off topic, didnt' want to make another thread but would anyone be able to estimate what sempron my axp 2400+ would be equivalent to? because i'm thinking of getting sempron and would like to know the model that is comparable to my current cpu (axp 2400+) - thanks.

Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:08 pm
by larrymoencurly
My Socket A Sempron 3000+ (Barton core) mobo drew about 60W from the PSU while it ran MemTest86. Roughly 4.7A @ +12V and 3.5A @ +3.3V (almost nothing from the +5.0V), PC Chips M825g v. 9.2a mobo w/ integrated graphics.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 10:13 am
by alglove
perplex wrote:bit off topic, didnt' want to make another thread but would anyone be able to estimate what sempron my axp 2400+ would be equivalent to? because i'm thinking of getting sempron and would like to know the model that is comparable to my current cpu (axp 2400+) - thanks.
If you are sticking within Socket A, a Thoroughbred Athlon XP 2400+ is the same as a Socket A Sempron 2800+. They both have the same 2.0 GHz operating frequency, 333 MHz FSB, 256 kB cache, etc.

A Socket 754 Sempron 2800+ would have a slower clockspeed (1.6 GHz), but the faster memory architecture. It would probably be faster at some things (like games), but slower at others that are highly CPU dependent but not memory dependent (like MP3 encoding). Probably evens out, overall.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:37 am
by Blooz
Alglove -

The 2800+ Sempron indeed only has a 1.6 clockspeed "out of the box", but is easily capable of much, much more without a lot of effort.

Yesterday I finished 3 days of stability testing on my 2800+ that is running at 2.34 GHz at 1.54V. This chip runs at 31-32C idle, 42C extreme load with a Zalman 7000b cooler.

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:53 pm
by perplex
wow 60W :roll:

i think i might have to spend a little extra and get venice 3000+ for passive cooling then :?: i thought sempron's official power rating was in the 60 area but in actual usage was much lower :?: :!: :idea:

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 6:04 pm
by alglove
Well, I suppose you look at these values for the Athlon 64. Estimate that the Sempron power consumption will be no greater, and possibly less:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/di ... ice_5.html