It is currently Thu Apr 17, 2014 4:30 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB SSD Review
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:33 pm 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 1008
Location: Vancouver
http://www.silentpcreview.com/Kingston_HyperX_3K_120GB/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB SSD Review
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
Moderator

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 4:36 am
Posts: 4243
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Seems like SSDs are finally up the performance curve enough to where new generations are just incrementally faster for everyday apps. You probably need an i7 to wring the speed out of these parts. It'll be interesting to see how they juggle shrinking lithography doubling chip sizes->halving read/write channels and having to commit more space to preserve read/write cycles vs performance.

_________________
1080p Gaming build: i5-4670K, Mugen 4, MSI Z87-G45, MSI GTX 760 2GB Gaming, 8GB 1866 RAM, Samsung Evo 250GB, WD Red 2TB, Samsung DVD burner, Fractal Define R4, Antec True Quiet 140 (2 front + rear) case fans, Seasonic X-560. 35-40W idle, 45-55W video streaming, 170-200W WoW, 200-230W Rift, 318W stress test (Prime95 + Furmark)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB SSD Review
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:30 am 
Offline
Friend of SPCR

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 161
Location: Toronto, Ontario
On page 2 of the review you include the following:
Quote:
TESTING

Our samples were tested according to our standard hard drive testing methodology. As of mid-2008, we have been conducting most acoustics tests in our own 10~11 dBA anechoic chamber, which results in more accurate, lower SPL readings than before, especially with <20 dBA@1m SPL.

Two forms of hard drive noise are measured:
1.Airborne acoustics
2.Vibration-induced noise.

These two types of noise impact the subjective perception of hard drive noise differently depending on how and where the drive is mounted.

Both forms of noise are evaluated objectively and subjectively. Airborne acoustics are measured in our anechoic chamber using a lab reference microphone and computer audio measurement system. Measurements are taken at a distance of one meter from the top of the drive using an A-weighted filter. Vibration noise is rated on a scale of 1-10 by comparing against our standard reference drives.

As of late-2011, we have been conducting performance testing. A combination of timed real-world tests is used to represent a workload of common activities for a boot drive including loading games, running disk-intensive applications, copying files, and installing programs. Synthetic tests are also run to better judge the performance across the entire span of the drive.
Why include all of this since it is Not Applicable to an SSD drive as you say on page 5?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB SSD Review
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:06 am 
Offline
SPCR Reviewer

Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2002 6:33 am
Posts: 8636
Location: Sunny SoCal
wayner wrote:
On page 2 of the review you include the following:
Quote:
TESTING

Our samples were tested according to our standard hard drive testing methodology. As of mid-2008, we have been conducting most acoustics tests in our own 10~11 dBA anechoic chamber, which results in more accurate, lower SPL readings than before, especially with <20 dBA@1m SPL.

Two forms of hard drive noise are measured:
1.Airborne acoustics
2.Vibration-induced noise.

These two types of noise impact the subjective perception of hard drive noise differently depending on how and where the drive is mounted.

Both forms of noise are evaluated objectively and subjectively. Airborne acoustics are measured in our anechoic chamber using a lab reference microphone and computer audio measurement system. Measurements are taken at a distance of one meter from the top of the drive using an A-weighted filter. Vibration noise is rated on a scale of 1-10 by comparing against our standard reference drives.

As of late-2011, we have been conducting performance testing. A combination of timed real-world tests is used to represent a workload of common activities for a boot drive including loading games, running disk-intensive applications, copying files, and installing programs. Synthetic tests are also run to better judge the performance across the entire span of the drive.
Why include all of this since it is Not Applicable to an SSD drive as you say on page 5?



Perhaps it's in response to this comment regarding a previous SSD review:

viewtopic.php?p=564267#p564267

_________________
Main Box: Intel i3-3225, Intel DH77EB, 16GB Corsair RAM, 256GB Samsung 830, SS360GP PSU, CM PS07 case.
Music Server: Intel DH77EB + i3-3220, 2xSamsung 2TB F4, Pico PSU, Fractal Define Mini, 2xScythe Fans @250 rpm.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group