HFat wrote:
Forget random benchmarks. The 2120T is faster than a G530.
It takes a G620 to equal its single-threaded performance. It guess it depends on the application but I'm not sure you'll find one where its multi-threaded performance doesn't beat any Pentium/Celeron.
Good to know.
HFat wrote:
In general, the i3 T dual-cores are poor value. Intel's TDP values are useless to compare individual models. I'd probably go for the G530 depending on its price relative to the slightly faster models. And if I wanted the i3 features for some reason, I'd probably pick the cheapest one. Note that you need a T model if you want the low-profile cooler. In that case, I'd probably go for the cheapest Celeron or Pentium T model.
How does this relate to potentially going fanless in the future? Also, while the TDP values may be useless, I'm a bit concerned about running the G530 off the 80W power supply. You think it would be OK?
HFat wrote:
I don't know what it takes to guarantee flawless 1080p on Linux. I'm not sure it can be done. I've never used high-res content through Flash. It's such garbage.
I don't think Flash supports GPU acceleration on Linux unless you've got an Nvidia.
CA_Steve wrote:
HFat wrote:
I don't think Flash supports GPU acceleration on Linux unless you've got an Nvidia.
Nvidia or Broadcom. You can follow all the wailing and gnashing of Linux user's teeth at Phoronix.com. There's
hope of a 3rd party bringing an add-on solution.
Yea, I've been familiar with the lack of hardware acceleration for a while, that's why I'm switching off my old 5000+. I end up having to run a script that switches resolution prior to starting Hulu Desktop. That being said, I'll be using Intel graphics integrated off the chip for now, as I'm trying to keep this as minimal an install with as low a power/heat profile as I can.
Thanks,
Ben