160GB 7200.7 - a quiet drive or not?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 8:39 am
160GB 7200.7 - a quiet drive or not?
Well after a few false starts the pc I'm building for my living room is getting ever quieter - 7V panaflows, a thermalright SK7 and a passive cooler for the graphics card have all done thier jobs - a godawful PWM 4 fan bay has not (fans buzz like mad unlike the 7V mod).
Now the problem is the HD sounds like a hoover! I'm considering the 160GB 7200.7 for the system as its going to be filled with music and films, but how quiet is it? I can't find the 'smart drive' case in the UK only the inferior 'silent drive' so this isn't an option (duties + delivery from overseas make these dearer than the hard drive!).
Any ideas welcome but especially those from anyone who's experienced this drive first hand
Regards
BP
Now the problem is the HD sounds like a hoover! I'm considering the 160GB 7200.7 for the system as its going to be filled with music and films, but how quiet is it? I can't find the 'smart drive' case in the UK only the inferior 'silent drive' so this isn't an option (duties + delivery from overseas make these dearer than the hard drive!).
Any ideas welcome but especially those from anyone who's experienced this drive first hand
Regards
BP
See Dru's Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 HDD Review in the Storage section of the main site.
The extra platter in the 160GB will add a (little) bit of noise, as all double-platter drives are noisier than single-platter.
The extra platter in the 160GB will add a (little) bit of noise, as all double-platter drives are noisier than single-platter.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 8:39 am
Thanks for that, I'm nearly convinced but I'd love to hear one before commiting - I really want the 160GB Samsung but here in the UK its apparently unobtainable (?) Seagate IV's can be had but they are way too small for my needs and the last thing I want is a case full of 40/80GB's humming away:(
Regards
BP
Regards
BP
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 10:46 am
You can get the 160gb samsung for £105 from www.savastore.co.uk in the UK
Im in the same dilemma as you ( i think)
Samsung drive, cheaper than seagate and slower, and not serial ata with cool cables. But cheaper and quieter (but by how much?)
Seagate drive - more expensive, but much faster and full of serial ata goodness. But louder?
Hmm, its a hard decision.
Im in the same dilemma as you ( i think)
Samsung drive, cheaper than seagate and slower, and not serial ata with cool cables. But cheaper and quieter (but by how much?)
Seagate drive - more expensive, but much faster and full of serial ata goodness. But louder?
Hmm, its a hard decision.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 8:39 am
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
- Location: Columbus, OH USA
Thinking about getting the samsung, but it seems there aren't many of those quieter 80G/platter as 120G versions, so might have to go with 160G version. What I'm wondering is that is it possible to get the full use of that space with windows 98SE? Read somewhere about this 137G limit (24bit LBA), that could be exceeded with certain SPs in win2000 and XP, but there was no mention of 98. Has anyone tried 98 with big drives? Also, I have epox 8kha+ mobo, does anyone know if it's bios supports 48bit LBA? couldn't find anything with google, and epox site only has release notes for the last bios update.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 8:39 am
Hi,
in theory the maximum size of hard drive if you are using FAT32 is 2 Terabytes. In XP you need service pack 1 and my Soltek board needed a bios update (you may need to email epox). Not sure about Win 98 although it did have an LBA service pack once upon a time, but it might have been to support smaller drives than the Samsung?
I have read of some problems with older windows versions though:
"problems above 64 Gig: with a cluster size of 32k. Many programs under Windows 95 and 98 cannot access more than 2.1 million clusters on a drive."
Maybe time to upgrade to XP? No more blue screens (!) and mostly stable
Regards
BP
in theory the maximum size of hard drive if you are using FAT32 is 2 Terabytes. In XP you need service pack 1 and my Soltek board needed a bios update (you may need to email epox). Not sure about Win 98 although it did have an LBA service pack once upon a time, but it might have been to support smaller drives than the Samsung?
I have read of some problems with older windows versions though:
"problems above 64 Gig: with a cluster size of 32k. Many programs under Windows 95 and 98 cannot access more than 2.1 million clusters on a drive."
Maybe time to upgrade to XP? No more blue screens (!) and mostly stable
Regards
BP
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 8:39 am
The limit for 28-bit LBA is 127 GB (as Windows will show it), or 137 GB (as HD manufacturers present it). So, the biggest drive for XP without any SPs is 120 GB, any bigger (next size is 160 GB) and You'll end up having only 127 GB.Spoonfed wrote:What does XP recongnise no Service pack (which is what i run)
Recognoises 120gb NTFS no probs
Cheers,
Jan
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 11:09 am
-
- Friend of SPCR
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 6:54 pm
- Location: Tacoma, WA