It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:22 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Celeron 1007u: mobile IVB alternative to the Celeron 847
PostPosted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 9:36 am 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:50 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Celeron 1007u
http://ark.intel.com/products/72061/
2 Cores @ 1.5 GHz, 17w TDP, no HT

I do not (and likely will not) own one, but those looking at the Celeron 847 boards might be interested.

The Gigabyte GA-C1007UN-D is readily available in the US:
http://www.gigabyte.com/products/produc ... id=4497#ov

At a glance, the GA-C1007UN-D is identical to Gigabyte's 847-based GA-C847N-D (except for the CPU)

Newegg, for reasons unknown, catalogs the GA-C1007UN-D under "Intel Motherboards" instead of "Motherboard / CPU / VGA Combo" with the GA-C847N-D.

The 1007u board *is* more expensive than the 847 boards, especially when the 847's are frequently on sale. All of these mobile Celeron boards confuse me - why no DC-in? They're perfect candidates.

[edited - wording errors and wrong URL]

_________________
it's the only jib I got, baby


Last edited by Jay_S on Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Celeron 1007u: mobile IVB alternative to the Celeron 847
PostPosted: Wed Jun 12, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 6:13 pm
Posts: 144
Jay_S wrote:
Celeron 1007u
http://ark.intel.com/products/72061/
2 Cores x 2 Threads @ 1.5 GHz, 17w TDP.
That makes it sound like it's 4 threads in total, but those don't support HT so it's really 1 thread per core (2 in total).
Quote:
The 1007u board *is* more expensive than the 847 boards, especially when the 847's are frequently on sale
Sounds like a better alternative indeed, at least with current newegg prices for the 10$ difference you get about a 45% performance increase (not just cpu but graphics too). Your newegg link for the 847 is wrong though here's the correct one: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 6813128585
Should make Kabini's life harder when it will finally appear :-)
FWIW there's also 1037U and 1017U Celerons (1.8Ghz and 1.6Ghz otherwise the same) but I'm not sure they are available somewhere, and more important what intel charges for them. Yes they all have the same list price but I really wonder what intel actually charges for them (that 847 has a list price twice as high for just the cpu than what newegg charges for the whole gigabyte board...).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Celeron 1007u: mobile IVB alternative to the Celeron 847
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 7:44 am 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:50 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Milwaukee, WI
mczak wrote:
Jay_S wrote:
2 Cores x 2 Threads @ 1.5 GHz, 17w TDP.

That makes it sound like it's 4 threads in total, but those don't support HT so it's really 1 thread per core (2 in total).

You're right, poor wording on my part.

Quote:
Your newegg link for the 847 is wrong though ...

Ack - errors all over the place! First post updated. Thanks.

_________________
it's the only jib I got, baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Celeron 1007u: mobile IVB alternative to the Celeron 847
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 8:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 3:58 am
Posts: 757
Location: Formosa
Jay_S wrote:
The 1007u board *is* more expensive than the 847 boards, especially when the 847's are frequently on sale. All of these mobile Celeron boards confuse me - why no DC-in? They're perfect candidates.

[edited - wording errors and wrong URL]

For DIY market, it's more difficult or expensive to find a quality DC unit like Pico. Instead, ATX PSU availability is a lot better, pricing is more affordable for DIYers. Just my 2 cents.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Celeron 1007u: mobile IVB alternative to the Celeron 847
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:50 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Milwaukee, WI
loimlo wrote:
Jay_S wrote:
All of these mobile Celeron boards confuse me - why no DC-in? They're perfect candidates.

For DIY market, it's more difficult or expensive to find a quality DC unit like Pico. Instead, ATX PSU availability is a lot better, pricing is more affordable for DIYers. Just my 2 cents.

We may be talking about two different things... I think you are contrasting regular PSUs with the Pico PSU, both of which still require the appropriate jacks on a motherboard.

Instead, I would like to see these ULV mobile celeron boards come with DC-in jacks instead of the standard 20/24-pin ATX and 4/8-pin CPU motherboard jacks. Similar to Intel's thin ITX boards (Intel's DH61AG, for example). If only to reduce cable "spaghetti" in tiny chassis.

_________________
it's the only jib I got, baby


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group