It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 10:33 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 25
I think a lot of things late at night, but lately I've been wondering: What if you removed the heat spreader on a modern CPU so that the die(s) made direct contact with the heatsink, just as we all used to do back in the good old days? There could be an issue of excess weight on the die, but with a proper mounting system the heatsink should just be touching the die, not exerting force on it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:58 am
Posts: 144
Location: Poland
Ah, the trembling hands whenever I changed the heatsink on my Athlon XP! I don't miss those times :) I think since modern CPUs (especially Intel) tend to have the heatspreader soldered to the die, the risk is just too high and the gain is too little.

Besides - the heatsink mounting mechanisms are designed for the heatspreader in place - the pressure would probably be too light due to the missing milimeter.

Anyway, if you want to go ahead with it, google "IHS removal" and see what others did to mutilate their CPUs :)

_________________
CASE: Antec Solo; MOBO: MSI P67A-C45; CPU: i5 2500K@4.4GHz + Mugen2; RAM: 8GB DDR3 1333MHz; GPU: PowerColor 5750 1GBD5-S3DH passive; PSU: Corsair HX520; SSD: Patriot Inferno 120GB; HDD: Samsung F2 1TB HD103SI; SOUND: Asus Xonar DX; FANS: Slipstream @700RPM exhaust; 2xNexus 92mm @6V intake. DISPLAY: 26" LCD Fujitsu Siemens Amilo SL 3260W


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 7:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 457
Location: de_DE
A little how-to on IHS removal.
The IHS on most CPUs is soldered on. To remove it you have to cut the rubber and heat it to 85 Celsius.
Then you have to take the mounting bracket apart since you removed the extra height of the CPU.
Gently reseat your heatsink and, viola!
Temps should improve by 5-10 degrees.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:19 am
Posts: 384
Location: Boston, MA, USA
boost wrote:
heat it to 85 Celsius.

Assuming the chip is RoHS compliant, this is probably not accurate. I did a bit of solder rework station design in college (~3 years ago), and most lead free solders were 210C - 230C reflow temperatures. This actually makes it a lot harder to remove a device without damaging it (or the PCB). I doubt a soldering iron/toaster oven would be a safe approach without a good way to check thermals.

The article may have been based on non-RoHS chips?
Edit: or the solder may be different, given that its electrical properties are not important?

_________________
Currently running Mint 14 MATE on all machines.
Desktop/Gaming: E8400 / 650ti + Accelero S1 / Antec Solo
Myth Backend + Home Server: D945GSEJT / WD15EADS / Hauppage 950Q / Home made case
Myth Frontend + HTPC: Sempron 140 / Asus M4A785-M
Notebook:AMD A4-3300M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:51 am
Posts: 464
Location: Sweden, Stockholm
hall1k wrote:
I think a lot of things late at night, but lately I've been wondering: What if you removed the heat spreader on a modern CPU so that the die(s) made direct contact with the heatsink, just as we all used to do back in the good old days? There could be an issue of excess weight on the die, but with a proper mounting system the heatsink should just be touching the die, not exerting force on it.


And why would you risk messing up a perfectly working CPU just to get at best 5-10c advantage ? Is it not just simpler to change cooler or get a better fan or two ?
And if there is no pressure on die thermals will suffer, you need pressure from CPU cooler in order to have effective heat transfer. There are many heatsinks out there that put low pressure on heatspreader and those coolers usually suck big time. So one can put like this, not enough pressure=low performance but if you remove heat spreader that pressure can mess up that core. IMHO not worth bothering.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 25
Redzo wrote:
And why would you risk messing up a perfectly working CPU just to get at best 5-10c advantage ?


Hahaha you're talking to the wrong guy here. I only asked because the last time I did something like this was with an athlon 64 X2, in which the heat spreader was not soldered to the CPU die at all. I would have to check if newer processors are indeed soldered, as the thermal compound they use between the die and the heat spreader can behave strikingly like solder given enough pressure and heat from regular usage. Thus, it might be easier to remove it from an unused chip. Furthermore, if you know exactly what you're doing, the risk is negligible. Also, the amount of pressure does not matter as long as there is some. The arctic silver 5 or whatever you're using will take care of the rest.

You'd be surprised how much pressure those dies can take, anyways. Hell, back in the day I used to have to push down on the old athlon XP's with all my strength just to get the damn heatsink on with those terrible clips they used. That's much much more force than even a 1kg heatsink will exert, especially since the heatsink would be sticking out parallel to the ground, meaning gravity is not much of a factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 457
Location: de_DE
andymcca wrote:
Assuming the chip is RoHS compliant, this is probably not accurate. I did a bit of solder rework station design in college (~3 years ago), and most lead free solders were 210C - 230C reflow temperatures. This actually makes it a lot harder to remove a device without damaging it (or the PCB). I doubt a soldering iron/toaster oven would be a safe approach without a good way to check thermals.

The article may have been based on non-RoHS chips?
Edit: or the solder may be different, given that its electrical properties are not important?

I guess it's more a thermal paste than what you would call solder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Removal of heat spreader for better cooling performance?
PostPosted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:19 am
Posts: 384
Location: Boston, MA, USA
boost wrote:
I guess it's more a thermal paste than what you would call solder.
This is what I was leaning towards, but I can't think of anything lead free that would melt at 100C below the lead reflow temperature. I was thinking silver, but I looked it up and the melting point is actually quite high. Any guesses? (Or perhaps it is a gummy substance, and heat merely makes it easier to deform?)

Edit: I know! Mercury. That's not on RoHS, right? :)

_________________
Currently running Mint 14 MATE on all machines.
Desktop/Gaming: E8400 / 650ti + Accelero S1 / Antec Solo
Myth Backend + Home Server: D945GSEJT / WD15EADS / Hauppage 950Q / Home made case
Myth Frontend + HTPC: Sempron 140 / Asus M4A785-M
Notebook:AMD A4-3300M


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group