So here is my report after ~6 weeks of actual use in one (actually 2) system:
The system
- AOpen AX4GE Max
- P4-2.8 or P4-1.8 cooled by Thermalright 900 + Panaflo 80mm L @6-8V
- 512M DDRAM
- 2 Barracuda HDD
- nVidia 9800 128M (w/Panaflo 80L @7~8V w/ fanmate1 controller on Zalman bracket) or integrated on-board video
- Yamaha 44X CDRW
- Seasonic 300W PSU/Panaflo M fan mod
- 2 Panaflo 80L case fans - 1 back, 1 front, 5-8V
- 1 Zalman fanmate 1 fan controller
- Optimized airflow modded case/PSU - some damping.
- Windows XP Pro (SP2)
- 24/7 Folding@home.
With 24/7 Folding@home, it is too hot a system for the 2-fan control SilentTek (or SilentnBIOS) to handle. First, there are way too many fans. The fan for the nVidia 9800 VGA is connected to the third mobo fan header and set to a fixed voltage via a Zalman fanmate 1 fan controller. I found I cannot use any of the modes in which the fan modulates on/off or adjust speed with temperature -- even when the on voltage is very low, in my quiet office, the change in noise is easily, annoyingly heard. And with this hot system, the fans go on/off too often.
I found the best SilentTEK mode for this system was the fixed speed mode, set to the lowest. The only trouble there is that the minumum speed is sometimes too high, at ~6.5V for the CPU fan header and about 5.5V for the case fan header. Right now, I am running a splitter to run both the CPU fan and the back panel fan off the CPU mobo fan header. As the Panflos draw so little current, and because the highest I ever set the voltage to is ~8V, there is little danger of burning out the header. The front case fan is running at min (5.5V) on the 2nd SilentTEK controlled fan header.
What are the advantages of SilentTEK for this system as it is current configured?
Basically it saves using a fanmate1 controller on every fan - and there are 4 fans. Instead, I use only 1 fanmate1. The system is the loudest in my stable -- probably 24-25 dBA. Chances are I can't really get it lower without more case customization and/or better noise/airflow ratio fans becasue of the hot CPU and VGA. When the Folding@home is turned off, then it is feasible to use one of the fan-modulated options; I liked the result obtained with the Multiple Level control, although I used only 2 or 3 levels and it took a lot of experimentation to get it to behave exactly the way I wanted.
The worse thing about SilentTEK for me in this system is the cumbersome interface:
- it is easy to accidently close it, causing instant noise havoc
- can't be nicely reduced like MBM into the desktop tray, with shortcuts accessible there.
B. P4-1.8 + integrated VGA: It's a much cooler system, even running Folding@home 24/7. But the amount of heat generated still makes it impractical for me to leave it on any fan-modulated option, the change in noise is too annoying. But I reach the same target temps (or lower) as described above with all the fans set to their lowest via SlientTEK. The overall noise is 3-5 dBA lower than the above, and of course there is one less fan (the one on the NV9800). With Folding@home off, the system works well on any of the fan-modulated options if you choose good options. The integrated VGA is perfectly serviceable, even for photoshop and DTP work, btw.
In conclusion, the self-adjusting SilentTEK features work best when
-the system components are not super hot
-there is good airflow through the system, and around the CPU
Then the CPU fan can be set to trigger only when very hot and thus not ever trigger becasue the good case airflow keeps it under that temp. Yet there is no risk of CPU overheating.
The trick is to set the case fans to constant but quiet speed, which cannot be done by SilentTek if the CPU fan is auto-adjusted. So the best setup would then be fixed low voltage, quiet fan(s) for case airflow, maybe using fanmate1 controllers, a top CPU cooler and the CPU fan temp controlled by SilentTEK. Maximum airflow with minimum noise is still mandatory, but SilentTEK does make it all a bit more fun and "scientific". I am not quite as enthusiastic about it now that I see its limitations more clearly, but there still is nothing better in motherboard embedded temp/noise control.