Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Want to talk about one of the articles in SPCR? Here's the forum for you.
Post Reply
MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by MikeC » Fri Feb 10, 2012 9:26 am


Enzo_FX
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by Enzo_FX » Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:07 am

Impressive.

Kriz
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Australia

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by Kriz » Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:01 am

I'm really liking these Platinum PSUs. Really looking forward to the day where these can be both small and efficient enough to be used as external bricks while allowing 500W+ :D

Just wondering if it were possible to include more detail when using 230VAC to test the efficiency of PSUs in general?

The main reason for asking is this recent review I read of the Antec EarthWatts Platinum 650W where the efficiency was much less at lower loads on 230VAC compared to 115VAC:

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Ante ... num/5.html

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by MikeC » Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:12 am

Kriz wrote:I'm really liking these Platinum PSUs. Really looking forward to the day where these can be both small and efficient enough to be used as external bricks while allowing 500W+ :D
Yeah, that'd be cool.
Kriz wrote:Just wondering if it were possible to include more detail when using 230VAC to test the efficiency of PSUs in general?

The main reason for asking is this recent review I read of the Antec EarthWatts Platinum 650W where the efficiency was much less at lower loads on 230VAC compared to 115VAC: http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Ante ... num/5.html
That's an unusual result, I've never seen anything like it. I have to admit, I've rarely run a full series of load tests at the higher voltage, just a few spot checks, and the rule of thumb (rarely broken) is ~2% lower efficiency at 120VAC. I would be loathe to run such load tests in both input voltages; the time required to do so with my entirely manual test setup nearly doubles. Techpowerup's PSU review has obviously upgraded his test system recently -- it's pretty impressive.

Kriz
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Australia

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by Kriz » Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:34 am

MikeC wrote: That's an unusual result, I've never seen anything like it. I have to admit, I've rarely run a full series of load tests at the higher voltage, just a few spot checks, and the rule of thumb (rarely broken) is ~2% lower efficiency at 120VAC. I would be loathe to run such load tests in both input voltages; the time required to do so with my entirely manual test setup nearly doubles. Techpowerup's PSU review has obviously upgraded his test system recently -- it's pretty impressive.
Whenever I read a PSU review, I always want to see how efficient it is at the 10-40W DC end as that seems to be where our computers spend most of their time these days.

Would it be possible to just show the results at 20W DC for 115VAC and 230VAC as well as the mid-range test that you do? That would also allow you to see if there are any weird results occuring at low loads when on 230VAC, as well as satisfying my own curiosity as a person in a 230VAC country :D

Just as an aside, I predict this year we will start to see the first no compromise gaming computers being assembled that will idle under 25W AC. This should be achievable right now with a well chosen PSU and motherboard with a HD7950 or HD7970 that switches off their fans and use around 1W when entering ZeroCore Power mode. The next evolution of this would be integrating a special core into the GPU that can do basic 3D effects and video decode while consuming 1W max, like the designs being used in the current tablets from Apple and Samsung, etc. Ah well, I can only dream...

MikeC
Site Admin
Posts: 12285
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by MikeC » Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:07 am

Kriz wrote:Whenever I read a PSU review, I always want to see how efficient it is at the 10-40W DC end as that seems to be where our computers spend most of their time these days.

Would it be possible to just show the results at 20W DC for 115VAC and 230VAC as well as the mid-range test that you do? That would also allow you to see if there are any weird results occuring at low loads when on 230VAC, as well as satisfying my own curiosity as a person in a 230VAC country :D
Yes, that's doable. OK.
Just as an aside, I predict this year we will start to see the first no compromise gaming computers being assembled that will idle under 25W AC. This should be achievable right now with a well chosen PSU and motherboard with a HD7950 or HD7970 that switches off their fans and use around 1W when entering ZeroCore Power mode. The next evolution of this would be integrating a special core into the GPU that can do basic 3D effects and video decode while consuming 1W max, like the designs being used in the current tablets from Apple and Samsung, etc. Ah well, I can only dream...
I dunno.... maybe <30W, but I can't see <25W.

The most efficient PSU I measured at 22.5W load (Kingwin LZP550 Platinum) was 77.5% -- it drew 29W AC. If we lower the output, efficiency gets worse quickly. For that PSU to draw <25W AC, the DC output would have to be <18W. Is this feasible now with motherboard, RAM, SSD & 1W video card? Maybe. We're also going to start seeing 80 Plus Titanium PSUs some time this year. 90% eff. at 10% load, 92% at 20% load, 96% at 50% load and 91% at full load. That's only for 230VAC; no Titanium defined for 115VAC. But that probably won't help with <20W load -- you need a <200W rated Platinum for any chance of seeing even a 2W AC power reduction at <20W load (compared to that Kingwin). The lowest power retail Platinum is the 500/550W Kingwins, afaik; Dell has a 350W unit but it's an unsuitable noisy 1U server type.

Kriz
*Lifetime Patron*
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:16 am
Location: Australia

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by Kriz » Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

MikeC wrote: Yes, that's doable. OK.
That's great to hear :D
MikeC wrote: I dunno.... maybe <30W, but I can't see <25W.

The most efficient PSU I measured at 22.5W load (Kingwin LZP550 Platinum) was 77.5% -- it drew 29W AC. If we lower the output, efficiency gets worse quickly. For that PSU to draw <25W AC, the DC output would have to be <18W. Is this feasible now with motherboard, RAM, SSD & 1W video card? Maybe. We're also going to start seeing 80 Plus Titanium PSUs some time this year. 90% eff. at 10% load, 92% at 20% load, 96% at 50% load and 91% at full load. That's only for 230VAC; no Titanium defined for 115VAC. But that probably won't help with <20W load -- you need a <200W rated Platinum for any chance of seeing even a 2W AC power reduction at <20W load (compared to that Kingwin). The lowest power retail Platinum is the 500/550W Kingwins, afaik; Dell has a 350W unit but it's an unsuitable noisy 1U server type.
Bring on the Titanium PSUs! It would be interesting to see how close it would be if we were to combine the parts of Vicotnik's i5-2500K system in their sig with a Kingwin LZP550 or STR500 PSU and AMD HD7970. The lowest wattage I've seen is the Antec EarthWatts Platinum 450W that just started arriving in Australia, but if the 650W had issues at low wattage with 230VAC then the 450W is also likely to. Maybe it was just that review unit?

NeilBlanchard
Moderator
Posts: 7681
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2002 7:11 pm
Location: Maynard, MA, Eaarth
Contact:

Re: Kingwin LZP-1000: Platinum Efficiency at a KiloWatt

Post by NeilBlanchard » Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:39 am

Great power supply, but way too much for almost any computer, I think. It might work well for a slot car track...

Post Reply