It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2014 12:44 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1009
Location: Vancouver
http://www.silentpcreview.com/Power_Distribution_in_Three_PCs


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:00 pm
Posts: 21
Page 2 has an error: The 2500K should be listed as 32nm with a 95-watt TDP.

Interesting article :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 3:26 pm
Posts: 11788
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Kardax wrote:
Page 2 has an error: The 2500K should be listed as 32nm with a 95-watt TDP.

Interesting article :)

corrected.

_________________
Mike Chin,
Editor/Publisher, SPCR
Support SPCR with your donations!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:12 am
Posts: 545
Location: UK
What is the i7 system using all that 3.3V current for?

I look forward to the day when PCs require only +12V (or +24V, or any other voltage, as long as it's only one).

_________________
https://mrevil.asvachin.eu/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4247
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Thanks for the update!

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:29 am
Posts: 564
Location: de_DE
Thank you for the analysis.
It's good to have something to point to when people want advice on a new system and choose a 600W PSU for a system that's mostly the same as the i5 6870 combination from the article.

_________________
Lian Li V600, Asus P77Z-M Pro, i5-3570K 4.4GHz with Scythe Orochi, 140mm Slipstream 500RPM and Mugen2 115X Bolt through kit,
Evga GTX 670 FTW+ 4GB with Thermalright Spitfire and Thermalright TY-150 500-800RPM, Seasonic 460W Platinum Fanless


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 4:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:46 am
Posts: 16
boost wrote:
Thank you for the analysis.
It's good to have something to point to when people want advice on a new system and choose a 600W PSU for a system that's mostly the same as the i5 6870 combination from the article.

Agreed. It's also showing that there's a definite lack of quiet, high-efficiency PSUs on the market for the 300-400W range. From a gamer perspective, it would be interesting to check the power consumption under gaming situation, to balance it against a full load situation, and help decide what PSU range once should get.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:55 am 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4247
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Hasdrubal wrote:
From a gamer perspective, it would be interesting to check the power consumption under gaming situation, to balance it against a full load situation, and help decide what PSU range once should get.


Unfortunately, every game has a different load power. One could lightly stress a system and another could crush it...see my signature for an example.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 3:22 pm
Posts: 2
Location: San Diego, CA
While I appreciate what you have tried to do with this article I think it is very misleading. The reason I think so is because while the i5-2500K + HD 6870 is less efficient in power usage it is highly more effiecient in terms of processing power. If you were to run some benchmarks for the computers such as 3dMark 11, SiSoftware Sandra 2010, Blender, etc. and normalize them a set score you would find that the new generation of processors (xxxx models from intel and fx series from AMD) will perform quicker while drawing less power so your energy usage is lower overall. Plus with new zero power states on the processors and now HD 7000 series gpus the idle power is much lower. I am not saying I disagree with the fact that most of the computers (even gaming) need the high power output (750+) psu that are available but that it needs to be tempered by the ability of the system to complete the tasks. Howerver I could be wrong but if you would be so kind to test my theory I would appreciate it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:27 am
Posts: 1694
Location: Switzerland
I'm not sure it's misleading. Almost every article comparing gear can be misleading to those who jump to unwarranted conclusions (most people, that is).
This article performs a useful service in documenting quality measurements of power use in real conditions. If you use it to determine which CPU is more efficient or something, you're using it wrong.
Obviously idle power is hardly a function of the CPU. The mobo is a lot more important for one thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:10 am 
Offline
*Lifetime Patron*

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 1:45 am
Posts: 1775
Location: At Home
Silverking wrote:
While I appreciate what you have tried to do with this article I think it is very misleading. The reason I think so is because while the i5-2500K + HD 6870 is less efficient in power usage it is highly more effiecient in terms of processing power.

The article is clearly looking purely at the distribution of power consumption and NOT power efficiency.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 6:45 am 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 161
Location: Toronto, Ontario
This article confirms my suspicions that most power supplies sold these days are extreme overkill for most users. Your i5 system would be a typical mid-high range system in today's market and you show that it needs no more than about a 300W PS.

Why didn't you run the same test with the i5-2500K system using the onboard GPU rather than a discrete GPU? I suspect that in that case your conclusion would be that a 200W PS would be sufficient.

A modern desktop system with a SB (or soon Ivy Bridge) CPU using on board graphics with an SSD really doesn't need much power. And unless you are a gamer I don't know how this isn't a sufficient system for everyone, assuming that you have one PC acting as a media server for all of your large files.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 6:10 am
Posts: 359
Quote:
Intel CPUs now pull a greater percentage of power from the main 24-pin ATX connector, while AMD CPUs seem to be doing the opposite.

Isn't this a function of the motherboard rather than the CPU?


Mr Evil wrote:
I look forward to the day when PCs require only +12V (or +24V, or any other voltage, as long as it's only one).

+5V looks like a good candidate to drop first. What's the purpose of the negative voltages?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Power Distribution in Three PCs (2012)
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:03 am
Posts: 364
Location: Sweden
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Quote:
Intel CPUs now pull a greater percentage of power from the main 24-pin ATX connector, while AMD CPUs seem to be doing the opposite.
Isn't this a function of the motherboard rather than the CPU?
Might be, but extremely interesting nonetheless!
In multi-rail PSUs the 24-pin connector is often bunched together with some other potentially power hungry connectors, while the 8-pin connector get a rail of its own.
Given that the 24-pin is also used to feed most/all PCIe slots with up to 6A each, this connector really deserve its own 12V rail.

Olaf van der Spek wrote:
+5V looks like a good candidate to drop first.
Yeah, nobody use USB these days...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group