FAQFAQ SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist UsergroupsUsergroups RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in
quietest config for 3TB?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SPCR Forum Index -> Silent Storage
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
lm
Friend of SPCR


Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1073
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:31 am    Post subject: quietest config for 3TB? Reply with quote

Suppose you wanted to build 3TB worth of storage. What would lead to the quietest overall solution? This is completely academic, I'm not going to build such atm, just wondering.

3TB is either:

a) 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 1000GB, 5 platters per drive = 15 platters total

b) 4x Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 750 GB, 4 platters per drive = 16 platters total

c) 6x some quiet 500GB drive, 3 or 4 platters per drive = 18 or 24 platters total

d) other, please specify

SPCR review & recommendations don't really help with this, as they seem to be only targeting users that want just a single drive in their machine, no matter how much data they need to store.
_________________
just 1 computer for all purposes: HP LP3065 30" LCD 2560x1600 pixels, Q9450, 8GB DDR2 ECC 800MHz, WD Velociraptor 300GB, WD 640GB, 8800GTS 512MB, Gigabyte EX38-DS4, Antec P182b, Corsair VX450, Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme, Scythe S-Flex fan, about 110W AC idle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gb115b
*Lifetime Patron*


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 269
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, i'm also interested in how people view it... i have an 8 drive setup at the mo with 2.4 TB in Raid 6

how does the db scale work, is two drives twice as loud? (~3db higher?)

how about people's subjective impressions?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jessekopelman



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 1380
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

gb115b wrote:
how does the db scale work, is two drives twice as loud? (~3db higher?)

People often get confused about this (I didn't understand it properly until recently, myself). You are correct that 3 dB is double; however, what it is double is sound pressure, not loudness. For double loudness, you need a sound pressure change of 10 dB. So, assuming the noise from each drive is perfectly additive (which is not a good assumption), you would need to go to 10 identical drives to double the loudness of one. Still, loudness doesn't need to double for you to notice a change. Three drives would be potentially 5 dB more sound pressure than one and that translates to 41% louder -- I think you'd notice that. Eventually, the issue with using a lot of drives becomes the noise from keeping them cool, not the cumulative noise of the drives themselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jessekopelman



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 1380
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 10:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My vote is for a) 3x Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 1000GB, 5 platters per drive = 15 platters total. While three Deskstars may or may not be quieter than four of some other large capacity drive, I'd be surprised if they were noticeably louder. Meanwhile, three 3.5" drives will always produce less heat than four. So, when you factor in reduced cooling needs, this is the winner.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DryFire



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1075
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have noise + vibration + potential drive failure.

I would not want to run 6 drives without some form of raid (most likely raid 5).

the heating situation can be somewhat alleviated by moving 2 or more of the drives to 5.25" bays with passive hard drive coolers, and if you have a psu with a rear intake you could even do some ducting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IsaacKuo



Joined: 23 Jan 2004
Posts: 1705
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 11:23 am    Post subject: Re: quietest config for 3TB? Reply with quote

lm wrote:
Suppose you wanted to build 3TB worth of storage. What would lead to the quietest overall solution?


It depends on the style of usage, and whether or not it's acceptable to spin down any drives.

Quote:
c) 6x some quiet 500GB drive, 3 or 4 platters per drive = 18 or 24 platters total


If most of the data is video, where only one drive would typically be needed at a time, then this would be the quietest solution. You may need to wait several seconds for a drive to spin up, but that's okay for watching movies.

If most of the data is music, which is accessed more or less randomly, then this isn't a good solution.

Isaac Kuo
_________________
Isaac Kuo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DryFire



Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 1075
Location: USA

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could put at least 1 playlist per hd. 500GB is a lot of music, even if it's FLAC or APE.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gb115b
*Lifetime Patron*


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 269
Location: London

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2007 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks jesse! that makes sense now

so far the cooling for the hds doesn't seem to be an issue - temps are good.

i think noise is definitely (subjectively) more pronounced from the drives...though it could be that difference between the low thrum of fan noise and high pitch of hds is more noticeable...

i guess as my hearing goes the hds will become less noticeable!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jessekopelman



Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 1380
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

gb115b wrote:
so far the cooling for the hds doesn't seem to be an issue - temps are good.

The issue with cooling I was referring to is that it makes noise. You put enough (say 6 or so) drives close together and you've got similar heat to a CPU or PSU and thus need a similarly noisy fan to cool them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sylph-DS



Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 220
Location: The Netherlands

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say three times 1TB in a suspended Quiet Drive (or something alike), and then just put two 92mm low RPM fans (nexus perhaps) in front, run the fans at 7v or something. Doesn't sound half bad to me.

Although I may be off on the thermal properties of the Quiet Drive, haven't really had much experience with those.
_________________
Idiot. Geek. Sylph.
Now, where did I leave my motivation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gb115b
*Lifetime Patron*


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 269
Location: London

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry jesse i am cooling 8HDs with 2 120mm scythe fans (speedfan controlled). when they're at max they do mask the hd noise (though they have different frequencies), but they do ramp down and then the hd noise becomes more audible..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
halcyon
Patron of SPCR


Joined: 26 Mar 2003
Posts: 1094
Location: EU

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not sure if it's shipping, but consider:

Samsung F-series

HD102UJ, SATA300, 1 TB, Samsung claims 3 platters / disk (not confirmed, could be 4 platters as well)

Retails for around 230euros in Germany.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
whiic



Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 526
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Samsung might take a while for availability. I hope it's soon, since not only does it offer an alternative to 7K1000, it will also force down prices of all high-capacity drives, also 750GB.

And I don't expect Seagate's upcoming 7200.11 to be competitive against 7K1000 in performarce nor in silence. It may win some low-leven benchmarks (like STR, seek time) but it doesn't matter to real performance that much, at least in non-server use.

I also have my doubts about Samsung "F1" being 3-platter drive. Not only would that mean 333GB platters but also that "U" in HD102UJ would mean excactly the same as "L": 6 heads. "U" hasn't been around before, so maybe "U" stands for 8 heads. Who knows.

Otherwise the model code seems logical HD-prefix as with T-series, 10 means 1000, 2 means 32MB (1 means 16MB and 0 means 8MB) cache, then is a letter describing the number of heads, and last is interface type.

(P series had the number of head as the last number. For example: SP1603N is P-series Spinpoint (SP), 160GB, 3 heads, ATA. They used three numbers for capacity regardless of capacity adding a 0 to the beginning if required. With T-series, this was reduced down to 2 numbers and one extra number was converted to a letter.)

Regardless of the number of platters, I hope for availability soon... but I'm not holding my breath.

______

CORRECTION: HD103UJ is 32MB variant. HD102UJ is 16MB variant. But with T166 series, HD500LJ was 8MB and HD501LJ was 16MB. Doesn't make much sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lm
Friend of SPCR


Joined: 17 Dec 2003
Posts: 1073
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

halcyon wrote:
I'm not sure if it's shipping, but consider:

Samsung F-series

HD102UJ, SATA300, 1 TB, Samsung claims 3 platters / disk (not confirmed, could be 4 platters as well)

Retails for around 230euros in Germany.


Considering that Seagate has just released a 250GB/platter drive, 334GB/platter from Samsung sounds like they'd made a huge jump ahead of the leader?
_________________
just 1 computer for all purposes: HP LP3065 30" LCD 2560x1600 pixels, Q9450, 8GB DDR2 ECC 800MHz, WD Velociraptor 300GB, WD 640GB, 8800GTS 512MB, Gigabyte EX38-DS4, Antec P182b, Corsair VX450, Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme, Scythe S-Flex fan, about 110W AC idle
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kaleid



Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 211
Location: Sweden

PostPosted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope the Samsung rumours are true, I want two 666GB drives. Smile
_________________
PII 955 3.4Ghz, Gigabyte MA790X-UD3P, Cooler Master v8, 4GB Corsair xms2, Samsung F2 1tb +5900.12 1tb (both in softm quietdrives), X-fi xtreme gamer, Pioneer 216D, Philips 200WP7ES, Zalman 850w (+Silverstone PSU cover), Antec p182 (2x500rpm slipstream)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
whiic



Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 526
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"I hope the Samsung rumours are true, I want two 666GB drives."

Don't take the rumours too seriously. I haven't seen any rumours claiming 666GB variant to become available.

The rumours say:
3x 333GB => 1000GB
3x 250GB => 750GB
...so there probably will be no 2-platter variant.

I you remember seeing it somewhere, I said something like that on SR... as a joke. Because I have my doubts on "3x 333GB" Samsung at this point of time. Adnt that's because:
- HD102UJ ("U" instead of "L") might have some other head count than 6. And anything different from 6 means high likelyhood it's not a 3 platter drive.
- Jump to 333GB is "only" 100% from current Samsungs.
- Jumping ahead all the competition when having done next to no research by themselves. Samsung merely assembles HDDs from part purhased from other companies. (WD makes more but even they aren't innovative. Pretty much all the pantents in the industry belong to Hitachi and Seagate, so they are pretty much driving it, others are merely passengers.)
- 333GB/platter variant and 250GB/platter variant released at the same time? If there was some time between the releases, it'd seem almost believable. Say, 750GB available now and 1000GB remaining vaporware 'til X-mas. Releasing 1000GB at the same time suggests a 4-platter construction.

I know, Samsung haven't been making 4-platter drives. And not too long ago they weren't making anything with more than 2. Reminds me of Seagate that had only 2 platters, until 7200.8 introduces up to 4 platters. The capacity race was started by Hitachi with a jump from 3-platter to 5-platter construction. Soon after that WD added that 4th platter too. Only Samsung was slow to react, with T-series taking a long time to market and still falling one platter short from Seagate and WD and 2 platters short from Hitachi.

I do hope the rumours were true but I have my doubts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
whiic



Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 526
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Since it's "printed" on "paper" (ie. datasheet)
http://ec.ingrammicro.de/pdf/8864948.pdf
It probably is 3-platter. It's funny though that some other corporation than Samsung itself distributes all the information about the drive. And that all corporations that claim these Samsungs available happen to be German. Some people on SR even suggest it's a hoax but it'd have to be an elaborate one as there's multiple German sites affected.

Data to wide scale availability remains a big question. 750GB might hit market sooner.

Some notes from the datasheet:
- SATA only. This means the biggest Samsung with PATA interface will remain 400GB (old T133 series). This is a bugger as we'd like cool and quiet drives in PVRs too, and PVRs don't necessary work with SATA HDDs. (Then again, if you can't decouple it, going for relatively cool 5-platter Hitachi might not be such a bad idea after all.)
- "FOD (Flying on Demand) enhancing Read/Write
performance and product reliability"
might be synonymous to load/unload technology used in all Hitachis and newest AAxx WDs.
- "RAID Edition" in addition to standard edition: higher MTBF (i.e lower infant mortality due to longer factory testing) and "Optional Rotational Vibration Sensor". WTF? Optional?
- Some CE features (streaming) and power saving. I wonder if they are in all HDDs since there's no separate model numbers for CE and Raid Edition. I also wonder if there'd be APM support. Hitachi has it but WD doesn't (even on AAxx).

______

CORRECTION: Flying on Demand is equivalent to Thermal Fly-Height Control of Hitachi drives, not Load/Unload Technology.

How it works is described here (as part of describing features in T133): http://www.samsung.com/Products/HardDiskDrive/news/HardDiskDrive_20060801_0000277170.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Goldmember



Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 220
Location: U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

whiic wrote:
Since it's "printed" on "paper" (ie. datasheet)
http://ec.ingrammicro.de/pdf/8864948.pdf
It probably is 3-platter. It's funny though that some other corporation than Samsung itself distributes all the information about the drive. And that all corporations that claim these Samsungs available happen to be German. Some people on SR even suggest it's a hoax but it'd have to be an elaborate one as there's multiple German sites affected...


Bah, I just read this thread. Rolling Eyes

Anyway it's legit. Ingram Micro is a huge worldwide distributor so they need to have the pdf files available with factual information for potential clients, ie retailers, to pass on to customers. Nothing unusual there. And the drives will probably be released in the EU first. Samsung drives always seem to take their time getting to the US.

Someone please start a Samsung F1 thread.............
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SPCR Forum Index -> Silent Storage All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Search:           
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group