Ralf Hutter wrote:
Is there a good reason to start >> another thread <<
on this exact same topic?
Let's continue the discussion here then.
The one thing that drives me crazy the most is the argument that people should "earn" their place in society.
And if they fail to prove that they have the value you can accpet, they have automatically lost justification to live, is that right ? Sounds like a paranoya to me.
Is it right that you think, those who cannot be motivated paying back, should die or maybe be sent into gas chambers ?
Possibly you wouldn't want to make your fingers dirty with blood, and rather choose to let the case resolve itself, because those people falling through the social net don't turn to be criminals, no ?
They don't know how to abuse the system, and if they did, they would never do it, is that what you think ?
They basically are wrong instantly, because we don't want to look closer at what has gone wrong with the individual.
One equal haircut for everybody.
All we want is them to contribute. How they do it, doesn't matter and you wouldn't care how sensless and underpaid the job was, as long as he does something ... anything would do.
That makes you sleep better at night ?
That is typical thinking of people who either are well off or having a hard life and could not bear others to have it any
Who are you to decide about life and death of others ? Are you God ? And even if.
Why pointing out constantly that people "get" money for doing nothing
You haven't finished thinking and to give your opinion based on insufficient data, that's just not smart.
Or why don't you critizise that most wealthy people, doing nothing all day ?
I guess in your eyes, they have earned their place by being lucky, right ?
So, to live and die has become a matter of luck.
I cannot hear that vomit anymore, about who works harder - deserves more
. Neglecting that you have to have some investment before you can multyply it.
Where does that the poor leave ? I don't think you care, as long as it works for you.
It appears to me that you defend the blood eagle, and want the host to accept the eagle to continue sucking blood.
If the host complaints, you simply point out that everybody has to live with blood eagles, sucking blood.
Doesn't make sense to you ? To me neither. But who cares about sense ?