It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 5:18 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: New AMD Turion 64 dual-core with 1.075V at full clock
PostPosted: Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 2:27 am
Posts: 774
Location: Quebec, Canada
From Laptop Logic:

Quote:
New AMD Mobile Dual Core Spotted

[...] this chip runs at a maximum clock of 1.8GHz and idles at 800MHz; much like current Turion 64 chips. What is most interesting from this is the voltage that this chip is able to use at full clock: a mere 1.075V! Current 90nm Turion 64 processors run at 1.45V default, that is an amazing drop!

[...] When at 800MHz, the processor operates at 0.9V. While we have seen no power consumption figures, it is fair to assume from this that Turion will be very power efficient at idle and maximum clock.


Laptop Logic had to remove the exclusive screenshot, so it's no longer there. However, the same screenshot was posted on matbe:

Image

(Click on the picture to enlarge)

_________________
Zalman LQ1000 liquid cooled case + dampening material + PVC tubes + MCP350 with EK top (acetal) and decoupling kit + Nexus 120mm + Xigmatek 200mm + HDD cage removed | Asus Maximus III Formula (ROG) | Intel Core I7 870 + EK Supreme (acetal) | 8GB Kingston | AMD Radeon HD 5850 1GB O/C + EK full cover block (acetal) | Western Digital Black 1TB + NoVibes III + Nexus 120mm (5V) | Seasonic X-850


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:18 am 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:25 am
Posts: 260
Very impressive... if true.

Early leaks do tend to talk up products to be better than they actually are so let's hope this one is correct. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 278
So the TDP on this would be in the 35 watt range? It would be similar to the 3800 runing at 1.1v that some people are doing now right?
Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 1608
Location: United States
FWIW, I was able to run my old Turion64 MT-34 (1.8GHz, 1MB) at 1.1V completely stable, 1.075V pretty stable (would get random crashes every few days). 1.075V doesn't seem too crazy for a dual-core 90nm Turion64.

_________________
Corsair Obsidian 650D | Seasonic X-650 | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 | Phenom II X4 955 | Noctua NH-D14 | 2x4GB Corsair DDR3-1600 | ASUS HD6950 DirectCU II 2GB | OCZ Vertex 2 120GB | 2x WD Green 1TB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:55 am
Posts: 5085
Location: UK
Quote:
I was able to run my old Turion64 MT-34 (1.8GHz, 1MB) at 1.1V completely stable


Were you able to cool it passively at that voltage or was it still putting out too much heat?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 2465
Location: Vancouver, BC
IIRC he was running it passive with a Scythe NCU-2000 with a Seasonic S12 fan being the only exhaust.

_________________
Thinkpad X200 – SSD bliss, T60p – loud hard drive, Core Duo whine :(
Nothing endures but change


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:02 pm
Posts: 1608
Location: United States
Yes, I actually have a thread in the gallery forum about it if you're interested.

With a Scythe NCU-2005 and Seasonic S12-300 @ 700-800RPM, CPU load was around 39*C. I later tried an internal DC-DC converter instead of the Seasonic and tried running the computer completely passive with no fans. IIRC CPU load only climbed to like 45-50*C or so. What's funny (I think, at least) is that heat from other components, such as the northbridge and voltage regulators/MOSFETs, worried me much more than the CPU. :P

_________________
Corsair Obsidian 650D | Seasonic X-650 | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 | Phenom II X4 955 | Noctua NH-D14 | 2x4GB Corsair DDR3-1600 | ASUS HD6950 DirectCU II 2GB | OCZ Vertex 2 120GB | 2x WD Green 1TB


Last edited by frostedflakes on Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Posts: 2978
Location: Sweden
Schlotkins wrote:
So the TDP on this would be in the 35 watt range? It would be similar to the 3800 runing at 1.1v that some people are doing now right?
Chris
Maybe even lower, since there are Opteron 170's running at 1.3 V (standard version, not EE or HE) and got a 35 W TDP.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:12 am
Posts: 206
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Mats wrote:
Schlotkins wrote:
So the TDP on this would be in the 35 watt range? It would be similar to the 3800 runing at 1.1v that some people are doing now right?
Chris
Maybe even lower, since there are Opteron 170's running at 1.3 V (standard version, not EE or HE) and got a 35 W TDP.

Also, it is likely that these Turion dualcore CPUs are rev F based. If so, they will, as I understand it, be manufactured on the new SiGe process. Not only should that bring down power further, but rev F cores are supposedly (process aside) more power optimized than their predecessors.

Nothing's for certain, but we'll know soon enough. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 278
Mats wrote:
Schlotkins wrote:
So the TDP on this would be in the 35 watt range? It would be similar to the 3800 runing at 1.1v that some people are doing now right?
Chris
Maybe even lower, since there are Opteron 170's running at 1.3 V (standard version, not EE or HE) and got a 35 W TDP.


Really?! Could you post a link?

Thanks,
Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Posts: 2978
Location: Sweden
I was wrong, it was a 175 (2.2 GHz) running at 1.35 V and hava a TDP = 35 W.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: wow
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 278
I'd love to have one of those chips! I wonder if they are all like that or if it's only some.

Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: wow
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Posts: 2978
Location: Sweden
Schlotkins wrote:
I'd love to have one of those chips! I wonder if they are all like that or if it's only some.

Chris

Only some of them have that low TDP, most of them are like 60 W or so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: wow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 4:39 am 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 11:25 am
Posts: 260
Mats wrote:
Only some of them have that low TDP, most of them are like 60 W or so.


Grrrr. Why can't they make things more simple so that every range of chips has the same characteristics and you don't have to hunt around for the chip you want. :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: wow
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 8:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 6:54 am
Posts: 2978
Location: Sweden
Mariner wrote:
Mats wrote:
Only some of them have that low TDP, most of them are like 60 W or so.


Grrrr. Why can't they make things more simple so that every range of chips has the same characteristics and you don't have to hunt around for the chip you want. :evil:

Well I guess you'll like the F revision then.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group