Its not extremly bad for ME so dont improve it at all for anyone who might be happy for an improvment.
Well, your poll did ask whether "I
want a change in the signature rules" - and I don't. I think considering the circumstances, they're fine. It's not extremely bad for the vast majority of forum members, so why should we change it to suit you
You charge that we don't think about you, or poor people in Africa - but did you think about others?
Shorter signatures invariably mean less bytes to download. You're in Sweden, so on the balance of probabilities you probably have a broadband internet connection. There are SPCR members who browse through dial-up. (Of course, with the table-hell HTML design the impact is minimal - but did
Shorter signatures invariably mean less visual clutter, which others may prefer.
Changing the way bbCodes are counted is not a trivial matter and would take admins' time away from writing reviews. This is probably the most important factor, and from seeing the changes being done to SPCR over a few years, I have to say it's probably the
As an engineer at heart, I agree with you - the technology is here, so why should be limit ourselves? I'm working on a project that's pulling out all the plugs because we can, and it's fun to say the least. But in this case, there are good reasons to limit ourselves.