Where to buy a Seasonic S12-500?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
Where to buy a Seasonic S12-500?
I looked at the review for it here and it's just amazing. However, it's not at the usual places I go to, and I have little knowledge of reputable dealers on the internet. >.<
-
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: TN, USA
The S12-500 is a discontinued model. Soon to be replaced by the S12II-500.
Even then if you liked the S12 you should probably look at the Corsair VX450W or Corsair HX520W instead as they are both less expensive and better quality than the original S12-500.
And if you didn't know already Seasonic makes those PSUs and Corsair puts their name on it.
Even then if you liked the S12 you should probably look at the Corsair VX450W or Corsair HX520W instead as they are both less expensive and better quality than the original S12-500.
And if you didn't know already Seasonic makes those PSUs and Corsair puts their name on it.
-
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: TN, USA
Code: Select all
Model Output (W) 40 65 90 150 200 250 300 400
Efficiency
Seasonic S12-500 .?% 75.1% 78.0% 81.2% 82.0% 81.8% 81.1% 79.0%
Corsair VX450W 72.8% 79.1% 80.1% 82.6% 84.8% 83.3% 83.0% 81.8%
Corsair HX520W 67.7% 72.5% 77.1% 81.0% 84.5% 85.2% 85.1% 83.7%
Seasonic S12-550E+ 68.8% 74.7% 78.6% 81.9% 84.8% 84.3% 84.1% 82.9%
Corsair HX620W 64.9% 70.0% 76.1% 79.9% 83.6% 84.5% 84.7% 83.9%
Seasonic M12-700 65.1% 71.7% 76.7% 80.3% 83.5% 83.8% 83.6% 82.8%
Noise (dBA@1m)
S12-500 21 21 21 22 25 28 34 39
VX450W 21 21 21 21 21 22 26 35
HX520W 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 29
S12-550E+ 20 20 20 20 20 21 25 38
HX620W 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 29
M12-700 21 24 21 21 21 21 25 35
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:10 pm
- Location: Toronto - Ontario - Canada
-
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:20 am
- Location: TN, USA
You need to look at the bottom of that page, specifically:I.S.T. wrote:Here: http://www.silentpcreview.com/article247-page4.html
The numbers in my table are straight from the corrected numbers in that pagePOSTCRIPT: Efficiency Correction
October 22, 2005
Recently, we discovered that our power supply testing equipment and methodology were providing erroneously high efficiency results. In general, the biggest errors occurred at higher output load points above 300W. At lower output levels, the efficiency error was often no more than one or two percentage points. No other tested parameters were significantly affected.
Through a fairly arduous process of discovery, analysis and old fashioned problem solving, we modified our testing equipment and methodology to improve the accuracy of the efficiency results and described it all in the article SPCR's PSU Test Platform V.3. As part of this revision, we re-tested most of the power supplies on our Recommended PSU List. In most cases, the same sample was used in the second test.
The corrected and original efficiency results for all the re-tested PSUs are shown in in the article, Corrected Efficiency Results for Recommended Power Supplies. The relative efficiency of the tested power supplies has not changed. If the tested PSUs are ranked by efficiency, the rankings remain the same whether we use the original results or the new results.
This data is also being added to relevant reviews as postscripts like this one.
In this case, our original efficiency calculations were 2~5% too high through to about 200W output. Above that, the the error kept increasing with rising output power till it reached 8 percentage points off at 400W load. The new figures show that these models are still very high efficiency, but never reach past 82%, which is in line with Seasonic's own specifications.
Code: Select all
Model Output (W) 40 65 90 150 200 250 300 400
Efficiency
Seasonic S12-500 .?% 75.1% 78.0% 81.2% 82.0% 81.8% 81.1% 79.0%