It is currently Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:19 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:04 am
Posts: 272
One year passed and nobody's talking about owning and tweaking them...

My G3220 has been running at 0.800V at 3GHz without any CPU-caused errors since day one, workload including overnight x264 and overnight gaming, surely that is worth something.

0.8 because that is the minimum my motherboard allows. Has anybody gone 3GHz and higher at lower voltages?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 10:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 am
Posts: 1728
Location: Switzerland
wwenze wrote:
surely that is worth something

Not necessarily. Have you measured the effect?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 8:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:04 am
Posts: 272
HFat wrote:
wwenze wrote:
surely that is worth something

Not necessarily. Have you measured the effect?


In terms of? At this stage in technological development it is mostly enthusiasm that creates market for over price and minimal power saving.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 3:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 am
Posts: 1728
Location: Switzerland
Whatever you like. Do you actually save a significant amount of power for instance?
What actually happens with the CPU voltage isn't as simple or transparent as it used to be...

And for what it's worth, I disagree with your assessment of the market.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 7:17 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4602
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
There's not a lot of data out there on Haswell undervolting and motherboard mfgrs don't bother to state whether or not their UEFI will allow for negative core voltage offsets. The few data points I've seen show it's fairly easy to get -0.1V at stock speeds (Roughly .98V vs 1.08V) and YMMV vary lower than that. Hardwareluxx got to 0.9V on a i7-4770K sample unit.

The 0.1V drop is ~18% power savings. So, if your particular CPU uses 70W or so running Handbrake, undervolting to 0.1V drops it to ~58W. Not a lot on the power bill, but it does provide significant thermal benefit making silent CPU cooling an easier chore.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 8:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 am
Posts: 1728
Location: Switzerland
It's not that simple anymore (for one thing, the autonomous voltage management may disregard your settings). Measurements are required to assess any actual power savings.
And no task will ever cause that CPU to burn 70W. Likely not even half unless you torture-test the GPU. Obviously there's more potential for gains with quad-cores.

(edit: I recalled wrong. SPCR didn't undervolt or underclock a dual-core in that test.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 9:43 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4602
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
HFat wrote:
It's not that simple anymore (for one thing, the autonomous voltage management may disregard your settings). Measurements are required to assess any actual power savings.
And no task will ever cause that CPU to burn 70W. Likely not even half unless you torture-test the GPU. Obviously there's more potential for gains with quad-cores.

(edit: I recalled wrong. SPCR didn't undervolt or underclock a dual-core in that test.)


I refer to quad core Haswell, like the one referred to in my post. 84W TDP can see 70W with high load application. Second, Voltage Offset Mode in UEFI specifically refers to offsetting the core voltage at load and works in hand with dynamically changing load voltage.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:04 am
Posts: 272
My asrock has voltage override alongside voltage offset. If using override according to cpuz (and bios) it stays at that 0.8V regardless of frequency.

I would reckon while VR is integrated much of the control would still remain external, otherwise overclockers would either have a high chance of destroying the CPU via auto voltage increments or the platform would be terrible for over clocking with auto voltage limits.

And going 0.785V using a combination of 0.8V override plus -0.015 offset causes freeze up after sone duration of stress. 0.775 bsods at logon screen iirc. So I was already near the limits.

Disregard voltage control, at near threshold voltages the common electrical relationships aren't reliable anymore either. Not that they have been since leakage came into the equation circa 2002.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2014 6:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:04 am
Posts: 272
Dug out my power meter, measured values are from wall

System is Antec TP-550 (Bronze) and GTX 460 (hence the high idle power)

Prime 95 Large FFT
1.0V (stock) @ 3GHz: ~78W
0.8V @ 3GHz: ~68W

Idle
0.8V @ 800MHz (same value whether undervolting or not): ~52.5W

Worth it? Yea my stock heatsink seems to think so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 am
Posts: 1728
Location: Switzerland
wwenze wrote:
Prime 95 Large FFT
1.0V (stock) @ 3GHz: ~78W
0.8V @ 3GHz: ~68W

Idle
0.8V @ 800MHz (same value whether undervolting or not): ~52.5W

Worth it? Yea my stock heatsink seems to think so.

Only worth it if you crunch a lot of numbers and basically useless when idling. That's generally been people's experience with undervolting modern Intel CPU but it's the first time I see Haswell measurements. If you wanted to do a lot of number crunching, would you use that CPU though? That's part of why I think it's a waste of time on dual-cores.
What I have yet to see is serious stability testing. My own stability testing with older CPUs when undervolting mattered enough that I cared strongly suggested that the testing procedures suggested on consumer forums are inadequate.

It makes sense the CPU would automatically set the voltage low when idling anyway but did you try to use no other voltage control than underclocking and the offset? If offsetting doesn't make a significant difference while crunching numbers at 800 Mhz, it would suggest the CPU may ignore the offset not only in turbo mode or when overclocking but also when it underclocks itself autonomously.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 9:09 am
Posts: 1851
Location: Northern California.
exactly. the only real savings is when you run the cpu full on 24-7. -and if you are doing that kind of work, you probably require a truly stable and reliable system. I don't see any real world benefits in undervolting anymore.

_________________
“USA is not America, America is a continent!”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:24 am
Posts: 34
Useful or not, I can say that the Asus Z97I supports undervolting, without a lower limit as far as I can tell. There is auto, manual, adaptive and offset mode.

It is more complicated since both the CPU and stuff on the motherboards adjust voltages automatically. Hard to predict how these things will affect each other...
Even so - with all power saving features enabled my "Haswell Refresh" CPU (4690K) does run 3-4°C cooler if I set a negative offset of 80 mV.

After stress-testing all cores for at least 30 minutes:
* Stock settings, all cores at 3.9 GHz (turbo mode) - max 67°C.
* Limit cores to 3.5 GHz (makes fans much quieter!) - max 61°C.
* Limit cores to 3.5 GHz + 80mV negative offset - max 57°C.
Limiting cores to 3.5 GHz + 100mV negative offset causes kernel panic within minutes.

Seems to me like undervolting is still working just like with Core 2 Duo...?


Last edited by gaidal on Sun Aug 24, 2014 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Sat Aug 23, 2014 10:12 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4602
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Thanks for the data.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:51 pm
Posts: 54
Location: USA
I'm coming from AMD Phenom II territory, where undervolting during idle made a big difference. I've moved to Haswell G3258, and it's been a whole 'nother world for me to learn.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but with the C3/C6/C7 C-states, there is no point anymore in enabling dynamic frequency, C1E, or EIST? I just set it to be pegged at my desired voltage and frequency, and let C6/C7 do its job?

And I still haven't figured out what the difference is between Core C-state and Package C-state.

If anyone has a link to a guide explaining all of this, that would be awesome. My interest over the years has been getting the best of both worlds between overclocking and undervolting by dynamically undervolting/underclocking the chip at idle. So I can get better performance from the overclock at load, and energy savings at idle from the undervolt/underclock. Seems all the rules have changed though from the AMD land I'm coming from.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2014 7:24 am
Posts: 34
davidh44 wrote:
If anyone has a link to a guide explaining all of this, that would be awesome.
I don't think there's ever been a lot of info on undervolting, and it's even less with Haswell. If you find such a guide, please share it here.

davidh44 wrote:
My interest over the years has been getting the best of both worlds between overclocking and undervolting by dynamically undervolting/underclocking the chip at idle. So I can get better performance from the overclock at load, and energy savings at idle from the undervolt/underclock.
Trying to save energy in idle doesn't make much sense to me as the CPU handles that very well with the technologies you mention. For me it's much more interesting to shave off a few degrees at peak performance, where cooling matters most.

Also you can now (?) undervolt using offset mode, which I believe reduces voltage across all states. See my last post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why the lack of talk on Haswell undervolting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 11:03 am
Posts: 1132
Location: Europe
davidh44 wrote:
And I still haven't figured out what the difference is between Core C-state and Package C-state.

If anyone has a link to a guide explaining all of this, that would be awesome.


Not exactly a guide but this Wikipedia article might be useful, especially if you follow the links/references at the bottom of the page.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group