Yep, that's the report I read. BUT, all their testing was quantitative (HQV, dropped frames, etc.). They never sat back and said, "Hmmm, all the numbers are there and on our <awesome HDTV> the image looks <awesome, great, OK, horrible, turn the dog around/shave it's rear/have it walk backwards>."
While the number from those tests will give a really good idea on how the resulting image will be, how does it really look with the Mark1 Mod 0 Eyeball (military term for your eye). Yeah, it's subjective a bit because everyone is a little different. But for professional reviewers, I think that subjectiveness is also a good metric.
Just my 2cents. I asked the same thing from Anand. Am I asking too much from reviewers?