Seagate Pipeline HD Pro 1TB Hard Drive

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Seagate Pipeline HD Pro 1TB Hard Drive

Post by MikeC » Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:34 am

Last edited by MikeC on Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:40 am, edited 1 time in total.

Matija
Posts: 780
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 3:17 am
Location: Croatia

Post by Matija » Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:47 am

"Can hold more porn than you can throw a stick at."


Dunno... People usually don't throw their sticks; they do other things with/to them.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:58 am

"More than you can throw a stick at" is an idiom that usually means "more than expected". "Shake a stick at" is a more common alternate.

PartEleven
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:37 am

Post by PartEleven » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:41 am

MikeC, I think you missed the sexual innuendo there....

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:43 am

PartEleven wrote:MikeC, I think you missed the sexual innuendo there....
Ignored, actually.

antivenom
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:14 pm
Location: UK

Post by antivenom » Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:56 am

HAH! :lol:

FartingBob
Patron of SPCR
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:05 am
Location: London
Contact:

Post by FartingBob » Mon Feb 16, 2009 8:11 am

So, getting to the actual drive.
Very quiet seeks, especially for a 7200rpm. Makes you wonder if seagate ever notice that Green is in vogue right now and made a 5400rpm low power drive it would could be the quietest high capacity drive we've heard (or not heard as the case may be).

ACook
Posts: 282
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: In the Palace

Post by ACook » Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:25 am

Should compare it to the Western Digital AV-GP WD10EVCS

about the same price. 5400rpm reportedly it seems though.

Samsung F1 are starting to be taken over by WD's Green pricewise, both are now at least 15e cheaper than the above mentioned.

Have to wonder if the 25e premium is worth for the WD GP in these economically tight times.

Broadleaf
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:57 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Post by Broadleaf » Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:35 pm

Historically A/V (audio/visual) rated drives differed in their greater ability for a steady content delivery. The A/V friendly delivery is related to the amount of surface flaws and how they are remapped.

Reachable
Friend of SPCR
Posts: 396
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Western Mass.

Post by Reachable » Wed Feb 18, 2009 5:52 pm

The acoustic specs for the lower capacity Pipeline HD are:

160 GB 1.9/2.1 (typical/max, bels)

320 GB 1.9/2.1

500 GB 2.1/2.4

as opposed to the Pipeline Pro reviewed here:

1 TB 2.9/3.1


Sounds like quite a difference. The smaller capacity models could be quiet drives indeed.

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Post by MikeC » Thu Feb 19, 2009 9:29 am

Reachable wrote:The acoustic specs for the lower capacity Pipeline HD are:

160 GB 1.9/2.1 (typical/max, bels)

320 GB 1.9/2.1

500 GB 2.1/2.4

as opposed to the Pipeline Pro reviewed here:

1 TB 2.9/3.1


Sounds like quite a difference. The smaller capacity models could be quiet drives indeed.
Yes, it true, the differences are quite big. Why? Because the other models all run at 5900 RPM. This was the main reason that I sought out Pipeline samples many months ago, but I was away when Larry was doing the testing -- and the current datasheet for the smaller models don't mention spindle speed.

I've added a postscript about this at the bottom of the last page of the article.

ACook
Posts: 282
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: In the Palace

Post by ACook » Thu Feb 19, 2009 3:04 pm

5900 rpm, weird...

why are the standard rpms 5400 and 7200 anyway?

floffe
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:36 am
Location: Linköping, Sweden

Post by floffe » Fri Feb 20, 2009 1:03 am

ACook wrote:why are the standard rpms 5400 and 7200 anyway?
Probably because they are nice multiples of 60, so 90 and 120 revolutions per second, respectively.

Post Reply