DDR: 266, 333, 400.. big difference?

Got a shopping cart of parts that you want opinions on? Get advice from members on your planned or existing system (or upgrade).

Moderators: NeilBlanchard, Ralf Hutter, sthayashi, Lawrence Lee

Post Reply
intx
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 12:57 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

DDR: 266, 333, 400.. big difference?

Post by intx » Wed Jul 07, 2004 8:19 pm

I've noticed there are various different speeds in ddr memory. But how much of a performance difference would I notice between them? Do I really need 400mhz memory, or would I only notice a minimal increase like with dual channel memory?

Thanks

Spod
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 475
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:14 am
Location: Leeds, UK

Post by Spod » Thu Jul 08, 2004 3:39 am

Athlon XPs aren't that sensitive to bus speed, but you want to get RAM that matches the FSB you intend to run your processor. If it's a 400 MHz FSB Athlon XP, you need DDR400 memory to match it.

You can run your RAM at a different speed to your FSB, but the latency penalties are relatively significant. If you get a 333 MHz FSB Athlon XP, it's better to run your RAM at 333 MHz (a 1:1 ratio) than to run your RAM at 400 MHz.

Skylined
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Uruguay
Contact:

Post by Skylined » Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:54 am

Only get a higher rated DDR if you're going to overclock.
But as Spod said, always try to match your CPU's FSB.

For example I have a 1700+ that's stock 133MHz FSB, but I'm overclocking it with a FSB of 166MHz, so I bought DDR333 to match that FSB. ;)

Post Reply