swiss cheese my sink?
Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee
swiss cheese my sink?
Why is it that anything I get my hands on, I have to modify it?
Ok back to my post. I've been wondering about modifying my heatsink, sk7, by drilling a bunch of small holes through it (except no holes in the area that touches the CPU). My reasoning is it will increase the surface area of the sink. Maybe its not a good idea because it will reduce the mass.
So whats more important increasing surface area or mass? and is it a bad idea?
Ok back to my post. I've been wondering about modifying my heatsink, sk7, by drilling a bunch of small holes through it (except no holes in the area that touches the CPU). My reasoning is it will increase the surface area of the sink. Maybe its not a good idea because it will reduce the mass.
So whats more important increasing surface area or mass? and is it a bad idea?
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2003 2:15 pm
- Location: UK
Funny, I was thinking about that the other day. Not sure about mass vs surface area.
I worked out that to increase the surface area the diameter of the hole would have to be less than the thickness of the material times two:
d < 2 * t
IIRC the material of the SK7 is quite thin so that would mean quite small holes.
Hope this is helpful somehow!
I worked out that to increase the surface area the diameter of the hole would have to be less than the thickness of the material times two:
d < 2 * t
IIRC the material of the SK7 is quite thin so that would mean quite small holes.
Hope this is helpful somehow!
I'd be drilling 3/32" holes thru the 1/4" thick base . well under your size constraints per your formula and not very tiny (a 3/32" drill bit doesnt flex too much). drilling thru copper shouldn't be too bad.
I would have to drill about 20 holes to get a 25% increase of surface area. Wish I knew how much temp decrease would occur with increase in surface area then I'd know if it was worth the effort.
I've got a mile long to do list and I'm thinking about this - and on a saturday no less. I'm sick for sure :(
I would have to drill about 20 holes to get a 25% increase of surface area. Wish I knew how much temp decrease would occur with increase in surface area then I'd know if it was worth the effort.
I've got a mile long to do list and I'm thinking about this - and on a saturday no less. I'm sick for sure :(
[quote="Bean"]I would have to drill about 20 holes to get a 25% increase of surface area. quote]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooops. thats not right - I was only considering the base and not the surface area of all the fins which makes the surface area of the holes negligible. The only merit to this idea is ........is.....??
I was just thinking the extra air flowing in the holes of the base was beneficial somehow and mistakingly tried to justify the idea by the increase in surface area.
I guess the base acts as a sink and just like holes in a sink dont hold water, holes in a heatsink don't hold heat.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Ooops. thats not right - I was only considering the base and not the surface area of all the fins which makes the surface area of the holes negligible. The only merit to this idea is ........is.....??
I was just thinking the extra air flowing in the holes of the base was beneficial somehow and mistakingly tried to justify the idea by the increase in surface area.
I guess the base acts as a sink and just like holes in a sink dont hold water, holes in a heatsink don't hold heat.
So you want MORE noise?
If silence is your goal, drilling holes is sure not going to help. The holes will create turbulence in the airflow that will both create noise and slow down airflow. This will make the fan work harder to move the air and so it too will make more noise.
Additionally, just using a drill bit only to do this will leave sharp edges on the exit side of the holes. These sharp edges will catch the air and disturb the airflow, making still more noise.
To do it right, you'd have to use a deburring tool used by machinists to remove hole burrs and chamfer the edges around EACH drilled hole:
A deburring tool is shown at the end of this webpage:
http://www.parktool.com/repair_help/how ... face.shtml
However, since you are likely drilling through many plates, it would be very hard to stick the deburring tool deep inside the heatsink. What you really need is a metalworking tool that is known as a reamer. It is shoved through the holes in the opposite direction you drilled them.
British site for hand reamers:
http://www.chronos.ltd.uk/acatalog/Chro ... c_115.html
American site for adjustable hand reamers:
http://www.houseoftools.com/product.htm?pid=170086
Here is an in-depth discussion of burrs, with pictures:
Elementary Knowledge of Metailworking
Chapter 1. Basic Machining and Tips - Removal of Burrs
-Scalar
Additionally, just using a drill bit only to do this will leave sharp edges on the exit side of the holes. These sharp edges will catch the air and disturb the airflow, making still more noise.
To do it right, you'd have to use a deburring tool used by machinists to remove hole burrs and chamfer the edges around EACH drilled hole:
A deburring tool is shown at the end of this webpage:
http://www.parktool.com/repair_help/how ... face.shtml
However, since you are likely drilling through many plates, it would be very hard to stick the deburring tool deep inside the heatsink. What you really need is a metalworking tool that is known as a reamer. It is shoved through the holes in the opposite direction you drilled them.
British site for hand reamers:
http://www.chronos.ltd.uk/acatalog/Chro ... c_115.html
American site for adjustable hand reamers:
http://www.houseoftools.com/product.htm?pid=170086
Here is an in-depth discussion of burrs, with pictures:
Elementary Knowledge of Metailworking
Chapter 1. Basic Machining and Tips - Removal of Burrs
-Scalar
-
- Patron of SPCR
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2003 2:38 pm
- Location: California, US
- Contact:
Re: So you want MORE noise?
scalar:
I agree, noise may be an issue but the fan would be low rpm.
disagree on slow down of airflow. If the holes relieve the back pressure caused by air flow that hits the base and has to change direction, I would think thats a good thing. It would do the opposite and increase airflow by decrease the load on the fan.
Burrs, good point. Thanks for the links. they were educational.
-------------------------------
SometimesWarrior:
You're prob right. it does seem to be the classic heatsink design although the designs for low noise heatsinks are not as mature. it may be counterproductive to induce the holes
I agree, noise may be an issue but the fan would be low rpm.
disagree on slow down of airflow. If the holes relieve the back pressure caused by air flow that hits the base and has to change direction, I would think thats a good thing. It would do the opposite and increase airflow by decrease the load on the fan.
Burrs, good point. Thanks for the links. they were educational.
-------------------------------
SometimesWarrior:
You're prob right. it does seem to be the classic heatsink design although the designs for low noise heatsinks are not as mature. it may be counterproductive to induce the holes
High mass does you no good once it has become saturated with heat. You could use a brick to cool the CPU, but once it becomes saturated you'd have to turn the computer off several hours until the brick could slowly cool off.
What you really want is a material with high heat conductivity, where heat moves quickly through the material. Heat capacity is important, but not as important as conductivity. The hype about copper and all-copper is just that -- hype.
The actual engineering knowledge of such details is so vague that I doubt there are many people who really understand what makes a good, efficient heatsink design. The heatsink manufacturers know this, which is why there are so many ridiculous looking heatsinks out there. They're selling on looks and hype, not actual design efficiency. (ooh! blinky blue lights on the fan! A marketing name like "arctic"! it MUST be good!)
-Scalar
What you really want is a material with high heat conductivity, where heat moves quickly through the material. Heat capacity is important, but not as important as conductivity. The hype about copper and all-copper is just that -- hype.
The actual engineering knowledge of such details is so vague that I doubt there are many people who really understand what makes a good, efficient heatsink design. The heatsink manufacturers know this, which is why there are so many ridiculous looking heatsinks out there. They're selling on looks and hype, not actual design efficiency. (ooh! blinky blue lights on the fan! A marketing name like "arctic"! it MUST be good!)
-Scalar
"The only merit to this idea is ........is.....?? "
The ability for slow moving air to flow through that thing. That's the beauty of the slk800 over the sk7 when each have weak airflow - a less restrictive path than the sk7 which just has a wall of metal at the end of the road for the air. Come on give it a try and post back with your temps.
The ability for slow moving air to flow through that thing. That's the beauty of the slk800 over the sk7 when each have weak airflow - a less restrictive path than the sk7 which just has a wall of metal at the end of the road for the air. Come on give it a try and post back with your temps.
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:53 am
wow
remind me not to annoy rusty, he destroyed poor bluefront in that thread lol
um *looks about nervously* nice desk rus!
Seems to me that if you want to increase surface area on an slk 800 type hs, driving channels into the fins would be a better way to go over drilling holes. I don't pretend to understand if this would help or hinder though.
Seems to me that thermalright and zalman could skive (or channel) indididual fins before assembling them instead of them having flat surfaces if the added area helps. Would be much easier to do that sort of work before assembling the heatsink.
Cheers!
-Liq
um *looks about nervously* nice desk rus!
Seems to me that if you want to increase surface area on an slk 800 type hs, driving channels into the fins would be a better way to go over drilling holes. I don't pretend to understand if this would help or hinder though.
Seems to me that thermalright and zalman could skive (or channel) indididual fins before assembling them instead of them having flat surfaces if the added area helps. Would be much easier to do that sort of work before assembling the heatsink.
Cheers!
-Liq