PicoPSU 120W sufficient for server use?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee, Devonavar
PicoPSU 120W sufficient for server use?
Hi,
I'm a LONG time SPCR reader, although my post count probably doesn't reflect that
I'm looking to build a quiet server to replace the Infrant ReadyNAS NV+ I just sent back. What a piece of crap. But that's beside the point. I just want a fast file server that can encode 1080p video every once in awhile. Here are the components I plan on using:
- Core 2 Duo @ 2.13 GHz
- Intel-branded G33 chipset motherboard
- TWO 1 GB sticks of RAM
- FOUR 500GB Samsung hard drives to be run in RAID5
- Integrated Intel gigabit ethernet
Do you guys think there's any chance that a PicoPSU could power this system? The G33 chipset has integrated video which I will use sparingly considering it will be sitting in the corner most of the time.
I'm very open to undervolting options if you guys know of any. I need to use the above components, and I'd like to get away with a PicoPSU if possible.
I'm a LONG time SPCR reader, although my post count probably doesn't reflect that
I'm looking to build a quiet server to replace the Infrant ReadyNAS NV+ I just sent back. What a piece of crap. But that's beside the point. I just want a fast file server that can encode 1080p video every once in awhile. Here are the components I plan on using:
- Core 2 Duo @ 2.13 GHz
- Intel-branded G33 chipset motherboard
- TWO 1 GB sticks of RAM
- FOUR 500GB Samsung hard drives to be run in RAID5
- Integrated Intel gigabit ethernet
Do you guys think there's any chance that a PicoPSU could power this system? The G33 chipset has integrated video which I will use sparingly considering it will be sitting in the corner most of the time.
I'm very open to undervolting options if you guys know of any. I need to use the above components, and I'd like to get away with a PicoPSU if possible.
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:08 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow....
It'd have to be in there with a chance. The Intel chipset is fairly heavy on power at idle, but with C2D doesn't peak very high under load. I'd estimate the idle usage at the power supply output at 9W per hard disk plus 35W for the rest - making about 70W. Then C2D idle/full load differential is 20 to 30W, giving a peak around 100W out of the supply. I think hard disk start-up current is fairly well contained these days, so shouldn't represent too much of a surge.
If you don't really need zero downtime on single hard disk failure, you could get a bit more headroom by going back to 3 disks and RAID-0.
If you don't really need zero downtime on single hard disk failure, you could get a bit more headroom by going back to 3 disks and RAID-0.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 5316
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 2:19 pm
- Location: St Louis (county) Missouri USA
I'd guess it would probably work ok as long as the 12V power supply was at least 120W. You could always step up to the 200W model converter and use something like I am....a 180W power supply from Radio Shack. From what I gather, all these PICOs just pass the 12V line into the system, meaning a 3.5" drive is running directly off the 12V input, not the PICO.
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 3:31 pm
- Location: Munich, Bavaria, Europe
FWIW, I was playing around with a power meter recently, measuring all my stuff. anyways, since I have external hard drive, I can easily measure hard drive power draw.
figures are as follow:
-startup: 35W
-idle: 10W
-seek: 12W.
This a an USB enclosure with a 500GB Samsung HD501LJ inside of it, which is a fairly cool and quiet (therefore maybe low power draw??) hard drive.
Anyways, probably a few watts are lost in conversion, but I dont think it's too much. I don't have the meter right now, but I could for maximum accuracy test by hotswapping with the internal sata connectors, since I can account for the efficiency of my NeoHE.
figures are as follow:
-startup: 35W
-idle: 10W
-seek: 12W.
This a an USB enclosure with a 500GB Samsung HD501LJ inside of it, which is a fairly cool and quiet (therefore maybe low power draw??) hard drive.
Anyways, probably a few watts are lost in conversion, but I dont think it's too much. I don't have the meter right now, but I could for maximum accuracy test by hotswapping with the internal sata connectors, since I can account for the efficiency of my NeoHE.
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 5316
- Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 2:19 pm
- Location: St Louis (county) Missouri USA
The 180W 13.7V power supply from Radio Shack works very well.....but it has a fan. However, the fan only turns on if the thing ever gets too hot. I've never heard the fan in either unit I have, even running in the summer. The 120W Pico will not start much over 13.8v.....the 200W version will start with higher voltage. So check the actual voltage of the power supply before you buy it. Some of these things have an internal voltage adjustment, The RS unit does not.
i'm looking for a powerful 12V ac/dc for the PW-200-V too
i'm looking for a powerful 12V ac/dc for the PW-200-V too
can you get one of these in your country?
I agree. I happend to measure current for 320GB and 200GB HDDs( seagate/Maxtor) and both were in the above range. Maxtor being 3-5watts less during startup.klankymen wrote:FWIW, I was playing around with a power meter recently, measuring all my stuff. anyways, since I have external hard drive, I can easily measure hard drive power draw.
figures are as follow:
-startup: 35W
-idle: 10W
-seek: 12W.
This a an USB enclosure with a 500GB Samsung HD501LJ inside of it, which is a fairly cool and quiet (therefore maybe low power draw??) hard drive.
Anyways, probably a few watts are lost in conversion, but I dont think it's too much. I don't have the meter right now, but I could for maximum accuracy test by hotswapping with the internal sata connectors, since I can account for the efficiency of my NeoHE.
So, pico psu with 120watts, noway it can startup that setup. May be you can buy those HDD powersupplies $6/each with shipping from ebay, and standard 120watts to go with it to power system alone.
Or you could use PW-200 200watts DC-DC supply, may be with this gateway 180 watts brick probably made by delta
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... 0128254174
-
- *Lifetime Patron*
- Posts: 1809
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:45 am
- Location: At Home
It might just power it under load but startup may very well be problematic. Kinda ironic!
I measured a Core 2 Duo 2GHz as consuming 111W A/C under load (dual Prime95) and that was using a P965 chipset and a NVidia 7300GS 256MB.
Assuming power supply efficiency of 80% that translates to a DC load of ~89W. You can deduct ~5W when using an IGP which gives you a figure of 84W. This was with one 400GB Samsung and 2GB RAM. Deducting the 84W from the Pico’s 120W gives you a spare 36W for your three drives which is achievable.
The Pico I believe is rated for a constant load of 120W but may well be able to safely deliver a peak load of more than that for the brief time needed for your drives to startup. According to the SPCR review it’s rated for a Peak combined load of 140W.
If not, you can always buy two of them and share the load; they’re certainly small enough. That also makes it easier to source silent power bricks as it’s easier to find two silent 80W models than one silent 120W+ model.
Note that you want to find a motherboard that doesn’t slightly over-volt as that can add 10W to the system consumption. The figures I gave above were obtained by undervolting using RMClock and weren’t particularly aggressive settings.
If you want to lower the power consumption I suggest using a 945G based chipset board but you’ll lose the native RAID 5 support, so unless you’re using a RAID card this obviously isn’t a solution for you. Data here: viewtopic.php?t=33420&highlight=
I measured a Core 2 Duo 2GHz as consuming 111W A/C under load (dual Prime95) and that was using a P965 chipset and a NVidia 7300GS 256MB.
Assuming power supply efficiency of 80% that translates to a DC load of ~89W. You can deduct ~5W when using an IGP which gives you a figure of 84W. This was with one 400GB Samsung and 2GB RAM. Deducting the 84W from the Pico’s 120W gives you a spare 36W for your three drives which is achievable.
The Pico I believe is rated for a constant load of 120W but may well be able to safely deliver a peak load of more than that for the brief time needed for your drives to startup. According to the SPCR review it’s rated for a Peak combined load of 140W.
If not, you can always buy two of them and share the load; they’re certainly small enough. That also makes it easier to source silent power bricks as it’s easier to find two silent 80W models than one silent 120W+ model.
Note that you want to find a motherboard that doesn’t slightly over-volt as that can add 10W to the system consumption. The figures I gave above were obtained by undervolting using RMClock and weren’t particularly aggressive settings.
If you want to lower the power consumption I suggest using a 945G based chipset board but you’ll lose the native RAID 5 support, so unless you’re using a RAID card this obviously isn’t a solution for you. Data here: viewtopic.php?t=33420&highlight=