It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 6:02 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: External Seagate Drives: A Portable 2.5" and a Pocket
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:00 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 11:23 am
Posts: 1847
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
External Seagate Drives: A Portable 2.5" and a Pocket Drive


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:18 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Umea, Sweden.
That Pocket Hard Drive looks like it could be used for booting up a small file server, perfect!

This is also one of the products which I have seen that has actually been cheaper here in sweden than the suggested retail price "over there"!

MikeC, do you have any experience with installing an OS (like win2k) on a USB drive? Can the windows installer even detect USB-drives?

_________________
| HP NC6220 | Iomega Desktop Storage USB 500GB |


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:32 am
Posts: 46
Location: IL
just bought a 2GB fast DOK. performance is comprable to the reviewed pocket drive.

I don't see the point. why is this such a breakthrough? the only added value is the HW encryption. and that can be done on flash. with 4GB DOK available cheap - no point to go spin drive - silent or not.

my 2c

_________________
Silence is good.
It's keeping quiet that's the problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 1:28 am 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 2:19 pm
Posts: 5316
Location: St Louis (county) Missouri USA
I've had a 5gb version of this pocket-drive for a few months.....nice. As the review states....totally silent unless pressed against your ear. I like the retractable cord a bunch. It's a versitile device, and fast enough for most uses.

_________________
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill disciplined, despotic, and useless. Liberalism is the philosophy of sniveling brats." - P.J. O'Rourke


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 2:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:18 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Umea, Sweden.
forester joe wrote:
just bought a 2GB fast DOK. performance is comprable to the reviewed pocket drive.

I don't see the point. why is this such a breakthrough? the only added value is the HW encryption. and that can be done on flash. with 4GB DOK available cheap - no point to go spin drive - silent or not.

my 2c


First of all, it is a lot cheaper. About 30-50% cheaper than a 4gb flash card with converter. Second, it does not wear out like CF cards that have a limited read/write access.

_________________
| HP NC6220 | Iomega Desktop Storage USB 500GB |


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:20 am 
Offline
Patron of SPCR

Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:07 am
Posts: 2674
Location: Houten, The Netherlands, Europe
Ackelind wrote:
Second, it does not wear out like CF cards that have a limited read/write access.
Really old and cheap flash has 10,000 read/write cycles. As long as you don't put a swap file on it, you won't write more than once a day average on a single sector. So it breaks after 27 years. Ergo: for most applications the "limited" read/write access of flash is not a problem at all.

_________________
3) MSI RS480M2-IL | A64 3000+ | Freezer 64 | SS-301HT | 7200.7 PATA 40GB
5) Intel D525MW | Intel 320 40GB | Vertex II 180GB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:36 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4740
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Still a 1yr warranty on these external drives vs 5yrs for the internal bare drives.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 10:27 am 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Posts: 3998
Location: Phoenix, AZ
CA_Steve wrote:
Still a 1yr warranty on these external drives vs 5yrs for the internal bare drives.


You have to think about the environment. An internal drive rarely takes any physical abuse...it's warranty claims come from internal failures (and maybe overheating). An external drive is getting dropped, squashed, jostled, left in cars in the heat, left out in the cold, and experiences wild swings in ambient temperatures....not recipes for long life.

_________________
Senior Contributing Writer, SPCR


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 10:12 pm
Posts: 274
Location: Sydney, Australia
imo that tiny drive would be PERFECT if its capacity was rougly doubled to about 10gb

_________________
AMD64 3200 w/ Zalman 7700AlCu @ 5v (900rpm)
MSI K8N Neo4 w/ TR HR05-SLI
2048mb Generic DDR400
Sparkle 8800GT w/ AC Accelero S1
SATA Seagate 7200.7 160gb
SATA Samsung HD501LJ 500gb
Corsair VX450w
120mm Aerocool Turbine 2000 @ 9v (800rpm)
80mm Coolermaster @ 5v (1000rpm)
Coolermaster Aerogate3


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 9:13 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4740
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
I amend to something clearer: "still better to put a 5yr warranteed internal drive in your own external enclosure than buy a 1yr external drive from the same mfgr".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:36 pm
Posts: 191
Location: UK
Intersting review. I've had the 5GB pocket drive for a year or so, and in that time have not been able to boot it using syslinux (a good bootloader for emergency purposes) as the drive is formatted in FAT-32, and I was unable to change the partition table to create a smaller partition formatted in FAT-16 Have they changed something so you can do this in the 6GB (and presumably 12GB, which interests me) version?

As a point of interest, mine has survived several drops and is still functioning.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: syslinux now supports FAT-32
PostPosted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:03 pm
Posts: 317
Quote:
not been able to boot it using syslinux (a good bootloader for emergency purposes) as the drive is formatted in FAT-32

As of 3.00, FAT-32 is supported. http://syslinux.zytor.com/history.php

Documentation has been somewhat lacking, but the tool improves steadily. Reliability has increased substantially. I was able to resolve some gnarly DSL boot issues by building my USB pendrive with syslinux 3.11 rather than the DSL-supported 2.04.

My testing was done by borrowing the syslinux 3.11 from Knoppix 5. Of course, you can go for the official version at http://freshmeat.net/projects/syslinux/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: syslinux now supports FAT-32
PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 1:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:36 pm
Posts: 191
Location: UK
dougz wrote:
Quote:
not been able to boot it using syslinux (a good bootloader for emergency purposes) as the drive is formatted in FAT-32

As of 3.00, FAT-32 is supported. http://syslinux.zytor.com/history.php


Really

Just shows how much attention I have paid to it recently. Looks like I'm going to have some fun![/b]


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group