VanWaGuy wrote:
but I think that beyond that you are trying to make a casual conversation method too regimented. People are not owed answers, though the forum will certainly be perceived as friendly the more messages that are replied to.
I do not want to wait for days to post when I could post a partial answer quickly, and even say that there are others here that will probably add more details later. In case the person is in a hurry, or checks back soon, I think this can be a small help.
Hm. I understand your point. I just want to say that that idea was more or less a suggestion. I didn't want to point out something without suggesting an alternative. And I wasn't trying to make a posting rule or anything.

I even like your idea better than mine. Giving any info reguardless of when, will be helpful.
VanWaGuy wrote:
In summary though, I will agree to check the unanswered posts more often.
That's what all I wanted. Thanks!
MikeC wrote:
I have to say, tho, I think the SPCR forum community is very responsive in general.
Yes, without a doubt. I wasn't saying that they're not or that this is a big serious issue. I saw this as a way to improve the forums with only a bit of energy.
I just thought that by trying to answer more unanswered posts we could make SPCR
even better. Sorry if I came off too harsh.
And sorry for the late response.